Nauru vs Palau: Waste — Emissions
Waste — Emissions over time
- Nauru
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 0.0003 kt against 0.0002 kt in Nauru, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Palau's figure about 1.5 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 227th and Palau ranks 226th of 232 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 2 and Palau in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | 0.0002 kt | Nauru |
| 2000s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | Nauru |
| 2010s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0 kt | Palau |
| 2020s | 0.0002 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0001 kt | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Nauru or Palau?
- Palau, at 0.0003 kt against 0.0002 kt in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Nauru and Palau?
- 0.0001 kt, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Palau?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Palau rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Nauru ranks 227th and Palau ranks 226th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf