Georgia vs Uruguay: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Georgia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0.208 kt against 0.206 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0.002 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 150th and Uruguay ranks 153rd of 232 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2231 kt | 0.1825 kt | 0.0406 kt | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0.2235 kt | 0.1779 kt | 0.0456 kt | Georgia |
| 2010s | 0.1992 kt | 0.187 kt | 0.0122 kt | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.2052 kt | 0.201 kt | 0.0042 kt | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Georgia or Uruguay?
- Georgia, at 0.208 kt against 0.206 kt in Uruguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Georgia and Uruguay?
- 0.002 kt, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Georgia and Uruguay rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Georgia ranks 150th and Uruguay ranks 153rd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf