Statizoid

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in Republic of Moldova

Republic of Moldova: All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share was 100 % in 2023. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2023)
100 %
Change on year
up 0.1%
Rank
1st
of 20 regions
All-time high
100 %
in 2000
All-time low
99.65 %
in 2014
Years of data
32
1992–2023

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in Republic of Moldova, 1992–2023

0204060801001992200720231992: 100 %1993: 100 %1994: 100 %1995: 100 %1996: 100 %1997: 100 %1998: 100 %1999: 100 %2000: 100 %2001: 100 %2002: 100 %2003: 100 %2004: 100 %2005: 100 %2006: 100 %2007: 100 %2008: 100 %2009: 100 %2010: 100 %2011: 99.9 %2012: 100 %2013: 99.9 %2014: 99.7 %2015: 100 %2016: 100 %2017: 100 %2018: 100 %2019: 100 %2020: 100 %2021: 99.9 %2022: 99.9 %2023: 100 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2023, all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in Republic of Moldova stood at 100 %. That is the highest value across all 32 years on record.

That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and up 0.1% over ten years.

Over the whole period, all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in Republic of Moldova peaked at 100 % in 2000 and was at its lowest, 99.65 %, in 2014.

Republic of Moldova ranks 1st of 20 regions on this measure, in the top 10%.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 99.98 % 99.98 % 99.99 % 8
2000s 99.99 % 99.95 % 100 % 10
2010s 99.93 % 99.65 % 100 % 10
2020s 99.95 % 99.86 % 100 % 4

Countries ranked near Republic of Moldova

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100 % compare
  2. 1 Anguilla 100 % compare
  3. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100 % compare
  4. 1 Aruba 100 % compare
  5. 1 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 100 % compare
  6. 1 Austria 100 % compare
  7. 1 Azerbaijan 100 % compare
  8. 1 Bahrain 100 % compare
  9. 1 Barbados 100 % compare
  10. 1 Belarus 100 % compare
  11. 1 Belgium 100 % compare
  12. 1 Belgium-Luxembourg 100 % compare
  13. 1 Botswana 100 % compare
  14. 1 British Virgin Islands 100 % compare
  15. 1 Bulgaria 100 % compare
  16. 1 Burkina Faso 100 % compare
  17. 1 Burundi 100 % compare
  18. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 % compare
  19. 1 China, Macao SAR 100 % compare
  20. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 100 % compare
  21. 1 Comoros 100 % compare
  22. 1 Cook Islands 100 % compare
  23. 1 Croatia 100 % compare
  24. 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
  25. 1 Czechia 100 % compare
  26. 1 Denmark 100 % compare
  27. 1 Djibouti 100 % compare
  28. 1 Dominica 100 % compare
  29. 1 Egypt 100 % compare
  30. 1 Eritrea 100 % compare
  31. 1 Estonia 100 % compare
  32. 1 Finland 100 % compare
  33. 1 Gambia 100 % compare
  34. 1 Germany 100 % compare
  35. 1 Grenada 100 % compare
  36. 1 Haiti 100 % compare
  37. 1 Hungary 100 % compare
  38. 1 Iceland 100 % compare
  39. 1 Iraq 100 % compare
  40. 1 Ireland 100 % compare
  41. 1 Israel 100 % compare
  42. 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
  43. 1 Jordan 100 % compare
  44. 1 Kazakhstan 100 % compare
  45. 1 Kiribati 100 % compare
  46. 1 Kuwait 100 % compare
  47. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
  48. 1 Latvia 100 % compare
  49. 1 Lebanon 100 % compare
  50. 1 Lesotho 100 % compare
  51. 1 Libya 100 % compare
  52. 1 Lithuania 100 % compare
  53. 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
  54. 1 Maldives 100 % compare
  55. 1 Mali 100 % compare
  56. 1 Malta 100 % compare
  57. 1 Marshall Islands 100 % compare
  58. 1 Mauritania 100 % compare
  59. 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
  60. 1 Mongolia 100 % compare
  61. 1 Montenegro 100 % compare
  62. 1 Nauru 100 % compare
  63. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
  64. 1 Netherlands Antilles (former) 100 % compare
  65. 1 New Zealand 100 % compare
  66. 1 Niger 100 % compare
  67. 1 Niue 100 % compare
  68. 1 North Macedonia 100 % compare
  69. 1 Norway 100 % compare
  70. 1 Oman 100 % compare
  71. 1 Pakistan 100 % compare
  72. 1 Palau 100 % compare
  73. 1 Poland 100 % compare
  74. 1 Qatar 100 % compare
  75. 1 Republic of Korea 100 % compare
  76. 1 Romania 100 % compare
  77. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
  78. 1 Saint Lucia 100 % compare
  79. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 % compare
  80. 1 Samoa 100 % compare
  81. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100 % compare
  82. 1 Saudi Arabia 100 % compare
  83. 1 Serbia 100 % compare
  84. 1 Serbia and Montenegro 100 % compare
  85. 1 Seychelles 100 % compare
  86. 1 Singapore 100 % compare
  87. 1 Slovakia 100 % compare
  88. 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
  89. 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
  90. 1 Somalia 100 % compare
  91. 1 Sri Lanka 100 % compare
  92. 1 Sudan 100 % compare
  93. 1 Sweden 100 % compare
  94. 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
  95. 1 Tajikistan 100 % compare
  96. 1 Tokelau 100 % compare
  97. 1 Tonga 100 % compare
  98. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 100 % compare
  99. 1 Turkmenistan 100 % compare
  100. 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 100 % compare
  101. 1 Tuvalu 100 % compare
  102. 1 United Arab Emirates 100 % compare
  103. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
  104. 1 Uruguay 100 % compare
  105. 1 Uzbekistan 100 % compare
  106. 1 Vanuatu 100 % compare
  107. 1 Yemen 100 % compare

See the full ranking of 243 places β†’

More climate change data for Republic of Moldova

All data for Republic of Moldova β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in Republic of Moldova?
All sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share in Republic of Moldova was 100 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2000.
What is the lowest all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share recorded in Republic of Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 99.65 % in 2014.
How does Republic of Moldova rank for all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share?
Republic of Moldova ranks 1st out of 20 regions with data for 2023.
Is all sectors without lulucf β€” emissions share rising or falling in Republic of Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Republic of Moldova data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CH4). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 32 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in Republic of Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-ch4/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-ch4/republic-of-moldova/">All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share in Republic of Moldova</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF β€” Emissions Share (CH4)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.