Annual co2 including land use in Latvia
Latvia: Annual co2 including land use was 9.41 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Annual co2 including land use in Latvia, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co2 including land use in Latvia is 9.41 million, measured in 2024.
The figure is up 1.3% on the previous year and up 23.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Latvia peaked at 28.02 million in 1985 and was at its lowest, -3.70 million, in 2000.
Latvia ranks 129th of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 11.04 million | — |
| 1855 | 11.05 million | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 11.12 million | +0.6% |
| 1859 | 11.29 million | +1.6% |
| 1860 | 10.67 million | -5.5% |
| 1861 | 10.53 million | -1.3% |
| 1862 | 10.46 million | -0.7% |
| 1863 | 10.50 million | +0.4% |
| 1864 | 10.42 million | -0.8% |
| 1865 | 10.40 million | -0.2% |
| 1866 | 10.26 million | -1.4% |
| 1867 | 10.40 million | +1.4% |
| 1868 | 10.28 million | -1.2% |
| 1869 | 10.32 million | +0.4% |
| 1870 | 10.48 million | +1.6% |
| 1871 | 10.33 million | -1.4% |
| 1872 | 10.31 million | -0.2% |
| 1873 | 10.30 million | -0.1% |
| 1874 | 10.37 million | +0.6% |
| 1875 | 10.34 million | -0.3% |
| 1876 | 10.36 million | +0.3% |
| 1877 | 10.39 million | +0.2% |
| 1878 | 10.52 million | +1.3% |
| 1879 | 10.55 million | +0.2% |
| 1880 | 10.55 million | -0.0% |
| 1881 | 10.48 million | -0.7% |
| 1882 | 10.60 million | +1.2% |
| 1883 | 10.75 million | +1.4% |
| 1884 | 10.78 million | +0.3% |
| 1885 | 10.73 million | -0.4% |
| 1886 | 10.74 million | +0.1% |
| 1887 | 10.84 million | +1.0% |
| 1888 | 10.82 million | -0.3% |
| 1889 | 10.85 million | +0.3% |
| 1890 | 11.05 million | +1.9% |
| 1891 | 11.02 million | -0.2% |
| 1892 | 10.91 million | -1.0% |
| 1893 | 10.88 million | -0.3% |
| 1894 | 10.85 million | -0.3% |
| 1895 | 11.03 million | +1.7% |
| 1896 | 11.03 million | +0.0% |
| 1897 | 11.12 million | +0.8% |
| 1898 | 11.32 million | +1.8% |
| 1899 | 11.37 million | +0.4% |
| 1900 | 11.38 million | +0.2% |
| 1901 | 11.62 million | +2.1% |
| 1902 | 11.42 million | -1.7% |
| 1903 | 11.60 million | +1.6% |
| 1904 | 11.61 million | +0.0% |
| 1905 | 11.61 million | -0.0% |
| 1906 | 11.67 million | +0.5% |
| 1907 | 11.77 million | +0.8% |
| 1908 | 11.81 million | +0.4% |
| 1909 | 11.92 million | +0.9% |
| 1910 | 10.25 million | -14.0% |
| 1911 | 9.77 million | -4.7% |
| 1912 | 9.53 million | -2.5% |
| 1913 | 9.35 million | -1.9% |
| 1914 | 9.06 million | -3.1% |
| 1915 | 8.86 million | -2.3% |
| 1916 | 8.57 million | -3.2% |
| 1917 | 8.37 million | -2.4% |
| 1918 | 7.84 million | -6.3% |
| 1919 | 7.57 million | -3.5% |
| 1920 | 7.48 million | -1.1% |
| 1921 | 7.35 million | -1.7% |
| 1922 | 7.28 million | -1.0% |
| 1923 | 7.13 million | -2.0% |
| 1924 | 7.14 million | +0.1% |
| 1925 | 7.09 million | -0.6% |
| 1926 | 7.06 million | -0.4% |
| 1927 | 6.99 million | -1.0% |
| 1928 | 6.97 million | -0.4% |
| 1929 | 7.12 million | +2.1% |
| 1930 | 6.67 million | -6.3% |
| 1931 | 6.73 million | +0.9% |
| 1932 | 6.75 million | +0.4% |
| 1933 | 6.72 million | -0.5% |
| 1934 | 6.92 million | +3.0% |
| 1935 | 6.97 million | +0.8% |
| 1936 | 7.31 million | +4.8% |
| 1937 | 7.07 million | -3.3% |
| 1938 | 7.26 million | +2.8% |
| 1939 | 7.11 million | -2.1% |
| 1940 | 7.06 million | -0.7% |
| 1941 | 6.38 million | -9.7% |
| 1942 | 4.73 million | -25.9% |
| 1943 | 4.44 million | -6.0% |
| 1944 | 4.84 million | +8.9% |
| 1945 | 4.66 million | -3.7% |
| 1946 | 4.64 million | -0.4% |
| 1947 | 4.92 million | +6.0% |
| 1948 | 4.75 million | -3.5% |
| 1949 | 5.12 million | +7.9% |
| 1950 | 5.56 million | +8.6% |
| 1951 | 6.55 million | +17.8% |
| 1952 | 7.74 million | +18.1% |
| 1953 | 8.54 million | +10.3% |
| 1954 | 9.55 million | +11.8% |
| 1955 | 10.92 million | +14.4% |
| 1956 | 12.07 million | +10.5% |
| 1957 | 13.23 million | +9.7% |
| 1958 | 14.04 million | +6.1% |
| 1959 | 14.75 million | +5.0% |
| 1960 | 13.41 million | -9.1% |
| 1961 | 13.88 million | +3.5% |
| 1962 | 13.32 million | -4.1% |
| 1963 | 13.83 million | +3.8% |
| 1964 | 14.75 million | +6.6% |
| 1965 | 14.84 million | +0.6% |
| 1966 | 15.52 million | +4.6% |
| 1967 | 16.03 million | +3.3% |
| 1968 | 17.08 million | +6.5% |
| 1969 | 17.03 million | -0.3% |
| 1970 | 17.67 million | +3.8% |
| 1971 | 19.03 million | +7.7% |
| 1972 | 19.91 million | +4.6% |
