Kyrgyzstan vs Libya: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0.356 kt against 0.349 kt in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.007 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th and Libya ranks 132nd of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.24 kt | 0.1906 kt | 0.0494 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 0.2683 kt | 0.173 kt | 0.0953 kt | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 0.3096 kt | 0.3142 kt | 0.0046 kt | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.341 kt | 0.3505 kt | 0.0095 kt | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Kyrgyzstan or Libya?
- Libya, at 0.356 kt against 0.349 kt in Kyrgyzstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Kyrgyzstan and Libya?
- 0.007 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Libya?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Libya rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 135th and Libya ranks 132nd of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf