Statizoid

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share in Serbia and Montenegro

Serbia and Montenegro: All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share was 100 % in 2005. ▬ Flat

Latest (2005)
100 %
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 192 countries
All-time high
100 %
in 2001
All-time low
99.46 %
in 2000
Years of data
14
1992–2005

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share in Serbia and Montenegro, 1992–2005

0204060801001992199820051992: 100 %1993: 100 %1994: 100 %1995: 100 %1996: 99.9 %1997: 99.9 %1998: 99.8 %1999: 99.8 %2000: 99.5 %2001: 100 %2002: 100 %2003: 100 %2004: 100 %2005: 100 %

Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in %.

Analysis

In 2005, all sectors without lulucf — emissions share in Serbia and Montenegro stood at 100 %. That is the highest value across all 14 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, all sectors without lulucf — emissions share in Serbia and Montenegro peaked at 100 % in 2001 and was at its lowest, 99.46 %, in 2000.

Serbia and Montenegro ranks 1st of 192 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share in Serbia and Montenegro, year by year

Year % Change
1992 99.98 % —
1993 99.98 % +0.0%
1994 99.98 % +0.0%
1995 99.98 % +0.0%
1996 99.87 % -0.1%
1997 99.88 % +0.0%
1998 99.78 % -0.1%
1999 99.85 % +0.1%
2000 99.46 % -0.4%
2001 100 % +0.5%
2002 99.96 % -0.0%
2003 99.97 % +0.0%
2004 100 % +0.0%
2005 100 % +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 99.91 % 99.78 % 99.98 % 8
2000s 99.9 % 99.46 % 100 % 6

Countries ranked near Serbia and Montenegro

  1. 1 Afghanistan 100 % compare
  2. 1 Anguilla 100 % compare
  3. 1 Antigua and Barbuda 100 % compare
  4. 1 Aruba 100 % compare
  5. 1 Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha 100 % compare
  6. 1 Austria 100 % compare
  7. 1 Azerbaijan 100 % compare
  8. 1 Bahrain 100 % compare
  9. 1 Barbados 100 % compare
  10. 1 Belarus 100 % compare
  11. 1 Belgium 100 % compare
  12. 1 Belgium-Luxembourg 100 % compare
  13. 1 Botswana 100 % compare
  14. 1 British Virgin Islands 100 % compare
  15. 1 Bulgaria 100 % compare
  16. 1 Burkina Faso 100 % compare
  17. 1 Burundi 100 % compare
  18. 1 China, Hong Kong SAR 100 % compare
  19. 1 China, Macao SAR 100 % compare
  20. 1 China, Taiwan Province of 100 % compare
  21. 1 Comoros 100 % compare
  22. 1 Cook Islands 100 % compare
  23. 1 Croatia 100 % compare
  24. 1 Cyprus 100 % compare
  25. 1 Czechia 100 % compare
  26. 1 Denmark 100 % compare
  27. 1 Djibouti 100 % compare
  28. 1 Dominica 100 % compare
  29. 1 Egypt 100 % compare
  30. 1 Eritrea 100 % compare
  31. 1 Estonia 100 % compare
  32. 1 Finland 100 % compare
  33. 1 Gambia 100 % compare
  34. 1 Germany 100 % compare
  35. 1 Grenada 100 % compare
  36. 1 Hungary 100 % compare
  37. 1 Iceland 100 % compare
  38. 1 Iraq 100 % compare
  39. 1 Ireland 100 % compare
  40. 1 Israel 100 % compare
  41. 1 Jamaica 100 % compare
  42. 1 Jordan 100 % compare
  43. 1 Kiribati 100 % compare
  44. 1 Kuwait 100 % compare
  45. 1 Kyrgyzstan 100 % compare
  46. 1 Latvia 100 % compare
  47. 1 Lebanon 100 % compare
  48. 1 Lesotho 100 % compare
  49. 1 Libya 100 % compare
  50. 1 Lithuania 100 % compare
  51. 1 Luxembourg 100 % compare
  52. 1 Maldives 100 % compare
  53. 1 Mali 100 % compare
  54. 1 Malta 100 % compare
  55. 1 Marshall Islands 100 % compare
  56. 1 Mauritania 100 % compare
  57. 1 Mauritius 100 % compare
  58. 1 Mongolia 100 % compare
  59. 1 Montenegro 100 %
  60. 1 Naoero 100 % compare
  61. 1 Netherlands (Kingdom of the) 100 % compare
  62. 1 Netherlands Antilles (former) 100 % compare
  63. 1 Niger 100 % compare
  64. 1 Niue 100 % compare
  65. 1 Norway 100 % compare
  66. 1 Oman 100 % compare
  67. 1 Pakistan 100 % compare
  68. 1 Palau 100 % compare
  69. 1 Poland 100 % compare
  70. 1 Qatar 100 % compare
  71. 1 Romania 100 % compare
  72. 1 Saint Kitts and Nevis 100 % compare
  73. 1 Saint Lucia 100 % compare
  74. 1 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 100 % compare
  75. 1 Samoa 100 % compare
  76. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 100 % compare
  77. 1 Saudi Arabia 100 % compare
  78. 1 Serbia 100 %
  79. 1 Seychelles 100 % compare
  80. 1 Singapore 100 % compare
  81. 1 Slovakia 100 % compare
  82. 1 Slovenia 100 % compare
  83. 1 Solomon Islands 100 % compare
  84. 1 Somalia 100 % compare
  85. 1 Sri Lanka 100 % compare
  86. 1 Sweden 100 % compare
  87. 1 Switzerland 100 % compare
  88. 1 Tajikistan 100 % compare
  89. 1 Tokelau 100 % compare
  90. 1 Tonga 100 % compare
  91. 1 Trinidad and Tobago 100 % compare
  92. 1 Turkmenistan 100 % compare
  93. 1 Turks and Caicos Islands 100 % compare
  94. 1 Tuvalu 100 % compare
  95. 1 United Arab Emirates 100 % compare
  96. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 100 % compare
  97. 1 Uzbekistan 100 % compare
  98. 1 Vanuatu 100 % compare
  99. 1 Yemen 100 % compare

See the full ranking of 243 places →

More climate change data for Serbia and Montenegro

All data for Serbia and Montenegro →

Frequently asked questions

What is all sectors without lulucf — emissions share in Serbia and Montenegro?
All sectors without lulucf — emissions share in Serbia and Montenegro was 100 % in 2005, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
What is the highest all sectors without lulucf — emissions share recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
The highest recorded value was 100 % in 2001.
What is the lowest all sectors without lulucf — emissions share recorded in Serbia and Montenegro?
The lowest recorded value was 99.46 % in 2000.
How does Serbia and Montenegro rank for all sectors without lulucf — emissions share?
Serbia and Montenegro ranks 1st out of 192 countries with data for 2005.
Is all sectors without lulucf — emissions share rising or falling in Serbia and Montenegro?
Over the last ten years it is up 0.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Serbia and Montenegro data come from?
The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (N2O). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share in Serbia and Montenegro. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-n2o/serbia-and-montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/all-sectors-without-lulucf-emissions-share-n2o/serbia-and-montenegro/">All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share in Serbia and Montenegro</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
All sectors without LULUCF — Emissions Share (N2O)
Unit
%
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
243 places, 8,018 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions indicators disseminates indicators on sectoral shares of total national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as well as three indicators of emissions intensity: per capita emissions; emissions per value of agricultural production; and emissions per area of agricultural land.