Annual co2 including land use in Chile
Chile: Annual co2 including land use was 88.32 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
88.32 million
Change on year
down 2.5%
World rank
49th
of 194 countries
All-time high
120.36 million
in 2016
All-time low
7.36 million
in 1850
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Chile, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, annual co2 including land use in Chile stood at 88.32 million.
The figure is down 2.5% on the previous year and down 23.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Chile peaked at 120.36 million in 2016 and was at its lowest, 7.36 million, in 1850.
That places Chile 49th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 7.36 million | — |
| 1851 | 8.91 million | +21.1% |
| 1852 | 9.21 million | +3.4% |
| 1853 | 9.44 million | +2.5% |
| 1854 | 9.60 million | +1.7% |
| 1855 | 9.33 million | -2.8% |
| 1856 | 10.00 million | +7.2% |
| 1857 | 10.68 million | +6.8% |
| 1858 | 12.27 million | +14.9% |
| 1859 | 11.32 million | -7.7% |
| 1860 | 11.74 million | +3.7% |
| 1861 | 11.77 million | +0.3% |
| 1862 | 11.89 million | +1.0% |
| 1863 | 12.08 million | +1.6% |
| 1864 | 12.48 million | +3.3% |
| 1865 | 12.89 million | +3.3% |
| 1866 | 12.06 million | -6.4% |
| 1867 | 13.62 million | +12.9% |
| 1868 | 14.17 million | +4.0% |
| 1869 | 12.74 million | -10.1% |
| 1870 | 15.29 million | +20.0% |
| 1871 | 13.73 million | -10.2% |
| 1872 | 13.98 million | +1.9% |
| 1873 | 16.28 million | +16.4% |
| 1874 | 15.16 million | -6.9% |
| 1875 | 17.93 million | +18.3% |
| 1876 | 17.52 million | -2.3% |
| 1877 | 18.13 million | +3.5% |
| 1878 | 16.60 million | -8.4% |
| 1879 | 16.39 million | -1.2% |
| 1880 | 17.01 million | +3.8% |
| 1881 | 17.61 million | +3.5% |
| 1882 | 18.76 million | +6.5% |
| 1883 | 18.57 million | -1.0% |
| 1884 | 19.11 million | +2.9% |
| 1885 | 19.40 million | +1.5% |
| 1886 | 18.62 million | -4.0% |
| 1887 | 19.06 million | +2.3% |
| 1888 | 20.73 million | +8.8% |
| 1889 | 20.73 million | +0.0% |
| 1890 | 21.74 million | +4.8% |
| 1891 | 25.07 million | +15.3% |
| 1892 | 23.31 million | -7.0% |
| 1893 | 23.71 million | +1.7% |
| 1894 | 26.22 million | +10.6% |
| 1895 | 27.59 million | +5.2% |
| 1896 | 26.22 million | -5.0% |
| 1897 | 23.10 million | -11.9% |
| 1898 | 22.07 million | -4.5% |
| 1899 | 24.14 million | +9.4% |
| 1900 | 26.62 million | +10.2% |
| 1901 | 27.22 million | +2.3% |
| 1902 | 27.01 million | -0.8% |
| 1903 | 27.91 million | +3.3% |
| 1904 | 29.09 million | +4.2% |
| 1905 | 30.61 million | +5.2% |
| 1906 | 33.29 million | +8.8% |
| 1907 | 36.12 million | +8.5% |
| 1908 | 37.34 million | +3.4% |
| 1909 | 36.11 million | -3.3% |
| 1910 | 39.02 million | +8.1% |
| 1911 | 34.92 million | -10.5% |
| 1912 | 35.55 million | +1.8% |
| 1913 | 36.62 million | +3.0% |
| 1914 | 37.94 million | +3.6% |
| 1915 | 36.10 million | -4.9% |
| 1916 | 42.27 million | +17.1% |
| 1917 | 42.80 million | +1.2% |
| 1918 | 38.38 million | -10.3% |
| 1919 | 39.21 million | +2.2% |
| 1920 | 38.85 million | -0.9% |
| 1921 | 37.51 million | -3.4% |
| 1922 | 34.86 million | -7.1% |
| 1923 | 35.36 million | +1.4% |
| 1924 | 36.40 million | +2.9% |
| 1925 | 37.64 million | +3.4% |
| 1926 | 36.73 million | -2.4% |
| 1927 | 38.66 million | +5.2% |
| 1928 | 40.94 million | +5.9% |
| 1929 | 40.66 million | -0.7% |
| 1930 | 42.83 million | +5.3% |
| 1931 | 42.74 million | -0.2% |
| 1932 | 46.38 million | +8.5% |
| 1933 | 43.43 million | -6.4% |
| 1934 | 44.87 million | +3.3% |
| 1935 | 46.23 million | +3.0% |
| 1936 | 46.98 million | +1.6% |
| 1937 | 49.12 million | +4.6% |
| 1938 | 45.38 million | -7.6% |
| 1939 | 44.86 million | -1.2% |
| 1940 | 46.31 million | +3.2% |
| 1941 | 44.80 million | -3.3% |
| 1942 | 42.19 million | -5.8% |
| 1943 | 44.70 million | +6.0% |
| 1944 | 46.03 million | +3.0% |
| 1945 | 46.58 million | +1.2% |
| 1946 | 43.80 million | -6.0% |
| 1947 | 43.67 million | -0.3% |
| 1948 | 44.83 million | +2.7% |
| 1949 | 46.72 million | +4.2% |
| 1950 | 47.62 million | +1.9% |
| 1951 | 46.41 million | -2.5% |
| 1952 | 45.55 million | -1.9% |
| 1953 | 46.58 million | +2.3% |
| 1954 | 48.82 million | +4.8% |
| 1955 | 50.99 million | +4.5% |
| 1956 | 52.32 million | +2.6% |
| 1957 | 55.09 million | +5.3% |
| 1958 | 55.56 million | +0.8% |
| 1959 | 57.21 million | +3.0% |
| 1960 | 58.09 million | +1.5% |
| 1961 | 50.97 million | -12.3% |
| 1962 | 51.37 million | +0.8% |
| 1963 | 50.23 million | -2.2% |
| 1964 | 50.47 million | +0.5% |
| 1965 | 49.01 million | -2.9% |
| 1966 | 49.92 million | +1.8% |
| 1967 | 49.49 million | -0.9% |
| 1968 | 51.86 million | +4.8% |
| 1969 | 61.76 million | +19.1% |
| 1970 | 61.68 million | -0.1% |
| 1971 | 65.30 million | +5.9% |
| 1972 | 73.50 million | +12.6% |
| 1973 | 74.10 million | +0.8% |
| 1974 | 65.92 million | -11.0% |
| 1975 | 76.00 million | +15.3% |
| 1976 | 59.19 million | -22.1% |
| 1977 | 50.32 million | -15.0% |
| 1978 | 45.56 million | -9.5% |
| 1979 | 44.46 million | -2.4% |
| 1980 | 43.02 million | -3.2% |
| 1981 | 36.30 million | -15.6% |
| 1982 | 30.71 million | -15.4% |
| 1983 | 30.82 million | +0.4% |
| 1984 | 32.41 million | +5.2% |
| 1985 | 30.68 million | -5.3% |
| 1986 | 26.04 million | -15.1% |
| 1987 | 28.08 million | +7.8% |
| 1988 | 36.11 million | +28.6% |
| 1989 | 34.45 million | -4.6% |
| 1990 | 33.61 million | -2.4% |
| 1991 | 29.00 million | -13.7% |
| 1992 | 30.48 million | +5.1% |
| 1993 | 41.39 million | +35.8% |
| 1994 | 41.41 million | +0.1% |
| 1995 | 46.52 million | +12.3% |
| 1996 | 54.92 million | +18.1% |
| 1997 | 71.31 million | +29.8% |
| 1998 | 68.12 million | -4.5% |
| 1999 | 74.72 million | +9.7% |
| 2000 | 81.41 million | +8.9% |
| 2001 | 79.18 million | -2.7% |
| 2002 | 74.36 million | -6.1% |
| 2003 | 86.55 million | +16.4% |
| 2004 | 85.29 million | -1.5% |
| 2005 | 89.72 million | +5.2% |
| 2006 | 88.91 million | -0.9% |
| 2007 | 102.15 million | +14.9% |
| 2008 | 107.75 million | +5.5% |
| 2009 | 100.24 million | -7.0% |
| 2010 | 110.12 million | +9.9% |
| 2011 | 113.15 million | +2.7% |
| 2012 | 117.91 million | +4.2% |
| 2013 | 118.04 million | +0.1% |
| 2014 | 115.16 million | -2.4% |
| 2015 | 117.03 million | +1.6% |
| 2016 | 120.36 million | +2.8% |
| 2017 | 116.74 million | -3.0% |
| 2018 | 113.95 million | -2.4% |
| 2019 | 119.14 million | +4.5% |
| 2020 | 114.26 million | -4.1% |
| 2021 | 106.37 million | -6.9% |
| 2022 | 103.29 million | -2.9% |
| 2023 | 90.57 million | -12.3% |
| 2024 | 88.32 million | -2.5% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 88.32 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 2.4× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Chile's 88.32 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 6.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 9.81 million | 7.36 million | 12.27 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 12.54 million | 11.74 million | 14.17 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 16.10 million | 13.73 million | 18.13 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 18.96 million | 17.01 million | 20.73 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 24.32 million | 21.74 million | 27.59 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 31.13 million | 26.62 million | 37.34 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 38.28 million | 34.92 million | 42.80 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 37.76 million | 34.86 million | 40.94 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 45.28 million | 42.74 million | 49.12 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 44.96 million | 42.19 million | 46.72 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 50.62 million | 45.55 million | 57.21 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 52.32 million | 49.01 million | 61.76 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 61.60 million | 44.46 million | 76.00 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 32.86 million | 26.04 million | 43.02 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 49.15 million | 29.00 million | 74.72 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 89.56 million | 74.36 million | 107.75 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 116.16 million | 110.12 million | 120.36 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 100.56 million | 88.32 million | 114.26 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Chile
More climate change data for Chile
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 306.17 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 15,030 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,258 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10,772 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 16.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 384.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,205 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,015 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 189.84 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.61 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Chile?
- Annual co2 including land use in Chile was 88.32 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 120.36 million in 2016.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.36 million in 1850.
- How does Chile rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Chile ranks 49th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is down 23.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).