Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini
Eswatini: Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate was -9.47 % change on previous year in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-9.47 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 14.3%
World rank
156th
of 188 countries
All-time high
770.21 % change on previous year
in 1977
All-time low
-282.68 % change on previous year
in 1980
Years of data
173
1851–2024
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini, 1851–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini is -9.47 % change on previous year, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 14.3% on the previous year and up 58.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini peaked at 770.21 % change on previous year in 1977 and was at its lowest, -282.68 % change on previous year, in 1980.
Eswatini ranks 156th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 22.12 % change on previous year | — |
| 1852 | 5.29 % change on previous year | -76.1% |
| 1853 | 1.82 % change on previous year | -65.6% |
| 1854 | 3.03 % change on previous year | +67.1% |
| 1855 | 2.19 % change on previous year | -27.9% |
| 1856 | 2.17 % change on previous year | -0.8% |
| 1857 | 1.26 % change on previous year | -42.1% |
| 1858 | 3.73 % change on previous year | +196.3% |
| 1859 | 1.58 % change on previous year | -57.6% |
| 1860 | 9.81 % change on previous year | +521.3% |
| 1861 | 2.39 % change on previous year | -75.6% |
| 1862 | -2.02 % change on previous year | -184.4% |
| 1863 | 4.27 % change on previous year | -311.3% |
| 1864 | 0.249 % change on previous year | -94.2% |
| 1865 | -0.6363 % change on previous year | -355.5% |
| 1866 | 1.69 % change on previous year | -365.0% |
| 1867 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -38.1% |
| 1868 | -1.72 % change on previous year | -264.4% |
| 1869 | -0.0696 % change on previous year | -95.9% |
| 1870 | 15.82 % change on previous year | -22821.6% |
| 1871 | 8.39 % change on previous year | -47.0% |
| 1872 | 5.26 % change on previous year | -37.3% |
| 1873 | -0.8314 % change on previous year | -115.8% |
| 1874 | 1.65 % change on previous year | -298.8% |
| 1875 | 4.02 % change on previous year | +143.1% |
| 1876 | 2.12 % change on previous year | -47.3% |
| 1877 | -0.8257 % change on previous year | -139.0% |
| 1878 | -1.33 % change on previous year | +60.9% |
| 1879 | 1.16 % change on previous year | -187.1% |
| 1880 | -6.51 % change on previous year | -662.5% |
| 1881 | -4.6 % change on previous year | -29.4% |
| 1882 | 2.76 % change on previous year | -160.0% |
| 1883 | -4.89 % change on previous year | -277.6% |
| 1884 | -0.8808 % change on previous year | -82.0% |
| 1885 | 2.2 % change on previous year | -349.7% |
| 1886 | -3.85 % change on previous year | -275.2% |
| 1887 | -1.52 % change on previous year | -60.7% |
| 1888 | -0.7268 % change on previous year | -52.1% |
| 1889 | 7.3 % change on previous year | -1104.4% |
| 1890 | 11.7 % change on previous year | +60.2% |
| 1891 | 3.28 % change on previous year | -71.9% |
| 1892 | 0.5106 % change on previous year | -84.4% |
| 1893 | 0.5937 % change on previous year | +16.3% |
| 1894 | 0.1277 % change on previous year | -78.5% |
| 1895 | 5.54 % change on previous year | +4241.3% |
| 1896 | -1.41 % change on previous year | -125.4% |
| 1897 | 0.8115 % change on previous year | -157.6% |
| 1898 | -0.6025 % change on previous year | -174.3% |
| 1899 | 0.0866 % change on previous year | -114.4% |
| 1900 | 29.08 % change on previous year | +33482.2% |
| 1901 | 13.07 % change on previous year | -55.1% |
| 1902 | 4.17 % change on previous year | -68.1% |
| 1903 | 2.87 % change on previous year | -31.2% |
| 1904 | 2.02 % change on previous year | -29.4% |
| 1905 | 1.7 % change on previous year | -16.2% |
| 1906 | 6.02 % change on previous year | +254.9% |
| 1907 | -1.02 % change on previous year | -116.9% |
| 1908 | 3.41 % change on previous year | -434.2% |
| 1909 | -2.09 % change on previous year | -161.3% |
| 1910 | 8.15 % change on previous year | -490.0% |
| 1911 | 3.95 % change on previous year | -51.5% |
| 1912 | 2.99 % change on previous year | -24.4% |
| 1913 | 1.52 % change on previous year | -49.2% |
| 1914 | 2.15 % change on previous year | +41.9% |
| 1915 | 1.35 % change on previous year | -37.1% |
| 1916 | -0.0582 % change on previous year | -104.3% |
| 1917 | -0.1285 % change on previous year | +120.6% |
| 1918 | -1.55 % change on previous year | +1108.8% |
| 1919 | 2.38 % change on previous year | -253.2% |
| 1920 | 23 % change on previous year | +866.9% |
| 1921 | 11.83 % change on previous year | -48.6% |
| 1922 | 4.1 % change on previous year | -65.3% |
| 1923 | 2.96 % change on previous year | -27.9% |
| 1924 | 3.34 % change on previous year | +12.8% |
| 1925 | 2.75 % change on previous year | -17.6% |
| 1926 | -0.3556 % change on previous year | -112.9% |
| 1927 | 2.09 % change on previous year | -688.1% |
| 1928 | 2.81 % change on previous year | +34.4% |
