Kazakhstan vs Niger: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Kazakhstan
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 1.4 kt against 1.35 kt in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.05 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 65th and Niger ranks 63rd of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Niger in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8846 kt | 0.3718 kt | 0.5129 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.887 kt | 0.6282 kt | 0.2588 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 1.07 kt | 1.01 kt | 0.0618 kt | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 1.3 kt | 1.33 kt | 0.0325 kt | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Kazakhstan or Niger?
- Niger, at 1.4 kt against 1.35 kt in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Kazakhstan and Niger?
- 0.05 kt, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Niger?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Niger rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Kazakhstan ranks 65th and Niger ranks 63rd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf