Ethiopia vs Viet Nam: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Ethiopia
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 5.79 kt against 5.57 kt in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.22 kt.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 232 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.77 kt | 2.45 kt | 0.6771 kt | Viet Nam |
| 2000s | 2.66 kt | 3.39 kt | 0.723 kt | Viet Nam |
| 2010s | 4.44 kt | 4.82 kt | 0.374 kt | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 5.36 kt | 5.63 kt | 0.27 kt | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Ethiopia or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 5.79 kt against 5.57 kt in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Ethiopia and Viet Nam?
- 0.22 kt, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Viet Nam?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Viet Nam rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Ethiopia ranks 27th and Viet Nam ranks 25th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf