Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom: Waste — Emissions (N2O)

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
26.43 kt
in 2023
United Kingdom
7.76 kt
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
19th
United Kingdom rank
16th

Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • United Kingdom
0510152025196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 26.43 kt against 7.76 kt in United Kingdom, a difference of 18.67 kt.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 3.4 times United Kingdom's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United Kingdom ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and United Kingdom ranks 16th of 33 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 5 and United Kingdom in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) United Kingdom Difference Ahead
1960s 2.47 kt 3.09 kt 0.6213 kt United Kingdom
1970s 3.29 kt 3.47 kt 0.1825 kt United Kingdom
1980s 4.23 kt 3.5 kt 0.7289 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 9.7 kt 3.99 kt 5.71 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 14.4 kt 5.08 kt 9.32 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 21.32 kt 6.91 kt 14.41 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 25.52 kt 7.62 kt 17.9 kt Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher waste — emissions, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Kingdom?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 26.43 kt against 7.76 kt in United Kingdom as of 2023.
What is the difference in waste — emissions between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom?
18.67 kt, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom rank globally for waste — emissions?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 19th and United Kingdom ranks 16th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom: Waste — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/waste-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/united-kingdom/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom: Waste — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
265 places, 15,268 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf