Which has higher waste — emissions, Aruba or Monaco?

Aruba, at 0.0041 kt against 0.004 kt in Monaco as of 2023.

How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Monaco?

63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Monaco: Waste — Emissions (N2O)

Aruba

0.0041 kt

in 2023

Monaco

0.004 kt

in 2023

Aruba rank

212th

Monaco rank

213th

Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time

Aruba
Monaco

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.0041 kt against 0.004 kt in Monaco, a difference of 0.0001 kt.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Monaco ahead.

Aruba ranks 212th and Monaco ranks 213th of 232 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Monaco in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Monaco	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0014 kt	0.0017 kt	0.0003 kt	Monaco
1970s	0.0018 kt	0.0021 kt	0.0003 kt	Monaco
1980s	0.0023 kt	0.0025 kt	0.0002 kt	Monaco
1990s	0.0028 kt	0.0028 kt	0 kt	—
2000s	0.0033 kt	0.003 kt	0.0003 kt	Aruba
2010s	0.0039 kt	0.0035 kt	0.0004 kt	Aruba
2020s	0.0041 kt	0.0039 kt	0.0002 kt	Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions, Aruba or Monaco?: Aruba, at 0.0041 kt against 0.004 kt in Monaco as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions between Aruba and Monaco?: 0.0001 kt, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Monaco?: 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Monaco rank globally for waste — emissions?: Aruba ranks 212th and Monaco ranks 213th of 232 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Monaco: Waste — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/aruba/monaco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/aruba/monaco/">Aruba vs Monaco: Waste — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Unit: kt
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage: 265 places, 15,268 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 17 September 2026

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf