Serbia vs Tajikistan: Waste — Emissions (N2O)
Waste — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Serbia
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 0.527 kt against 0.504 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.023 kt.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 118th and Tajikistan ranks 115th of 232 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 2 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4593 kt | 0.2365 kt | 0.2228 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.4701 kt | 0.3657 kt | 0.1044 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.4962 kt | 0.5002 kt | 0.004 kt | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher waste — emissions, Serbia or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 0.527 kt against 0.504 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in waste — emissions between Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 0.023 kt, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tajikistan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Tajikistan rank globally for waste — emissions?
- Serbia ranks 118th and Tajikistan ranks 115th of 232 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Waste — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf