Moldova vs Slovenia: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Moldova
- Slovenia
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 0.172 kt against 0.166 kt in Slovenia, a difference of 0.006 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 157th and Slovenia ranks 159th of 232 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.1821 kt | 0.1305 kt | 0.0516 kt | Moldova |
| 2000s | 0.1862 kt | 0.1328 kt | 0.0534 kt | Moldova |
| 2010s | 0.1805 kt | 0.1497 kt | 0.0308 kt | Moldova |
| 2020s | 0.1745 kt | 0.163 kt | 0.0115 kt | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Moldova or Slovenia?
- Moldova, at 0.172 kt against 0.166 kt in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Moldova and Slovenia?
- 0.006 kt, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Moldova and Slovenia rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Moldova ranks 157th and Slovenia ranks 159th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf