Annual co2 including land use in Belarus
Belarus: Annual co2 including land use was 52.30 million in 2024. ▲ Rising
Annual co2 including land use in Belarus, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co2 including land use in Belarus is 52.30 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.0% on the previous year and down 21.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Belarus peaked at 139.35 million in 1986 and was at its lowest, 38.53 million, in 1855.
That places Belarus 65th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 169 years of available data.
Annual co2 including land use in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 39.18 million | — |
| 1855 | 38.53 million | -1.7% |
| 1858 | 38.65 million | +0.3% |
| 1859 | 39.02 million | +1.0% |
| 1860 | 39.04 million | +0.1% |
| 1861 | 39.12 million | +0.2% |
| 1862 | 39.45 million | +0.8% |
| 1863 | 39.22 million | -0.6% |
| 1864 | 39.32 million | +0.3% |
| 1865 | 39.44 million | +0.3% |
| 1866 | 39.51 million | +0.2% |
| 1867 | 39.67 million | +0.4% |
| 1868 | 39.62 million | -0.1% |
| 1869 | 39.92 million | +0.7% |
| 1870 | 40.49 million | +1.4% |
| 1871 | 40.57 million | +0.2% |
| 1872 | 40.22 million | -0.9% |
| 1873 | 40.14 million | -0.2% |
| 1874 | 40.35 million | +0.5% |
| 1875 | 40.36 million | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 40.46 million | +0.2% |
| 1877 | 40.55 million | +0.2% |
| 1878 | 41.00 million | +1.1% |
| 1879 | 41.13 million | +0.3% |
| 1880 | 41.09 million | -0.1% |
| 1881 | 41.01 million | -0.2% |
| 1882 | 41.44 million | +1.0% |
| 1883 | 41.63 million | +0.5% |
| 1884 | 41.67 million | +0.1% |
| 1885 | 41.41 million | -0.6% |
| 1886 | 41.73 million | +0.8% |
| 1887 | 41.92 million | +0.5% |
| 1888 | 41.94 million | +0.0% |
| 1889 | 42.24 million | +0.7% |
| 1890 | 42.53 million | +0.7% |
| 1891 | 41.81 million | -1.7% |
| 1892 | 42.20 million | +0.9% |
| 1893 | 42.15 million | -0.1% |
| 1894 | 42.36 million | +0.5% |
| 1895 | 42.47 million | +0.2% |
| 1896 | 42.49 million | +0.1% |
| 1897 | 42.57 million | +0.2% |
| 1898 | 42.90 million | +0.8% |
| 1899 | 43.08 million | +0.4% |
| 1900 | 44.30 million | +2.8% |
| 1901 | 44.79 million | +1.1% |
| 1902 | 44.55 million | -0.5% |
| 1903 | 44.00 million | -1.2% |
| 1904 | 44.52 million | +1.2% |
| 1905 | 44.48 million | -0.1% |
| 1906 | 44.52 million | +0.1% |
| 1907 | 45.09 million | +1.3% |
| 1908 | 45.25 million | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 45.70 million | +1.0% |
| 1910 | 43.75 million | -4.3% |
| 1911 | 43.47 million | -0.6% |
| 1912 | 43.53 million | +0.1% |
| 1913 | 43.74 million | +0.5% |
| 1914 | 43.43 million | -0.7% |
| 1915 | 43.00 million | -1.0% |
| 1916 | 42.78 million | -0.5% |
| 1917 | 42.76 million | -0.0% |
| 1918 | 41.04 million | -4.0% |
| 1919 | 40.35 million | -1.7% |
| 1920 | 41.33 million | +2.4% |
| 1921 | 40.98 million | -0.9% |
| 1922 | 41.36 million | +0.9% |
| 1923 | 41.12 million | -0.6% |
| 1924 | 41.44 million | +0.8% |
| 1925 | 41.70 million | +0.6% |
| 1926 | 42.38 million | +1.6% |
| 1927 | 43.01 million | +1.5% |
| 1928 | 43.36 million | +0.8% |
| 1929 | 43.74 million | +0.9% |
| 1930 | 45.52 million | +4.1% |
| 1931 | 46.31 million | +1.7% |
| 1932 | 47.34 million | +2.2% |
| 1933 | 47.82 million | +1.0% |
| 1934 | 49.69 million | +3.9% |
| 1935 | 50.37 million | +1.4% |
| 1936 | 52.80 million | +4.8% |
| 1937 | 52.51 million | -0.5% |
| 1938 | 53.56 million | +2.0% |
| 1939 | 53.95 million | +0.7% |
| 1940 | 53.49 million | -0.9% |
| 1941 | 51.00 million | -4.7% |
| 1942 | 45.28 million | -11.2% |
| 1943 | 45.68 million | +0.9% |
| 1944 | 48.17 million | +5.4% |
| 1945 | 47.96 million | -0.4% |
| 1946 | 49.20 million | +2.6% |
| 1947 | 51.02 million | +3.7% |
| 1948 | 51.42 million | +0.8% |
| 1949 | 53.22 million | +3.5% |
| 1950 | 48.36 million | -9.1% |
| 1951 | 47.04 million | -2.7% |
| 1952 | 47.54 million | +1.1% |
| 1953 | 47.87 million | +0.7% |
| 1954 | 51.11 million | +6.8% |
| 1955 | 56.36 million | +10.3% |
| 1956 | 61.11 million | +8.4% |
| 1957 | 65.75 million | +7.6% |
| 1958 | 68.70 million | +4.5% |
| 1959 | 71.62 million | +4.2% |
| 1960 | 68.06 million | -5.0% |
| 1961 | 71.17 million | +4.6% |
| 1962 | 68.23 million | -4.1% |
| 1963 | 69.89 million | +2.4% |
| 1964 | 73.74 million | +5.5% |
| 1965 | 73.03 million | -1.0% |
| 1966 | 77.02 million | +5.5% |
| 1967 | 78.45 million | +1.9% |
| 1968 | 83.27 million | +6.1% |
| 1969 | 82.57 million | -0.8% |
| 1970 | 85.39 million | +3.4% |
| 1971 | 90.74 million | +6.3% |
| 1972 | 95.19 million | +4.9% |
| 1973 | 99.74 million | +4.8% |
| 1974 | 99.24 million | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 105.59 million | +6.4% |
| 1976 | 108.72 million | +3.0% |
| 1977 | 108.60 million | -0.1% |
| 1978 | 110.98 million | +2.2% |
| 1979 | 113.06 million | +1.9% |
| 1980 | 116.75 million | +3.3% |
| 1981 | 117.34 million | +0.5% |
| 1982 | 117.79 million | +0.4% |
| 1983 | 117.36 million | -0.4% |
| 1984 | 119.58 million | +1.9% |
| 1985 | 126.59 million | +5.9% |
| 1986 | 139.35 million | +10.1% |
| 1987 | 129.07 million | -7.4% |
| 1988 | 131.16 million | +1.6% |
| 1989 | 125.09 million | -4.6% |
| 1990 | 124.00 million | -0.9% |
| 1991 | 111.53 million | -10.1% |
| 1992 | 102.20 million | -8.4% |
| 1993 | 91.89 million | -10.1% |
| 1994 | 87.94 million | -4.3% |
| 1995 | 74.38 million | -15.4% |
| 1996 | 73.22 million | -1.6% |
| 1997 | 72.79 million | -0.6% |
| 1998 | 75.01 million | +3.0% |
| 1999 | 73.45 million | -2.1% |
| 2000 | 58.16 million | -20.8% |
| 2001 | 54.86 million | -5.7% |
| 2002 | 54.67 million | -0.3% |
| 2003 | 56.13 million | +2.7% |
| 2004 | 60.89 million | +8.5% |
| 2005 | 63.28 million | +3.9% |
| 2006 | 63.82 million | +0.9% |
| 2007 | 64.79 million | +1.5% |
| 2008 | 68.42 million | +5.6% |
| 2009 | 65.07 million | -4.9% |
| 2010 | 66.72 million | +2.5% |
| 2011 | 63.99 million | -4.1% |
| 2012 | 65.19 million | +1.9% |
| 2013 | 67.82 million | +4.0% |
| 2014 | 66.27 million | -2.3% |
| 2015 | 62.09 million | -6.3% |
| 2016 | 62.03 million | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 62.73 million | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 64.21 million | +2.4% |
| 2019 | 62.36 million | -2.9% |
| 2020 | 58.11 million | -6.8% |
| 2021 | 59.15 million | +1.8% |
| 2022 | 54.22 million | -8.3% |
| 2023 | 52.83 million | -2.6% |
| 2024 | 52.30 million | -1.0% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 52.30 million is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 2.1× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 52.30 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 1.6× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 38.84 million | 38.53 million | 39.18 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 39.43 million | 39.04 million | 39.92 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 40.53 million | 40.14 million | 41.13 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 41.61 million | 41.01 million | 42.24 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 42.46 million | 41.81 million | 43.08 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 44.72 million | 44.00 million | 45.70 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 42.79 million | 40.35 million | 43.75 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 42.04 million | 40.98 million | 43.74 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 49.99 million | 45.52 million | 53.95 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 49.64 million | 45.28 million | 53.49 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 56.54 million | 47.04 million | 71.62 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 74.54 million | 68.06 million | 83.27 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 101.73 million | 85.39 million | 113.06 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 124.01 million | 116.75 million | 139.35 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 88.64 million | 72.79 million | 124.00 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 61.01 million | 54.67 million | 68.42 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 64.34 million | 62.03 million | 67.82 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 55.32 million | 52.30 million | 59.15 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More climate change data for Belarus
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 644.33 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,124 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,377 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,748 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 348.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,092 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,078 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 15.39 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Belarus?
- Annual co2 including land use in Belarus was 52.30 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 139.35 million in 1986.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 38.53 million in 1855.
- How does Belarus rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Belarus ranks 65th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).