Annual co2 including land use in Cuba
Cuba: Annual co2 including land use was 24.34 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Annual co2 including land use in Cuba, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co2 including land use in Cuba is 24.34 million, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of up 7.5% on the previous year and up 37.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Cuba peaked at 213.59 million in 1963 and was at its lowest, 3.08 million, in 1863.
Cuba ranks 107th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Cuba, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 3.47 million | — |
| 1857 | 3.37 million | -2.8% |
| 1858 | 3.29 million | -2.4% |
| 1859 | 3.21 million | -2.5% |
| 1860 | 3.12 million | -2.6% |
| 1861 | 3.22 million | +3.1% |
| 1862 | 3.33 million | +3.5% |
| 1863 | 3.08 million | -7.5% |
| 1864 | 3.30 million | +7.0% |
| 1865 | 3.25 million | -1.4% |
| 1866 | 3.25 million | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 3.26 million | +0.1% |
| 1868 | 3.21 million | -1.5% |
| 1869 | 3.29 million | +2.5% |
| 1870 | 3.45 million | +5.0% |
| 1871 | 3.52 million | +1.9% |
| 1872 | 3.57 million | +1.4% |
| 1873 | 3.62 million | +1.5% |
| 1874 | 3.65 million | +0.8% |
| 1875 | 3.67 million | +0.5% |
| 1876 | 3.59 million | -2.1% |
| 1877 | 3.63 million | +1.0% |
| 1878 | 3.73 million | +3.0% |
| 1879 | 3.75 million | +0.4% |
| 1880 | 3.74 million | -0.4% |
| 1881 | 3.80 million | +1.6% |
| 1882 | 3.82 million | +0.7% |
| 1883 | 3.82 million | -0.0% |
| 1884 | 3.83 million | +0.2% |
| 1885 | 3.87 million | +0.9% |
| 1886 | 3.84 million | -0.6% |
| 1887 | 3.92 million | +2.0% |
| 1888 | 4.01 million | +2.1% |
| 1889 | 4.09 million | +2.2% |
| 1890 | 4.15 million | +1.3% |
| 1891 | 4.33 million | +4.5% |
| 1892 | 4.45 million | +2.7% |
| 1893 | 4.41 million | -1.0% |
| 1894 | 4.50 million | +2.2% |
| 1895 | 4.47 million | -0.7% |
| 1896 | 4.29 million | -4.1% |
| 1897 | 4.25 million | -0.9% |
| 1898 | 4.34 million | +2.1% |
| 1899 | 4.47 million | +2.9% |
| 1900 | 9.58 million | +114.6% |
| 1901 | 11.65 million | +21.6% |
| 1902 | 12.73 million | +9.3% |
| 1903 | 13.68 million | +7.5% |
| 1904 | 14.35 million | +4.9% |
| 1905 | 15.05 million | +4.8% |
| 1906 | 15.62 million | +3.8% |
| 1907 | 15.95 million | +2.1% |
| 1908 | 16.14 million | +1.2% |
| 1909 | 16.46 million | +2.0% |
| 1910 | 20.76 million | +26.1% |
| 1911 | 22.81 million | +9.8% |
| 1912 | 24.21 million | +6.2% |
| 1913 | 24.87 million | +2.7% |
| 1914 | 25.10 million | +0.9% |
| 1915 | 25.63 million | +2.1% |
| 1916 | 26.47 million | +3.3% |
| 1917 | 27.11 million | +2.4% |
| 1918 | 27.27 million | +0.6% |
| 1919 | 26.29 million | -3.6% |
| 1920 | 28.54 million | +8.6% |
| 1921 | 27.02 million | -5.3% |
| 1922 | 27.25 million | +0.9% |
| 1923 | 27.94 million | +2.5% |
| 1924 | 27.90 million | -0.1% |
| 1925 | 28.19 million | +1.0% |
| 1926 | 28.26 million | +0.2% |
| 1927 | 28.39 million | +0.5% |
| 1928 | 28.43 million | +0.1% |
| 1929 | 27.77 million | -2.3% |
| 1930 | 21.83 million | -21.4% |
| 1931 | 19.04 million | -12.8% |
| 1932 | 17.54 million | -7.9% |
| 1933 | 16.69 million | -4.8% |
| 1934 | 16.16 million | -3.2% |
| 1935 | 15.69 million | -2.9% |
| 1936 | 15.48 million | -1.3% |
| 1937 | 15.27 million | -1.4% |
| 1938 | 14.94 million | -2.2% |
| 1939 | 14.56 million | -2.5% |
| 1940 | 29.57 million | +103.0% |
| 1941 | 35.19 million | +19.0% |
| 1942 | 38.19 million | +8.5% |
| 1943 | 40.42 million | +5.8% |
| 1944 | 41.56 million | +2.8% |
| 1945 | 42.58 million | +2.5% |
| 1946 | 43.27 million | +1.6% |
| 1947 | 43.96 million | +1.6% |
| 1948 | 44.32 million | +0.8% |
| 1949 | 44.66 million | +0.8% |
| 1950 | 75.09 million | +68.1% |
| 1951 | 73.29 million | -2.4% |
| 1952 | 145.06 million | +97.9% |
| 1953 | 73.22 million | -49.5% |
| 1954 | 60.10 million | -17.9% |
| 1955 | 42.76 million | -28.8% |
| 1956 | 32.42 million | -24.2% |
| 1957 | 34.43 million | +6.2% |
| 1958 | 39.66 million | +15.2% |
| 1959 | 32.06 million | -19.2% |
| 1960 | 25.13 million | -21.6% |
| 1961 | 76.82 million | +205.7% |
| 1962 | 99.04 million | +28.9% |
| 1963 | 213.59 million | +115.7% |
| 1964 | 96.67 million | -54.7% |
| 1965 | 57.98 million | -40.0% |
| 1966 | 81.29 million | +40.2% |
| 1967 | 95.09 million | +17.0% |
| 1968 | 76.35 million | -19.7% |
| 1969 | 128.07 million | +67.7% |
| 1970 | 85.71 million | -33.1% |
| 1971 | 183.61 million | +114.2% |
| 1972 | 162.42 million | -11.5% |
| 1973 | 88.40 million | -45.6% |
| 1974 | 106.61 million | +20.6% |
| 1975 | 118.04 million | +10.7% |
| 1976 | 82.49 million | -30.1% |
| 1977 | 62.59 million | -24.1% |
| 1978 | 52.47 million | -16.2% |
| 1979 | 60.78 million | +15.8% |
| 1980 | 51.59 million | -15.1% |
| 1981 | 75.46 million | +46.3% |
| 1982 | 77.12 million | +2.2% |
| 1983 | 57.95 million | -24.9% |
| 1984 | 67.94 million | +17.2% |
| 1985 | 98.80 million | +45.4% |
| 1986 | 121.64 million | +23.1% |
| 1987 | 91.67 million | -24.6% |
| 1988 | 69.20 million | -24.5% |
| 1989 | 60.52 million | -12.5% |
| 1990 | 52.48 million | -13.3% |
| 1991 | 63.92 million | +21.8% |
| 1992 | 43.04 million | -32.7% |
| 1993 | 36.40 million | -15.4% |
| 1994 | 38.18 million | +4.9% |
| 1995 | 28.53 million | -25.3% |
| 1996 | 54.11 million | +89.7% |
| 1997 | 37.63 million | -30.5% |
| 1998 | 40.64 million | +8.0% |
| 1999 | 29.81 million | -26.7% |
| 2000 | 60.15 million | +101.8% |
| 2001 | 39.05 million | -35.1% |
| 2002 | 30.31 million | -22.4% |
| 2003 | 26.86 million | -11.4% |
| 2004 | 37.57 million | +39.9% |
| 2005 | 29.59 million | -21.3% |
| 2006 | 24.86 million | -16.0% |
| 2007 | 21.10 million | -15.1% |
| 2008 | 20.88 million | -1.1% |
| 2009 | 19.82 million | -5.1% |
| 2010 | 23.68 million | +19.5% |
| 2011 | 9.96 million | -57.9% |
| 2012 | 19.92 million | +100.0% |
| 2013 | 17.00 million | -14.7% |
| 2014 | 17.70 million | +4.1% |
| 2015 | 17.75 million | +0.3% |
| 2016 | 34.20 million | +92.7% |
| 2017 | 23.03 million | -32.7% |
| 2018 | 31.09 million | +35.0% |
| 2019 | 21.99 million | -29.3% |
| 2020 | 18.12 million | -17.6% |
| 2021 | 18.29 million | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 21.41 million | +17.1% |
| 2023 | 22.65 million | +5.8% |
| 2024 | 24.34 million | +7.5% |
Cuba compared with similar countries
- Cuba's 24.34 million is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 100% of the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Cuba's 24.34 million is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 1.7× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Cuba changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1961 | +205.7% | 25.13 million | 76.82 million |
| 1963 | +115.7% | 99.04 million | 213.59 million |
| 1900 | +114.6% | 4.47 million | 9.58 million |
| 1971 | +114.2% | 85.71 million | 183.61 million |
| 1940 | +103.0% | 14.56 million | 29.57 million |
| 2000 | +101.8% | 29.81 million | 60.15 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 3.33 million | 3.21 million | 3.47 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 3.23 million | 3.08 million | 3.33 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 3.62 million | 3.45 million | 3.75 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 3.87 million | 3.74 million | 4.09 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 4.37 million | 4.15 million | 4.50 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 14.12 million | 9.58 million | 16.46 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 25.05 million | 20.76 million | 27.27 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 27.97 million | 27.02 million | 28.54 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 16.72 million | 14.56 million | 21.83 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 40.37 million | 29.57 million | 44.66 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 60.81 million | 32.06 million | 145.06 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 95.00 million | 25.13 million | 213.59 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 100.31 million | 52.47 million | 183.61 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 77.19 million | 51.59 million | 121.64 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 42.47 million | 28.53 million | 63.92 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 31.02 million | 19.82 million | 60.15 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 21.63 million | 9.96 million | 34.20 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 20.96 million | 18.12 million | 24.34 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
More climate change data for Cuba
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 70.05 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,131 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 3,149 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 8,982 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 11.88 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 320.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,054 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 500.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.89 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Cuba?
- Annual co2 including land use in Cuba was 24.34 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 213.59 million in 1963.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.08 million in 1863.
- How does Cuba rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Cuba ranks 107th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).