Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Wheat — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
16.87 kt
in 2050
Kazakhstan
9.27 kt
in 2050
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
Kazakhstan rank
10th

Wheat — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Kazakhstan
051015196120052050

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 16.87 kt against 9.27 kt in Kazakhstan, a difference of 7.6 kt.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.8 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 125 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 4 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 10.02 kt 12.07 kt 2.05 kt Kazakhstan
2000s 13.44 kt 12.86 kt 0.5806 kt Australia and New Zealand
2010s 13.45 kt 13.24 kt 0.2076 kt Australia and New Zealand
2020s 13.05 kt 13.71 kt 0.6652 kt Kazakhstan
2030s 16.53 kt 9.64 kt 6.89 kt Australia and New Zealand
2050s 16.87 kt 9.27 kt 7.6 kt Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Kazakhstan?
Australia and New Zealand, at 16.87 kt against 9.27 kt in Kazakhstan as of 2050.
What is the difference in wheat — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan?
7.6 kt, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2050.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Kazakhstan rank globally for wheat — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and Kazakhstan ranks 10th of 125 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Wheat — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-burning-crop-residues-emissions-ch4-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/kazakhstan/">Australia and New Zealand vs Kazakhstan: Wheat — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Burning crop residues (Emissions CH4)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
169 places, 9,743 data points, 1961–2050
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Crops provides estimates of emissions associated with crop processes, namely 1) crop residues, 2) burning of crop residues, and 3) rice cultivation and the application of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, including mineral and chemical fertilizers, to soils. Estimates are computed at Tier 1 following the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 2006).