| 1929 | -1.04 % change on previous year | -137.0% |
| 1930 | -34.23 % change on previous year | +3192.3% |
| 1931 | -24.73 % change on previous year | -27.8% |
| 1932 | -19.8 % change on previous year | -19.9% |
| 1933 | -16.86 % change on previous year | -14.9% |
| 1934 | -14.3 % change on previous year | -15.2% |
| 1935 | -13.07 % change on previous year | -8.6% |
| 1936 | -11.45 % change on previous year | -12.4% |
| 1937 | -10.45 % change on previous year | -8.8% |
| 1938 | -10.09 % change on previous year | -3.5% |
| 1939 | -9.6 % change on previous year | -4.9% |
| 1940 | 725.74 % change on previous year | -7662.8% |
| 1941 | 41.15 % change on previous year | -94.3% |
| 1942 | 18.3 % change on previous year | -55.5% |
| 1943 | 10.42 % change on previous year | -43.1% |
| 1944 | 8.9 % change on previous year | -14.6% |
| 1945 | 5.16 % change on previous year | -42.0% |
| 1946 | 4.72 % change on previous year | -8.5% |
| 1947 | 3.11 % change on previous year | -34.2% |
| 1948 | 0.8341 % change on previous year | -73.2% |
| 1949 | 2.54 % change on previous year | +204.5% |
| 1950 | -17.97 % change on previous year | -807.6% |
| 1951 | -6.62 % change on previous year | -63.2% |
| 1952 | 0.4532 % change on previous year | -106.8% |
| 1953 | -3.17 % change on previous year | -800.3% |
| 1954 | 2.44 % change on previous year | -176.8% |
| 1955 | 0.645 % change on previous year | -73.5% |
| 1956 | 3 % change on previous year | +365.5% |
| 1957 | -1.48 % change on previous year | -149.4% |
| 1958 | -0.0366 % change on previous year | -97.5% |
| 1959 | 15.76 % change on previous year | -43113.1% |
| 1960 | -30.8 % change on previous year | -295.5% |
| 1961 | -5.97 % change on previous year | -80.6% |
| 1962 | -29.28 % change on previous year | +390.6% |
| 1963 | -13.83 % change on previous year | -52.7% |
| 1964 | 9.39 % change on previous year | -167.8% |
| 1965 | 7.25 % change on previous year | -22.8% |
| 1966 | -4.22 % change on previous year | -158.2% |
| 1967 | -21 % change on previous year | +397.6% |
| 1968 | -25.87 % change on previous year | +23.2% |
| 1969 | -13.94 % change on previous year | -46.1% |
| 1970 | 5.58 % change on previous year | -140.1% |
| 1971 | 93.75 % change on previous year | +1578.7% |
| 1972 | -13.18 % change on previous year | -114.1% |
| 1973 | -47.77 % change on previous year | +262.4% |
| 1974 | -8.02 % change on previous year | -83.2% |
| 1975 | -27.95 % change on previous year | +248.7% |
| 1976 | -55.28 % change on previous year | +97.8% |
| 1977 | 770.21 % change on previous year | -1493.2% |
| 1978 | -51.1 % change on previous year | -106.6% |
| 1979 | -47.01 % change on previous year | -8.0% |
| 1980 | -282.68 % change on previous year | +501.3% |
| 1981 | 64.84 % change on previous year | -122.9% |
| 1982 | 55.55 % change on previous year | -14.3% |
| 1984 | -59.1 % change on previous year | -206.4% |
| 1985 | 94.95 % change on previous year | -260.7% |
| 1986 | 29.35 % change on previous year | -69.1% |
| 1987 | 2.31 % change on previous year | -92.1% |
| 1988 | 25.15 % change on previous year | +987.3% |
| 1989 | -32.15 % change on previous year | -227.8% |
| 1990 | -6.16 % change on previous year | -80.8% |
| 1991 | -18 % change on previous year | +192.1% |
| 1992 | -10.6 % change on previous year | -41.1% |
| 1993 | -10.84 % change on previous year | +2.2% |
| 1994 | -7.99 % change on previous year | -26.3% |
| 1995 | -4.09 % change on previous year | -48.8% |
| 1996 | -3.33 % change on previous year | -18.6% |
| 1997 | -14.46 % change on previous year | +334.6% |
| 1998 | -17.02 % change on previous year | +17.7% |
| 1999 | 7.55 % change on previous year | -144.3% |
| 2000 | -4.08 % change on previous year | -154.0% |
| 2001 | 3.28 % change on previous year | -180.5% |
| 2002 | -9.55 % change on previous year | -390.7% |
| 2003 | -1.36 % change on previous year | -85.7% |
| 2004 | 0.6868 % change on previous year | -150.4% |
| 2005 | -27.06 % change on previous year | -4040.1% |
| 2006 | 5.67 % change on previous year | -121.0% |
| 2007 | -1.91 % change on previous year | -133.7% |
| 2008 | -6.19 % change on previous year | +224.2% |
| 2009 | -2.12 % change on previous year | -65.8% |
| 2010 | -0.4569 % change on previous year | -78.4% |
| 2011 | 7.62 % change on previous year | -1767.7% |
| 2012 | -19.35 % change on previous year | -354.0% |
| 2013 | -6.11 % change on previous year | -68.4% |
| 2014 | -23.03 % change on previous year | +276.7% |
| 2015 | -4.55 % change on previous year | -80.2% |
| 2016 | 78.2 % change on previous year | -1818.6% |
| 2017 | 19.31 % change on previous year | -75.3% |
| 2018 | -1.1 % change on previous year | -105.7% |
| 2019 | 8.76 % change on previous year | -898.9% |
| 2020 | -46.76 % change on previous year | -633.9% |
| 2021 | -27.65 % change on previous year | -40.9% |
| 2022 | -14.79 % change on previous year | -46.5% |
| 2023 | -11.05 % change on previous year | -25.3% |
