Annual co2 including land use in Uruguay
Uruguay: Annual co2 including land use was 8.51 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Annual co2 including land use in Uruguay, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, annual co2 including land use in Uruguay stood at 8.51 million.
The figure is up 1.6% on the previous year and down 54.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Uruguay peaked at 39.64 million in 2008 and was at its lowest, -3.03 million, in 1969.
Uruguay ranks 133rd of 194 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 2.49 million | — |
| 1857 | 2.61 million | +5.0% |
| 1858 | 2.77 million | +6.0% |
| 1859 | 2.81 million | +1.3% |
| 1860 | 2.89 million | +3.0% |
| 1861 | 2.98 million | +3.1% |
| 1862 | 3.01 million | +1.1% |
| 1863 | 3.10 million | +2.9% |
| 1864 | 3.13 million | +0.8% |
| 1865 | 3.22 million | +3.1% |
| 1866 | 3.40 million | +5.4% |
| 1867 | 3.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1868 | 3.62 million | +5.1% |
| 1869 | 3.61 million | -0.3% |
| 1870 | 3.50 million | -2.9% |
| 1871 | 3.53 million | +0.6% |
| 1872 | 3.69 million | +4.8% |
| 1873 | 3.69 million | -0.2% |
| 1874 | 3.94 million | +6.8% |
| 1875 | 3.82 million | -3.0% |
| 1876 | 3.86 million | +1.2% |
| 1877 | 3.95 million | +2.2% |
| 1878 | 3.95 million | +0.1% |
| 1879 | 3.95 million | -0.2% |
| 1880 | 3.91 million | -0.9% |
| 1881 | 4.52 million | +15.7% |
| 1882 | 4.91 million | +8.7% |
| 1883 | 5.37 million | +9.2% |
| 1884 | 5.75 million | +7.1% |
| 1885 | 6.08 million | +5.7% |
| 1886 | 6.06 million | -0.3% |
| 1887 | 6.41 million | +5.9% |
| 1888 | 6.64 million | +3.6% |
| 1889 | 7.24 million | +9.0% |
| 1890 | 7.00 million | -3.4% |
| 1891 | 7.04 million | +0.6% |
| 1892 | 7.07 million | +0.4% |
| 1893 | 7.27 million | +2.8% |
| 1894 | 7.52 million | +3.6% |
| 1895 | 7.59 million | +0.8% |
| 1896 | 7.68 million | +1.3% |
| 1897 | 7.57 million | -1.4% |
| 1898 | 7.94 million | +4.9% |
| 1899 | 8.00 million | +0.7% |
| 1900 | 8.46 million | +5.8% |
| 1901 | 7.96 million | -5.9% |
| 1902 | 8.01 million | +0.7% |
| 1903 | 7.45 million | -6.9% |
| 1904 | 6.74 million | -9.6% |
| 1905 | 6.42 million | -4.7% |
| 1906 | 7.02 million | +9.3% |
| 1907 | 7.39 million | +5.4% |
| 1908 | 7.63 million | +3.1% |
| 1909 | 7.47 million | -2.0% |
| 1910 | 7.79 million | +4.3% |
| 1911 | 7.92 million | +1.6% |
| 1912 | 7.92 million | +0.1% |
| 1913 | 7.82 million | -1.3% |
| 1914 | 7.43 million | -5.0% |
| 1915 | 7.08 million | -4.7% |
| 1916 | 6.71 million | -5.3% |
| 1917 | 6.71 million | +0.0% |
| 1918 | 6.98 million | +4.0% |
| 1919 | 7.03 million | +0.8% |
| 1920 | 7.06 million | +0.3% |
| 1921 | 6.88 million | -2.5% |
| 1922 | 7.35 million | +6.9% |
| 1923 | 7.17 million | -2.4% |
| 1924 | 7.31 million | +1.9% |
| 1925 | 6.97 million | -4.7% |
| 1926 | 6.90 million | -1.0% |
| 1927 | 6.84 million | -0.9% |
| 1928 | 6.71 million | -1.9% |
| 1929 | 6.96 million | +3.7% |
| 1930 | 6.80 million | -2.2% |
| 1931 | 6.88 million | +1.0% |
| 1932 | 6.70 million | -2.5% |
| 1933 | 6.73 million | +0.4% |
| 1934 | 6.65 million | -1.1% |
| 1935 | 6.73 million | +1.1% |
| 1936 | 6.78 million | +0.7% |
| 1937 | 6.67 million | -1.6% |
| 1938 | 6.59 million | -1.1% |
| 1939 | 6.70 million | +1.6% |
| 1940 | 6.80 million | +1.6% |
| 1941 | 6.56 million | -3.5% |
| 1942 | 6.29 million | -4.2% |
| 1943 | 6.49 million | +3.3% |
| 1944 | 6.36 million | -2.1% |
| 1945 | 6.48 million | +2.0% |
| 1946 | 6.12 million | -5.5% |
| 1947 | 6.02 million | -1.7% |
| 1948 | 6.03 million | +0.2% |
| 1949 | 6.02 million | -0.2% |
| 1950 | 8.11 million | +34.7% |
| 1951 | 7.98 million | -1.6% |
| 1952 | 8.32 million | +4.3% |
| 1953 | 8.52 million | +2.4% |
| 1954 | 8.76 million | +2.8% |
| 1955 | 9.18 million | +4.9% |
| 1956 | 9.22 million | +0.4% |
| 1957 | 9.65 million | +4.6% |
| 1958 | 9.18 million | -4.9% |
| 1959 | 9.33 million | +1.7% |
| 1960 | 9.47 million | +1.4% |
| 1961 | 6.84 million | -27.7% |
| 1962 | 4.54 million | -33.6% |
| 1963 | 3.12 million | -31.3% |
| 1964 | 2.20 million | -29.4% |
| 1965 | 2.14 million | -2.7% |
| 1966 | 681,837 | -68.2% |
| 1967 | -564,081 | -182.7% |
| 1968 | -1.53 million | +172.0% |
| 1969 | -3.03 million | +97.6% |
| 1970 | -1.73 million | -43.0% |
| 1971 | -1.28 million | -25.6% |
| 1972 | -795,751 | -38.1% |
| 1973 | -988,064 | +24.2% |
| 1974 | -989,280 | +0.1% |
| 1975 | -700,027 | -29.2% |
| 1976 | -766,830 | +9.5% |
| 1977 | -1.00 million | +31.0% |
| 1978 | -988,470 | -1.6% |
| 1979 | -441,488 | -55.3% |
| 1980 | -418,416 | -5.2% |
| 1981 | -537,198 | +28.4% |
| 1982 | -763,942 | +42.2% |
| 1983 | -1.58 million | +106.7% |
