Latvia vs Mongolia: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Latvia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.205 kt against 0.198 kt in Mongolia, a difference of 0.007 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 154th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 232 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1886 kt | 0.1119 kt | 0.0767 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.1732 kt | 0.1198 kt | 0.0534 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.1912 kt | 0.162 kt | 0.0292 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.203 kt | 0.1948 kt | 0.0083 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Latvia or Mongolia?
- Latvia, at 0.205 kt against 0.198 kt in Mongolia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Latvia and Mongolia?
- 0.007 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mongolia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Mongolia rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 154th and Mongolia ranks 156th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf