Jordan vs New Zealand: Wheat — Burning crop residues

Jordan
10,862 t
in 2050
New Zealand
18,250 t
in 2050
Jordan rank
91st
New Zealand rank
88th

Wheat — Burning crop residues over time

  • Jordan
  • New Zealand
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196120052050

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 18,250 t against 10,862 t in Jordan, a difference of 7,388 t.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times Jordan's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 88th of 125 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 96,073 t 36,878 t 59,195 t Jordan
1970s 66,620 t 36,939 t 29,681 t Jordan
1980s 34,165 t 28,515 t 5,649 t Jordan
1990s 14,685 t 18,389 t 3,704 t New Zealand
2000s 8,409 t 17,578 t 9,169 t New Zealand
2010s 6,884 t 19,373 t 12,488 t New Zealand
2020s 4,695 t 17,259 t 12,564 t New Zealand
2030s 10,857 t 17,632 t 6,775 t New Zealand
2050s 10,862 t 18,250 t 7,388 t New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, Jordan or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 18,250 t against 10,862 t in Jordan as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between Jordan and New Zealand?
7,388 t, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and New Zealand?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2050.
How do Jordan and New Zealand rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
Jordan ranks 91st and New Zealand ranks 88th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs New Zealand: Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/jordan/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/jordan/new-zealand/">Jordan vs New Zealand: Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).