Annual co2 including land use in Czechia
Czechia: Annual co2 including land use was 69.94 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
69.94 million
Change on year
down 9.7%
World rank
56th
of 194 countries
All-time high
180.55 million
in 1984
All-time low
11.07 million
in 1860
Years of data
165
1860–2024
Annual co2 including land use in Czechia, 1860–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Czechia recorded 69.94 million for annual co2 including land use in 2024.
That represents a change of down 9.7% on the previous year and down 28.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Czechia peaked at 180.55 million in 1984 and was at its lowest, 11.07 million, in 1860.
That places Czechia 56th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Czechia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1860 | 11.07 million | — |
| 1861 | 11.56 million | +4.3% |
| 1862 | 12.11 million | +4.8% |
| 1863 | 12.63 million | +4.3% |
| 1864 | 13.09 million | +3.6% |
| 1865 | 13.62 million | +4.0% |
| 1866 | 14.07 million | +3.3% |
| 1867 | 14.74 million | +4.8% |
| 1868 | 15.07 million | +2.2% |
| 1869 | 15.54 million | +3.1% |
| 1870 | 15.46 million | -0.5% |
| 1871 | 15.83 million | +2.4% |
| 1872 | 16.20 million | +2.4% |
| 1873 | 16.60 million | +2.4% |
| 1874 | 16.99 million | +2.4% |
| 1875 | 17.37 million | +2.2% |
| 1876 | 22.51 million | +29.6% |
| 1877 | 23.07 million | +2.5% |
| 1878 | 23.59 million | +2.2% |
| 1879 | 24.56 million | +4.1% |
| 1880 | 24.31 million | -1.0% |
| 1881 | 24.66 million | +1.4% |
| 1882 | 24.73 million | +0.3% |
| 1883 | 25.63 million | +3.7% |
| 1884 | 25.96 million | +1.3% |
| 1885 | 26.70 million | +2.8% |
| 1886 | 27.50 million | +3.0% |
| 1887 | 28.57 million | +3.9% |
| 1888 | 29.76 million | +4.2% |
| 1889 | 30.98 million | +4.1% |
| 1890 | 33.74 million | +8.9% |
| 1891 | 35.13 million | +4.1% |
| 1892 | 35.81 million | +1.9% |
| 1893 | 36.61 million | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 37.50 million | +2.4% |
| 1895 | 38.73 million | +3.3% |
| 1896 | 39.49 million | +2.0% |
| 1897 | 41.35 million | +4.7% |
| 1898 | 42.12 million | +1.9% |
| 1899 | 43.06 million | +2.2% |
| 1900 | 43.34 million | +0.7% |
| 1901 | 44.95 million | +3.7% |
| 1902 | 45.56 million | +1.3% |
| 1903 | 46.35 million | +1.8% |
| 1904 | 46.80 million | +1.0% |
| 1905 | 47.99 million | +2.5% |
| 1906 | 49.72 million | +3.6% |
| 1907 | 51.70 million | +4.0% |
| 1908 | 52.52 million | +1.6% |
| 1909 | 52.28 million | -0.5% |
| 1910 | 48.88 million | -6.5% |
| 1911 | 48.09 million | -1.6% |
| 1912 | 49.54 million | +3.0% |
| 1913 | 50.62 million | +2.2% |
| 1914 | 45.57 million | -10.0% |
| 1915 | 44.55 million | -2.2% |
| 1916 | 46.53 million | +4.5% |
| 1917 | 43.09 million | -7.4% |
| 1918 | 36.30 million | -15.7% |
| 1919 | 33.51 million | -7.7% |
| 1920 | 33.84 million | +1.0% |
| 1921 | 32.86 million | -2.9% |
| 1922 | 29.59 million | -10.0% |
| 1923 | 31.56 million | +6.7% |
| 1924 | 38.72 million | +22.7% |
| 1925 | 36.72 million | -5.2% |
| 1926 | 37.38 million | +1.8% |
| 1927 | 40.26 million | +7.7% |
| 1928 | 42.61 million | +5.8% |
| 1929 | 47.58 million | +11.7% |
| 1930 | 39.87 million | -16.2% |
| 1931 | 35.19 million | -11.7% |
| 1932 | 28.70 million | -18.4% |
| 1933 | 24.24 million | -15.5% |
| 1934 | 22.74 million | -6.2% |
| 1935 | 22.02 million | -3.2% |
| 1936 | 23.29 million | +5.7% |
| 1937 | 29.05 million | +24.7% |
| 1938 | 33.74 million | +16.2% |
| 1939 | 37.06 million | +9.9% |
| 1940 | 42.97 million | +15.9% |
| 1941 | 42.75 million | -0.5% |
| 1942 | 46.84 million | +9.6% |
| 1943 | 52.90 million | +12.9% |
| 1944 | 49.13 million | -7.1% |
| 1945 | 17.68 million | -64.0% |
| 1946 | 25.80 million | +45.9% |
| 1947 | 31.26 million | +21.2% |
| 1948 | 34.83 million | +11.4% |
| 1949 | 37.14 million | +6.6% |
| 1950 | 54.59 million | +47.0% |
| 1951 | 49.73 million | -8.9% |
| 1952 | 53.18 million | +6.9% |
| 1953 | 55.77 million | +4.9% |
| 1954 | 60.53 million | +8.5% |
| 1955 | 63.41 million | +4.8% |
| 1956 | 69.00 million | +8.8% |
| 1957 | 72.74 million | +5.4% |
| 1958 | 80.58 million | +10.8% |
| 1959 | 95.23 million | +18.2% |
| 1960 | 100.82 million | +5.9% |
| 1961 | 100.83 million | +0.0% |
| 1962 | 106.15 million | +5.3% |
| 1963 | 111.40 million | +4.9% |
| 1964 | 115.88 million | +4.0% |
| 1965 | 112.46 million | -2.9% |
| 1966 | 111.77 million | -0.6% |
| 1967 | 111.53 million | -0.2% |
| 1968 | 117.15 million | +5.0% |
| 1969 | 125.30 million | +7.0% |
| 1970 | 145.36 million | +16.0% |
| 1971 | 152.98 million | +5.2% |
| 1972 | 154.51 million | +1.0% |
| 1973 | 155.22 million | +0.5% |
| 1974 | 157.09 million | +1.2% |
| 1975 | 165.12 million | +5.1% |
| 1976 | 172.29 million | +4.3% |
| 1977 | 177.81 million | +3.2% |
| 1978 | 179.50 million | +1.0% |
| 1979 | 174.48 million | -2.8% |
| 1980 | 177.36 million | +1.6% |
| 1981 | 175.43 million | -1.1% |
| 1982 | 173.91 million | -0.9% |
| 1983 | 174.47 million | +0.3% |
| 1984 | 180.55 million | +3.5% |
| 1985 | 178.28 million | -1.3% |
| 1986 | 179.68 million | +0.8% |
| 1987 | 177.60 million | -1.2% |
| 1988 | 174.77 million | -1.6% |
| 1989 | 167.31 million | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 158.37 million | -5.3% |
| 1991 | 142.96 million | -9.7% |
| 1992 | 139.66 million | -2.3% |
| 1993 | 134.44 million | -3.7% |
| 1994 | 128.18 million | -4.7% |
| 1995 | 126.55 million | -1.3% |
| 1996 | 130.64 million | +3.2% |
| 1997 | 127.20 million | -2.6% |
| 1998 | 122.97 million | -3.3% |
| 1999 | 113.45 million | -7.7% |
| 2000 | 124.13 million | +9.4% |
| 2001 | 111.78 million | -10.0% |
| 2002 | 110.65 million | -1.0% |
| 2003 | 113.71 million | +2.8% |
| 2004 | 114.80 million | +1.0% |
| 2005 | 111.93 million | -2.5% |
| 2006 | 115.80 million | +3.5% |
| 2007 | 117.18 million | +1.2% |
| 2008 | 111.88 million | -4.5% |
| 2009 | 104.01 million | -7.0% |
| 2010 | 107.30 million | +3.2% |
| 2011 | 107.11 million | -0.2% |
| 2012 | 102.72 million | -4.1% |
| 2013 | 99.16 million | -3.5% |
| 2014 | 98.12 million | -1.1% |
| 2015 | 100.30 million | +2.2% |
| 2016 | 103.18 million | +2.9% |
| 2017 | 102.62 million | -0.5% |
| 2018 | 100.65 million | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 95.31 million | -5.3% |
| 2020 | 86.04 million | -9.7% |
| 2021 | 90.94 million | +5.7% |
| 2022 | 89.26 million | -1.8% |
| 2023 | 77.50 million | -13.2% |
| 2024 | 69.94 million | -9.7% |
Czechia compared with similar countries
- Czechia's 69.94 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 1.9× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Czechia's 69.94 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 2.2× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Czechia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1945 | -64.0% | 49.13 million | 17.68 million |
| 1950 | +47.0% | 37.14 million | 54.59 million |
| 1946 | +45.9% | 17.68 million | 25.80 million |
| 1876 | +29.6% | 17.37 million | 22.51 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 13.35 million | 11.07 million | 15.54 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 19.22 million | 15.46 million | 24.56 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 26.88 million | 24.31 million | 30.98 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 38.35 million | 33.74 million | 43.06 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 48.12 million | 43.34 million | 52.52 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 44.67 million | 33.51 million | 50.62 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 37.11 million | 29.59 million | 47.58 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 29.59 million | 22.02 million | 39.87 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 38.13 million | 17.68 million | 52.90 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 65.48 million | 49.73 million | 95.23 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 111.33 million | 100.82 million | 125.30 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 163.44 million | 145.36 million | 179.50 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 175.94 million | 167.31 million | 180.55 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 132.44 million | 113.45 million | 158.37 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 113.59 million | 104.01 million | 124.13 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 101.65 million | 95.31 million | 107.30 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 82.73 million | 69.94 million | 90.94 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
More climate change data for Czechia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 222.01 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,062 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 892.87 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,169 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 113.19 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,743 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,712 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 31.31 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.46 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Czechia?
- Annual co2 including land use in Czechia was 69.94 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 180.55 million in 1984.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.07 million in 1860.
- How does Czechia rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Czechia ranks 56th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 28.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 165 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).