Eritrea vs New Zealand: Wheat — Burning crop residues

Eritrea
12,780 t
in 2050
New Zealand
18,250 t
in 2050
Eritrea rank
89th
New Zealand rank
88th

Wheat — Burning crop residues over time

  • Eritrea
  • New Zealand
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k196120052050

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 18,250 t against 12,780 t in Eritrea, a difference of 5,470 t.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Eritrea's.

Across all 33 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Eritrea ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 88th of 125 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 10,404 t 19,765 t 9,362 t New Zealand
2000s 9,792 t 17,578 t 7,785 t New Zealand
2010s 10,200 t 19,373 t 9,173 t New Zealand
2020s 10,000 t 17,259 t 7,259 t New Zealand
2030s 11,576 t 17,632 t 6,056 t New Zealand
2050s 12,780 t 18,250 t 5,470 t New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, Eritrea or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 18,250 t against 12,780 t in Eritrea as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between Eritrea and New Zealand?
5,470 t, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and New Zealand?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2050.
How do Eritrea and New Zealand rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
Eritrea ranks 89th and New Zealand ranks 88th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs New Zealand: Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/eritrea/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/eritrea/new-zealand/">Eritrea vs New Zealand: Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).