| 2024 | -9.47 % change on previous year | -14.3% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's -9.47 % change on previous year is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.5969 % change on previous year. (46 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's -9.47 % change on previous year is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.5717 % change on previous year. (47 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1959 | +43113.1% | -0.0366 % change on previous year | 15.76 % change on previous year |
| 1900 | +33482.2% | 0.0866 % change on previous year | 29.08 % change on previous year |
| 1870 | +22821.6% | -0.0696 % change on previous year | 15.82 % change on previous year |
| 1940 | +7662.8% | -9.6 % change on previous year | 725.74 % change on previous year |
| 1895 | +4241.3% | 0.1277 % change on previous year | 5.54 % change on previous year |
| 2005 | -4040.1% | 0.6868 % change on previous year | -27.06 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 4.8 % change on previous year | 1.26 % change on previous year | 22.12 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1860s | 1.5 % change on previous year | -2.02 % change on previous year | 9.81 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 3.54 % change on previous year | -1.33 % change on previous year | 15.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | -1.07 % change on previous year | -6.51 % change on previous year | 7.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.06 % change on previous year | -1.41 % change on previous year | 11.7 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 5.92 % change on previous year | -2.09 % change on previous year | 29.08 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | 2.08 % change on previous year | -1.55 % change on previous year | 8.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 5.15 % change on previous year | -1.04 % change on previous year | 23 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -16.46 % change on previous year | -34.23 % change on previous year | -9.6 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 82.09 % change on previous year | 0.8341 % change on previous year | 725.74 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | -0.6986 % change on previous year | -17.97 % change on previous year | 15.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | -12.83 % change on previous year | -30.8 % change on previous year | 9.39 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | 61.92 % change on previous year | -55.28 % change on previous year | 770.21 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -11.31 % change on previous year | -282.68 % change on previous year | 94.95 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1990s | -8.49 % change on previous year | -18 % change on previous year | 7.55 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -4.26 % change on previous year | -27.06 % change on previous year | 5.67 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.93 % change on previous year | -23.03 % change on previous year | 78.2 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -21.94 % change on previous year | -46.76 % change on previous year | -9.47 % change on previous year | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 153 France -8.05 % change on previous year compare
- 154 Slovenia -8.89 % change on previous year compare
- 155 Laos -9.15 % change on previous year compare
- 157 Pakistan -9.73 % change on previous year compare
- 158 New Zealand -10.87 % change on previous year compare
- 159 Sweden -12.14 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Eswatini
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 10.39 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,459 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 469.92 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 988.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 35.32 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 77.58 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 66.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2521 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini?
- Annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate in Eswatini was -9.47 % change on previous year in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 770.21 % change on previous year in 1977.
- What is the lowest annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -282.68 % change on previous year in 1980.
- How does Eswatini rank for annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate?
- Eswatini ranks 156th out of 188 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 58.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 173 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change Global Carbon Budget (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Annual CO₂ emissions from land-use change. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.