All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share in Turks and Caicos Islands
Turks and Caicos Islands: All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share was 100 % in 2023. β¬ Flat
Latest (2023)
100 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 187 countries
All-time high
100 %
in 1990
All-time low
85.71 %
in 1996
Years of data
34
1990β2023
All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share in Turks and Caicos Islands, 1990β2023
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.
Analysis
The most recent figure for all sectors without lulucf β emissions share in Turks and Caicos Islands is 100 %, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 34 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, all sectors without lulucf β emissions share in Turks and Caicos Islands peaked at 100 % in 1990 and was at its lowest, 85.71 %, in 1996.
Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st of 187 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.37 % | 85.71 % | 100 % | 10 |
| 2000s | 99.55 % | 95.45 % | 100 % | 10 |
| 2010s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 10 |
| 2020s | 100 % | 100 % | 100 % | 4 |
Countries ranked near Turks and Caicos Islands
- 1 Afghanistan 100 % compare
- 1 Anguilla 100 % compare
- 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100 % compare
- 1 Aruba 100 % compare
- 1 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 100 % compare
- 1 Austria 100 % compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 100 % compare
- 1 Bahrain 100 % compare
- 1 Barbados 100 % compare
- 1 Belarus 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium 100 % compare
- 1 Belgium-Luxembourg 100 % compare
- 1 Botswana 100 % compare
- 1 British Virgin Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Bulgaria 100 % compare
- 1 Burkina Faso 100 % compare
- 1 Burundi 100 % compare
- 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 % compare
- 1 China, Macao SAR 100 % compare
- 1 China, Taiwan Province of 100 % compare
- 1 Comoros 100 % compare
- 1 Cook Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Croatia 100 % compare
- 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
- 1 Czechia 100 % compare
- 1 Denmark 100 % compare
- 1 Djibouti 100 % compare
- 1 Dominica 100 % compare
- 1 Egypt 100 % compare
- 1 Eritrea 100 % compare
- 1 Estonia 100 % compare
- 1 Finland 100 % compare
- 1 Gambia 100 % compare
- 1 Germany 100 % compare
- 1 Grenada 100 % compare
- 1 Hungary 100 % compare
- 1 Iceland 100 % compare
- 1 Iraq 100 % compare
- 1 Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Israel 100 % compare
- 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
- 1 Jordan 100 % compare
- 1 Kiribati 100 % compare
- 1 Kuwait 100 % compare
- 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
- 1 Latvia 100 % compare
- 1 Lebanon 100 % compare
- 1 Lesotho 100 % compare
- 1 Libya 100 % compare
- 1 Lithuania 100 % compare
- 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
- 1 Maldives 100 % compare
- 1 Mali 100 % compare
- 1 Malta 100 % compare
- 1 Marshall Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Mauritania 100 % compare
- 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
- 1 Mongolia 100 % compare
- 1 Montenegro 100 % compare
- 1 Nauru 100 % compare
- 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
- 1 Netherlands Antilles (former) 100 % compare
- 1 Niger 100 % compare
- 1 Niue 100 % compare
- 1 Norway 100 % compare
- 1 Oman 100 % compare
- 1 Pakistan 100 % compare
- 1 Palau 100 % compare
- 1 Poland 100 % compare
- 1 Qatar 100 % compare
- 1 Romania 100 % compare
- 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
- 1 Saint Lucia 100 % compare
- 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 % compare
- 1 Samoa 100 % compare
- 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100 % compare
- 1 Saudi Arabia 100 % compare
- 1 Serbia 100 % compare
- 1 Serbia and Montenegro 100 % compare
- 1 Seychelles 100 % compare
- 1 Singapore 100 % compare
- 1 Slovak Republic 100 % compare
- 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
- 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
- 1 Somalia 100 % compare
- 1 Sri Lanka 100 % compare
- 1 Sweden 100 % compare
- 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
- 1 Tajikistan 100 % compare
- 1 Tokelau 100 % compare
- 1 Tonga 100 % compare
- 1 Trinidad and Tobago 100 % compare
- 1 Turkmenistan 100 % compare
- 1 Tuvalu 100 % compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 % compare
- 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
- 1 Uzbekistan 100 % compare
- 1 Vanuatu 100 % compare
- 1 Yemen 100 % compare
More climate change data for Turks and Caicos Islands
- Share co2 vs population 0.0004 (2100)
- Urban population 94.4% (2025)
- Urban population 44,229 (2025)
- Urban population growth 0.9% (2025)
- Population, total 46,855 (2025)
- Population growth 0.7% (2025)
- Annual Net Emissions/Removals 0.2378 (2024)
- Temperature change with respect to a baseline climatology 0.391 (1980)
- Per capita COβ emissions vs. per capita energy use 8.14 tonnes per person (2024)
- Co2 per capita marimekko 8.14 (2024)
Frequently asked questions
- What is all sectors without lulucf β emissions share in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- All sectors without lulucf β emissions share in Turks and Caicos Islands was 100 % in 2023, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest all sectors without lulucf β emissions share recorded in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- The highest recorded value was 100 % in 1990.
- What is the lowest all sectors without lulucf β emissions share recorded in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- The lowest recorded value was 85.71 % in 1996.
- How does Turks and Caicos Islands rank for all sectors without lulucf β emissions share?
- Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 1st out of 187 countries with data for 2023.
- Is all sectors without lulucf β emissions share rising or falling in Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Turks and Caicos Islands data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of All sectors without LULUCF β Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV Β· JSON β 34 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.