Annual co2 including land use in Poland
Poland: Annual co2 including land use was 243.98 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Annual co2 including land use in Poland, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for annual co2 including land use in Poland is 243.98 million, measured in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.7% on the previous year and down 6.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Poland peaked at 453.46 million in 1987 and was at its lowest, -27.84 million, in 1919.
That places Poland 28th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Poland, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 40.94 million | — |
| 1851 | 42.52 million | +3.9% |
| 1852 | 43.81 million | +3.0% |
| 1853 | 44.08 million | +0.6% |
| 1854 | 44.92 million | +1.9% |
| 1855 | 45.55 million | +1.4% |
| 1856 | 45.80 million | +0.6% |
| 1857 | 45.94 million | +0.3% |
| 1858 | 46.47 million | +1.2% |
| 1859 | 45.75 million | -1.5% |
| 1860 | 45.44 million | -0.7% |
| 1861 | 44.89 million | -1.2% |
| 1862 | 45.45 million | +1.2% |
| 1863 | 46.35 million | +2.0% |
| 1864 | 46.93 million | +1.2% |
| 1865 | 47.69 million | +1.6% |
| 1866 | 46.96 million | -1.5% |
| 1867 | 47.99 million | +2.2% |
| 1868 | 48.83 million | +1.8% |
| 1869 | 49.05 million | +0.5% |
| 1870 | 52.57 million | +7.2% |
| 1871 | 55.28 million | +5.2% |
| 1872 | 57.36 million | +3.8% |
| 1873 | 58.88 million | +2.6% |
| 1874 | 61.25 million | +4.0% |
| 1875 | 60.67 million | -0.9% |
| 1876 | 60.57 million | -0.2% |
| 1877 | 58.74 million | -3.0% |
| 1878 | 59.38 million | +1.1% |
| 1879 | 61.65 million | +3.8% |
| 1880 | 61.06 million | -1.0% |
| 1881 | 60.22 million | -1.4% |
| 1882 | 61.06 million | +1.4% |
| 1883 | 63.36 million | +3.8% |
| 1884 | 64.05 million | +1.1% |
| 1885 | 65.14 million | +1.7% |
| 1886 | 65.54 million | +0.6% |
| 1887 | 65.89 million | +0.5% |
| 1888 | 68.70 million | +4.3% |
| 1889 | 71.44 million | +4.0% |
| 1890 | 70.50 million | -1.3% |
| 1891 | 73.20 million | +3.8% |
| 1892 | 70.56 million | -3.6% |
| 1893 | 72.14 million | +2.2% |
| 1894 | 72.60 million | +0.6% |
| 1895 | 75.15 million | +3.5% |
| 1896 | 77.80 million | +3.5% |
| 1897 | 79.80 million | +2.6% |
| 1898 | 83.92 million | +5.2% |
| 1899 | 86.09 million | +2.6% |
| 1900 | 87.66 million | +1.8% |
| 1901 | 90.95 million | +3.7% |
| 1902 | 89.06 million | -2.1% |
| 1903 | 92.10 million | +3.4% |
| 1904 | 92.75 million | +0.7% |
| 1905 | 98.34 million | +6.0% |
| 1906 | 101.97 million | +3.7% |
| 1907 | 109.78 million | +7.7% |
| 1908 | 115.60 million | +5.3% |
| 1909 | 117.85 million | +1.9% |
| 1910 | 109.53 million | -7.1% |
| 1911 | 108.39 million | -1.0% |
| 1912 | 113.47 million | +4.7% |
| 1913 | 113.52 million | +0.0% |
| 1914 | 89.28 million | -21.4% |
| 1915 | 81.79 million | -8.4% |
| 1916 | 91.30 million | +11.6% |
| 1917 | 98.78 million | +8.2% |
| 1918 | 75.53 million | -23.5% |
| 1919 | -27.84 million | -136.9% |
| 1920 | 59.14 million | -312.4% |
| 1921 | 67.55 million | +14.2% |
| 1922 | 73.43 million | +8.7% |
| 1923 | 62.94 million | -14.3% |
| 1924 | 66.07 million | +5.0% |
| 1925 | 74.11 million | +12.2% |
| 1926 | 81.14 million | +9.5% |
| 1927 | 100.49 million | +23.8% |
| 1928 | 109.33 million | +8.8% |
| 1929 | 124.46 million | +13.8% |
| 1930 | 92.64 million | -25.6% |
| 1931 | 82.88 million | -10.5% |
| 1932 | 64.76 million | -21.9% |
| 1933 | 60.80 million | -6.1% |
| 1934 | 58.73 million | -3.4% |
| 1935 | 54.86 million | -6.6% |
| 1936 | 54.73 million | -0.2% |
| 1937 | 57.48 million | +5.0% |
| 1938 | 57.76 million | +0.5% |
| 1939 | 46.50 million | -19.5% |
| 1940 | 156.22 million | +235.9% |
| 1941 | 148.50 million | -4.9% |
| 1942 | 160.78 million | +8.3% |
| 1943 | 172.72 million | +7.4% |
| 1944 | 159.26 million | -7.8% |
| 1945 | 25.21 million | -84.2% |
| 1946 | 66.45 million | +163.6% |
| 1947 | 49.76 million | -25.1% |
| 1948 | 43.70 million | -12.2% |
| 1949 | 56.90 million | +30.2% |
| 1950 | 76.82 million | +35.0% |
| 1951 | 96.70 million | +25.9% |
| 1952 | 111.29 million | +15.1% |
| 1953 | 130.04 million | +16.8% |
| 1954 | 144.38 million | +11.0% |
| 1955 | 156.09 million | +8.1% |
| 1956 | 171.62 million | +9.9% |
| 1957 | 186.06 million | +8.4% |
| 1958 | 183.53 million | -1.4% |
| 1959 | 196.04 million | +6.8% |
| 1960 | 202.97 million | +3.5% |
| 1961 | 206.76 million | +1.9% |
| 1962 | 213.12 million | +3.1% |
| 1963 | 226.50 million | +6.3% |
| 1964 | 233.03 million | +2.9% |
| 1965 | 238.18 million | +2.2% |
| 1966 | 240.38 million | +0.9% |
| 1967 | 246.99 million | +2.7% |
| 1968 | 260.18 million | +5.3% |
| 1969 | 278.36 million | +7.0% |
| 1970 | 288.84 million | +3.8% |
| 1971 | 295.96 million | +2.5% |
| 1972 | 312.59 million | +5.6% |
| 1973 | 318.58 million | +1.9% |
| 1974 | 330.46 million | +3.7% |
| 1975 | 359.75 million | +8.9% |
| 1976 | 383.39 million | +6.6% |
| 1977 | 403.40 million | +5.2% |
| 1978 | 415.91 million | +3.1% |
| 1979 | 426.81 million | +2.6% |
| 1980 | 447.43 million | +4.8% |
