Australia vs Middle Africa: Wheat — Burning crop residues

Australia
6.23 million t
in 2050
Middle Africa
9,537 t
in 2050
Australia rank
8th
Middle Africa rank
10th

Wheat — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia
  • Middle Africa
02.0M4.0M6.0M196120052050

How they compare

Australia currently reports 6.23 million t against 9,537 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 6.22 million t.

That makes Australia's figure about 653.4 times Middle Africa's.

Across all 65 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 8th and Middle Africa ranks 10th of 125 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 3.18 million t 9,486 t 3.17 million t Australia
1970s 3.49 million t 9,024 t 3.48 million t Australia
1980s 4.37 million t 6,250 t 4.37 million t Australia
1990s 3.69 million t 5,305 t 3.69 million t Australia
2000s 4.96 million t 5,201 t 4.95 million t Australia
2010s 4.96 million t 5,750 t 4.96 million t Australia
2020s 4.82 million t 8,484 t 4.81 million t Australia
2030s 6.10 million t 7,720 t 6.10 million t Australia
2050s 6.23 million t 9,537 t 6.22 million t Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, Australia or Middle Africa?
Australia, at 6.23 million t against 9,537 t in Middle Africa as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between Australia and Middle Africa?
6.22 million t, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Middle Africa?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Australia and Middle Africa rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
Australia ranks 8th and Middle Africa ranks 10th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Middle Africa: Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia/middle-africa/">Australia vs Middle Africa: Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).