| 1973 | 21.09 million | +5.9% |
| 1974 | 20.98 million | -0.5% |
| 1975 | 22.49 million | +7.2% |
| 1976 | 23.33 million | +3.8% |
| 1977 | 23.59 million | +1.1% |
| 1978 | 24.04 million | +1.9% |
| 1979 | 24.58 million | +2.2% |
| 1980 | 25.50 million | +3.7% |
| 1981 | 25.48 million | -0.1% |
| 1982 | 25.72 million | +0.9% |
| 1983 | 25.76 million | +0.2% |
| 1984 | 26.13 million | +1.4% |
| 1985 | 28.02 million | +7.2% |
| 1986 | 25.51 million | -8.9% |
| 1987 | 20.96 million | -17.8% |
| 1988 | 20.38 million | -2.8% |
| 1989 | 19.46 million | -4.5% |
| 1990 | 21.19 million | +8.9% |
| 1991 | 19.82 million | -6.5% |
| 1992 | 15.77 million | -20.4% |
| 1993 | 23.81 million | +51.0% |
| 1994 | 1.19 million | -95.0% |
| 1995 | 3.16 million | +166.4% |
| 1996 | 614,633 | -80.5% |
| 1997 | -287,687 | -146.8% |
| 1998 | -2.64 million | +816.7% |
| 1999 | -1.68 million | -36.3% |
| 2000 | -3.70 million | +120.1% |
| 2001 | -1.80 million | -51.3% |
| 2002 | -2.19 million | +21.4% |
| 2003 | 3.51 million | -260.6% |
| 2004 | 10.52 million | +199.5% |
| 2005 | 14.96 million | +42.2% |
| 2006 | 7.51 million | -49.8% |
| 2007 | 6.13 million | -18.3% |
| 2008 | 6.06 million | -1.1% |
| 2009 | 4.82 million | -20.5% |
| 2010 | 6.73 million | +39.7% |
| 2011 | 7.54 million | +12.0% |
| 2012 | 9.13 million | +21.0% |
| 2013 | 7.23 million | -20.7% |
| 2014 | 7.62 million | +5.4% |
| 2015 | 11.29 million | +48.2% |
| 2016 | 8.49 million | -24.8% |
| 2017 | 8.22 million | -3.2% |
| 2018 | 10.46 million | +27.3% |
| 2019 | 9.56 million | -8.6% |
| 2020 | 8.90 million | -6.9% |
| 2021 | 8.50 million | -4.5% |
| 2022 | 8.87 million | +4.4% |
| 2023 | 9.29 million | +4.7% |
| 2024 | 9.41 million | +1.3% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 9.41 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 26% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 9.41 million is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 29% of the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | -816.7% | -287,687 | -2.64 million |
| 2003 | +260.6% | -2.19 million | 3.51 million |
| 2004 | +199.5% | 3.51 million | 10.52 million |
| 1995 | +166.4% | 1.19 million | 3.16 million |
| 1997 | -146.8% | 614,633 | -287,687 |
| 2000 | -120.1% | -1.68 million | -3.70 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 11.13 million | 11.04 million | 11.29 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 10.42 million | 10.26 million | 10.67 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 10.40 million | 10.30 million | 10.55 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 10.71 million | 10.48 million | 10.85 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 11.06 million | 10.85 million | 11.37 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 11.64 million | 11.38 million | 11.92 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 8.92 million | 7.57 million | 10.25 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.16 million | 6.97 million | 7.48 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 6.95 million | 6.67 million | 7.31 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 5.15 million | 4.44 million | 7.06 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 10.30 million | 5.56 million | 14.75 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 14.97 million | 13.32 million | 17.08 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 21.67 million | 17.67 million | 24.58 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 24.29 million | 19.46 million | 28.02 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 8.09 million | -2.64 million | 23.81 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.58 million | -3.70 million | 14.96 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.63 million | 6.73 million | 11.29 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.99 million | 8.50 million | 9.41 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More climate change data for Latvia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 43.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Latvia?
- Annual co2 including land use in Latvia was 9.41 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 28.02 million in 1985.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.70 million in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Latvia ranks 129th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).