| 1981 | 393.92 million | -12.0% |
| 1982 | 406.85 million | +3.3% |
| 1983 | 414.34 million | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 422.43 million | +2.0% |
| 1985 | 433.94 million | +2.7% |
| 1986 | 442.13 million | +1.9% |
| 1987 | 453.46 million | +2.6% |
| 1988 | 434.47 million | -4.2% |
| 1989 | 412.99 million | -4.9% |
| 1990 | 367.09 million | -11.1% |
| 1991 | 364.44 million | -0.7% |
| 1992 | 355.99 million | -2.3% |
| 1993 | 357.30 million | +0.4% |
| 1994 | 355.48 million | -0.5% |
| 1995 | 350.74 million | -1.3% |
| 1996 | 367.30 million | +4.7% |
| 1997 | 359.18 million | -2.2% |
| 1998 | 335.34 million | -6.6% |
| 1999 | 322.86 million | -3.7% |
| 2000 | 298.77 million | -7.5% |
| 2001 | 280.15 million | -6.2% |
| 2002 | 262.61 million | -6.3% |
| 2003 | 290.63 million | +10.7% |
| 2004 | 280.24 million | -3.6% |
| 2005 | 287.88 million | +2.7% |
| 2006 | 287.99 million | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 303.30 million | +5.3% |
| 2008 | 293.75 million | -3.1% |
| 2009 | 252.65 million | -14.0% |
| 2010 | 301.86 million | +19.5% |
| 2011 | 283.06 million | -6.2% |
| 2012 | 272.51 million | -3.7% |
| 2013 | 273.56 million | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 260.48 million | -4.8% |
| 2015 | 265.03 million | +1.7% |
| 2016 | 278.88 million | +5.2% |
| 2017 | 293.14 million | +5.1% |
| 2018 | 312.31 million | +6.5% |
| 2019 | 305.62 million | -2.1% |
| 2020 | 273.38 million | -10.6% |
| 2021 | 299.05 million | +9.4% |
| 2022 | 283.97 million | -5.0% |
| 2023 | 253.28 million | -10.8% |
| 2024 | 243.98 million | -3.7% |
Poland compared with similar countries
- Poland's 243.98 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 6.6× the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Poland's 243.98 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.46 million, 7.5× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Poland changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1920 | +312.4% | -27.84 million | 59.14 million |
| 1940 | +235.9% | 46.50 million | 156.22 million |
| 1946 | +163.6% | 25.21 million | 66.45 million |
| 1919 | -136.9% | 75.53 million | -27.84 million |
| 1945 | -84.2% | 159.26 million | 25.21 million |
| 1950 | +35.0% | 56.90 million | 76.82 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 44.58 million | 40.94 million | 46.47 million | 10 |
| 1860s | 46.96 million | 44.89 million | 49.05 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 58.64 million | 52.57 million | 61.65 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 64.65 million | 60.22 million | 71.44 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 76.18 million | 70.50 million | 86.09 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 99.60 million | 87.66 million | 117.85 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 85.38 million | -27.84 million | 113.52 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 81.87 million | 59.14 million | 124.46 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 63.11 million | 46.50 million | 92.64 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 103.95 million | 25.21 million | 172.72 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 145.26 million | 76.82 million | 196.04 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 234.65 million | 202.97 million | 278.36 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 353.57 million | 288.84 million | 426.81 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 426.20 million | 393.92 million | 453.46 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 353.57 million | 322.86 million | 367.30 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 283.80 million | 252.65 million | 303.30 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 284.65 million | 260.48 million | 312.31 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 270.73 million | 243.98 million | 299.05 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More climate change data for Poland
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.05 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,935 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,534 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 15,401 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.11 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 550.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 7,175 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 7,089 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 86.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 26.75 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Poland?
- Annual co2 including land use in Poland was 243.98 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 453.46 million in 1987.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was -27.84 million in 1919.
- How does Poland rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Poland ranks 28th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).