Estonia vs Liberia: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Estonia
- Liberia
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0.139 kt against 0.137 kt in Liberia, a difference of 0.002 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.
Estonia ranks 162nd and Liberia ranks 164th of 232 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0887 kt | 0.0551 kt | 0.0336 kt | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0.1083 kt | 0.0725 kt | 0.0358 kt | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0.1439 kt | 0.111 kt | 0.0329 kt | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0.1398 kt | 0.1335 kt | 0.0063 kt | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Estonia or Liberia?
- Estonia, at 0.139 kt against 0.137 kt in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Estonia and Liberia?
- 0.002 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Liberia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Liberia rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Estonia ranks 162nd and Liberia ranks 164th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf