Statizoid

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in China, Hong Kong SAR

China, Hong Kong SAR: All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share was 100 % in 2023. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2023)
100 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 187 countries
All-time high
100 %
in 1990
All-time low
99.97 %
in 2009
Years of data
34
1990–2023

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in China, Hong Kong SAR, 1990–2023

0204060801001990200620231990: 100 %1991: 100 %1992: 100 %1993: 100 %1994: 100 %1995: 100 %1996: 100 %1997: 100 %1998: 100 %1999: 100 %2000: 100 %2001: 100 %2002: 100 %2003: 100 %2004: 100 %2005: 100 %2006: 100 %2007: 100 %2008: 100 %2009: 100 %2010: 100 %2011: 100 %2012: 100 %2013: 100 %2014: 100 %2015: 100 %2016: 100 %2017: 100 %2018: 100 %2019: 100 %2020: 100 %2021: 100 %2022: 100 %2023: 100 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in China, Hong Kong SAR stood at 100 %. That is the highest value across all 34 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in China, Hong Kong SAR peaked at 100 % in 1990 and was at its lowest, 99.97 %, in 2009.

That places China, Hong Kong SAR 1st out of 187 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 100 % 99.99 % 100 % 10
2000s 100 % 99.97 % 100 % 10
2010s 100 % 100 % 100 % 10
2020s 100 % 100 % 100 % 4

Countries ranked near China, Hong Kong SAR

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100 % compare
  2. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100 % compare
  3. 1 Aruba 100 % compare
  4. 1 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 100 % compare
  5. 1 Austria 100 % compare
  6. 1 Azerbaijan 100 % compare
  7. 1 Bahrain 100 % compare
  8. 1 Barbados 100 % compare
  9. 1 Belarus 100 % compare
  10. 1 Belgium 100 % compare
  11. 1 Belgium-Luxembourg 100 % compare
  12. 1 Botswana 100 % compare
  13. 1 British Virgin Islands 100 % compare
  14. 1 Bulgaria 100 % compare
  15. 1 Burkina Faso 100 % compare
  16. 1 Burundi 100 % compare
  17. 1 China, Macao SAR 100 % compare
  18. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 100 % compare
  19. 1 Comoros 100 % compare
  20. 1 Cook Islands 100 % compare
  21. 1 Croatia 100 % compare
  22. 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
  23. 1 Czechia 100 % compare
  24. 1 Denmark 100 % compare
  25. 1 Djibouti 100 % compare
  26. 1 Dominica 100 % compare
  27. 1 Egypt 100 % compare
  28. 1 Eritrea 100 % compare
  29. 1 Estonia 100 % compare
  30. 1 Finland 100 % compare
  31. 1 Gambia 100 % compare
  32. 1 Germany 100 % compare
  33. 1 Grenada 100 % compare
  34. 1 Haiti 100 % compare
  35. 1 Hungary 100 % compare
  36. 1 Iceland 100 % compare
  37. 1 Iraq 100 % compare
  38. 1 Ireland 100 % compare
  39. 1 Israel 100 % compare
  40. 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
  41. 1 Jordan 100 % compare
  42. 1 Kazakhstan 100 % compare
  43. 1 Kiribati 100 % compare
  44. 1 Kuwait 100 % compare
  45. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
  46. 1 Latvia 100 % compare
  47. 1 Lebanon 100 % compare
  48. 1 Lesotho 100 % compare
  49. 1 Libya 100 % compare
  50. 1 Lithuania 100 % compare
  51. 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
  52. 1 Maldives 100 % compare
  53. 1 Mali 100 % compare
  54. 1 Malta 100 % compare
  55. 1 Marshall Islands 100 % compare
  56. 1 Mauritania 100 % compare
  57. 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
  58. 1 Mongolia 100 % compare
  59. 1 Montenegro 100 % compare
  60. 1 Nauru 100 % compare
  61. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
  62. 1 Netherlands Antilles (former) 100 % compare
  63. 1 New Zealand 100 % compare
  64. 1 Niger 100 % compare
  65. 1 Niue 100 % compare
  66. 1 North Macedonia 100 % compare
  67. 1 Norway 100 % compare
  68. 1 Oman 100 % compare
  69. 1 Pakistan 100 % compare
  70. 1 Palau 100 % compare
  71. 1 Poland 100 % compare
  72. 1 Qatar 100 % compare
  73. 1 Republic of Korea 100 % compare
  74. 1 Romania 100 % compare
  75. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
  76. 1 Saint Lucia 100 % compare
  77. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 % compare
  78. 1 Samoa 100 % compare
  79. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100 % compare
  80. 1 Saudi Arabia 100 % compare
  81. 1 Serbia 100 % compare
  82. 1 Serbia and Montenegro 100 % compare
  83. 1 Seychelles 100 % compare
  84. 1 Singapore 100 % compare
  85. 1 Slovak Republic 100 % compare
  86. 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
  87. 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
  88. 1 Somalia 100 % compare
  89. 1 Sri Lanka 100 % compare
  90. 1 Sudan 100 % compare
  91. 1 Sweden 100 % compare
  92. 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
  93. 1 Tajikistan 100 % compare
  94. 1 Tokelau 100 % compare
  95. 1 Tonga 100 % compare
  96. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 100 % compare
  97. 1 Turkmenistan 100 % compare
  98. 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 100 % compare
  99. 1 Tuvalu 100 % compare
  100. 1 United Arab Emirates 100 % compare
  101. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
  102. 1 Uruguay 100 % compare
  103. 1 Uzbekistan 100 % compare
  104. 1 Vanuatu 100 % compare
  105. 1 Yemen 100 % compare

See the full ranking of 243 places β†’

More climate change data for China, Hong Kong SAR

All data for China, Hong Kong SAR β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in China, Hong Kong SAR?
All sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in China, Hong Kong SAR was 100 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
The highest recorded value was 100 % in 1990.
What is the lowest all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share recorded in China, Hong Kong SAR?
The lowest recorded value was 99.97 % in 2009.
How does China, Hong Kong SAR rank for all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 1st out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
Is all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share rising or falling in China, Hong Kong SAR?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this China, Hong Kong SAR data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in China, Hong Kong SAR. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-ch4/china-hong-kong-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-ch4/china-hong-kong-sar/">All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in China, Hong Kong SAR</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CH4)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.