| 1984 | -1.76 million | +11.2% |
| 1985 | -1.77 million | +0.7% |
| 1986 | -1.65 million | -6.8% |
| 1987 | -1.15 million | -30.3% |
| 1988 | 153,236 | -113.3% |
| 1989 | -1.62 million | -1154.2% |
| 1990 | 309,198 | -119.1% |
| 1991 | 1.77 million | +471.8% |
| 1992 | 2.91 million | +64.6% |
| 1993 | 2.65 million | -8.8% |
| 1994 | 2.59 million | -2.3% |
| 1995 | 3.41 million | +31.4% |
| 1996 | 4.57 million | +34.2% |
| 1997 | 4.93 million | +7.7% |
| 1998 | 5.16 million | +4.7% |
| 1999 | 6.44 million | +24.9% |
| 2000 | 4.66 million | -27.7% |
| 2001 | 4.78 million | +2.6% |
| 2002 | 4.15 million | -13.1% |
| 2003 | 4.35 million | +4.9% |
| 2004 | 5.21 million | +19.6% |
| 2005 | 6.65 million | +27.6% |
| 2006 | 13.35 million | +100.8% |
| 2007 | 28.69 million | +115.0% |
| 2008 | 39.64 million | +38.2% |
| 2009 | 23.89 million | -39.7% |
| 2010 | 33.68 million | +41.0% |
| 2011 | 20.22 million | -40.0% |
| 2012 | 24.89 million | +23.1% |
| 2013 | 24.43 million | -1.9% |
| 2014 | 18.72 million | -23.3% |
| 2015 | 10.94 million | -41.6% |
| 2016 | 9.12 million | -16.6% |
| 2017 | 8.63 million | -5.4% |
| 2018 | 8.89 million | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 8.36 million | -6.0% |
| 2020 | 7.97 million | -4.6% |
| 2021 | 9.06 million | +13.7% |
| 2022 | 8.47 million | -6.6% |
| 2023 | 8.37 million | -1.1% |
| 2024 | 8.51 million | +1.6% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's 8.51 million is below the median for high income countries, which is 36.71 million, 23% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's 8.51 million is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 58% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1989 | -1154.2% | 153,236 | -1.62 million |
| 1991 | +471.8% | 309,198 | 1.77 million |
| 1967 | -182.7% | 681,837 | -564,081 |
| 1968 | -172.0% | -564,081 | -1.53 million |
| 1990 | +119.1% | -1.62 million | 309,198 |
| 2007 | +115.0% | 13.35 million | 28.69 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 2.67 million | 2.49 million | 2.81 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 3.24 million | 2.89 million | 3.62 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 3.79 million | 3.50 million | 3.95 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 5.69 million | 3.91 million | 7.24 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 7.47 million | 7.00 million | 8.00 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 7.46 million | 6.42 million | 8.46 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 7.34 million | 6.71 million | 7.92 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.01 million | 6.71 million | 7.35 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 6.72 million | 6.59 million | 6.88 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 6.32 million | 6.02 million | 6.80 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 8.83 million | 7.98 million | 9.65 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.39 million | -3.03 million | 9.47 million | 10 |
| 1970s | -968,723 | -1.73 million | -441,488 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.11 million | -1.77 million | 153,236 | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.47 million | 309,198 | 6.44 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 13.54 million | 4.15 million | 39.64 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 16.79 million | 8.36 million | 33.68 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 8.48 million | 7.97 million | 9.06 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More climate change data for Uruguay
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 282.29 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 30,988 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6,806 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 24,182 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.68 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 863.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,857 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,098 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,759 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.92 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Uruguay?
- Annual co2 including land use in Uruguay was 8.51 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 39.64 million in 2008.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.03 million in 1969.
- How does Uruguay rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Uruguay ranks 133rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 54.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).