Annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Annual co2 including land use was 11.95 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe, 1903–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe stood at 11.95 million.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and up 23.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe peaked at 79.21 million in 1999 and was at its lowest, 3.00 million, in 1903.
That places Zimbabwe 120th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1903 | 3.00 million | — |
| 1904 | 3.15 million | +5.3% |
| 1905 | 3.31 million | +5.0% |
| 1906 | 3.39 million | +2.4% |
| 1907 | 3.46 million | +1.9% |
| 1908 | 3.64 million | +5.2% |
| 1909 | 3.68 million | +1.3% |
| 1910 | 4.04 million | +9.7% |
| 1911 | 4.27 million | +5.6% |
| 1912 | 4.43 million | +3.7% |
| 1913 | 4.54 million | +2.6% |
| 1914 | 4.88 million | +7.4% |
| 1915 | 5.06 million | +3.7% |
| 1916 | 5.28 million | +4.4% |
| 1917 | 5.56 million | +5.3% |
| 1918 | 5.37 million | -3.5% |
| 1919 | 5.44 million | +1.4% |
| 1920 | 6.65 million | +22.2% |
| 1921 | 7.32 million | +10.1% |
| 1922 | 7.61 million | +4.0% |
| 1923 | 8.12 million | +6.7% |
| 1924 | 8.44 million | +4.0% |
| 1925 | 8.84 million | +4.8% |
| 1926 | 9.47 million | +7.1% |
| 1927 | 9.63 million | +1.7% |
| 1928 | 10.21 million | +6.1% |
| 1929 | 10.10 million | -1.1% |
| 1930 | 10.51 million | +4.1% |
| 1931 | 9.98 million | -5.1% |
| 1932 | 9.87 million | -1.1% |
| 1933 | 10.06 million | +1.9% |
| 1934 | 10.47 million | +4.1% |
| 1935 | 10.81 million | +3.3% |
| 1936 | 10.88 million | +0.6% |
| 1937 | 11.89 million | +9.3% |
| 1938 | 11.99 million | +0.8% |
| 1939 | 12.08 million | +0.8% |
| 1940 | 14.80 million | +22.5% |
| 1941 | 16.69 million | +12.8% |
| 1942 | 17.92 million | +7.4% |
| 1943 | 18.96 million | +5.8% |
| 1944 | 19.59 million | +3.3% |
| 1945 | 19.54 million | -0.3% |
| 1946 | 19.55 million | +0.1% |
| 1947 | 19.49 million | -0.3% |
| 1948 | 20.11 million | +3.2% |
| 1949 | 20.94 million | +4.2% |
| 1950 | 18.79 million | -10.3% |
| 1951 | 20.02 million | +6.5% |
| 1952 | 20.46 million | +2.2% |
| 1953 | 21.06 million | +2.9% |
| 1954 | 22.26 million | +5.7% |
| 1955 | 22.99 million | +3.3% |
| 1956 | 23.91 million | +4.0% |
| 1957 | 24.74 million | +3.5% |
| 1958 | 24.69 million | -0.2% |
| 1959 | 25.46 million | +3.1% |
| 1960 | 26.22 million | +3.0% |
| 1961 | 23.33 million | -11.0% |
| 1962 | 24.20 million | +3.7% |
| 1963 | 22.00 million | -9.1% |
| 1964 | 21.00 million | -4.6% |
| 1965 | 16.41 million | -21.8% |
| 1966 | 20.96 million | +27.7% |
| 1967 | 18.55 million | -11.5% |
| 1968 | 24.29 million | +30.9% |
| 1969 | 25.57 million | +5.2% |
| 1970 | 29.19 million | +14.2% |
| 1971 | 32.91 million | +12.8% |
| 1972 | 30.06 million | -8.7% |
| 1973 | 33.01 million | +9.8% |
| 1974 | 30.76 million | -6.8% |
| 1975 | 28.00 million | -9.0% |
| 1976 | 32.95 million | +17.7% |
| 1977 | 27.50 million | -16.5% |
| 1978 | 26.28 million | -4.4% |
| 1979 | 28.68 million | +9.1% |
| 1980 | 34.98 million | +22.0% |
| 1981 | 34.90 million | -0.2% |
| 1982 | 42.48 million | +21.7% |
| 1983 | 38.35 million | -9.7% |
| 1984 | 33.88 million | -11.7% |
| 1985 | 38.04 million | +12.3% |
| 1986 | 28.25 million | -25.7% |
| 1987 | 35.26 million | +24.8% |
| 1988 | 55.61 million | +57.7% |
| 1989 | 57.81 million | +4.0% |
| 1990 | 55.18 million | -4.6% |
| 1991 | 39.30 million | -28.8% |
| 1992 | 49.97 million | +27.2% |
| 1993 | 67.48 million | +35.0% |
| 1994 | 61.34 million | -9.1% |
| 1995 | 67.02 million | +9.3% |
| 1996 | 51.37 million | -23.3% |
| 1997 | 49.00 million | -4.6% |
| 1998 | 65.69 million | +34.1% |
| 1999 | 79.21 million | +20.6% |
| 2000 | 57.61 million | -27.3% |
| 2001 | 54.95 million | -4.6% |
| 2002 | 51.11 million | -7.0% |
| 2003 | 58.34 million | +14.1% |
| 2004 | 53.77 million | -7.8% |
| 2005 | 59.66 million | +10.9% |
| 2006 | 45.49 million | -23.8% |
| 2007 | 57.20 million | +25.7% |
| 2008 | 36.58 million | -36.1% |
| 2009 | 30.98 million | -15.3% |
| 2010 | 43.09 million | +39.1% |
| 2011 | 31.27 million | -27.4% |
| 2012 | 20.26 million | -35.2% |
| 2013 | 11.01 million | -45.7% |
| 2014 | 9.67 million | -12.1% |
| 2015 | 17.87 million | +84.8% |
| 2016 | 10.81 million | -39.5% |
| 2017 | 15.40 million | +42.5% |
| 2018 | 10.13 million | -34.2% |
| 2019 | 16.60 million | +63.8% |
| 2020 | 7.90 million | -52.4% |
| 2021 | 12.44 million | +57.6% |
| 2022 | 11.89 million | -4.4% |
| 2023 | 12.13 million | +2.0% |
| 2024 | 11.95 million | -1.5% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 11.95 million is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 26.17 million, 46% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 11.95 million is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 14.74 million, 81% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | +84.8% | 9.67 million | 17.87 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 3.38 million | 3.00 million | 3.68 million | 7 |
| 1910s | 4.89 million | 4.04 million | 5.56 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 8.64 million | 6.65 million | 10.21 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 10.85 million | 9.87 million | 12.08 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 18.76 million | 14.80 million | 20.94 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 22.44 million | 18.79 million | 25.46 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 22.25 million | 16.41 million | 26.22 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 29.93 million | 26.28 million | 33.01 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 39.96 million | 28.25 million | 57.81 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 58.56 million | 39.30 million | 79.21 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 50.57 million | 30.98 million | 59.66 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.61 million | 9.67 million | 43.09 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 11.26 million | 7.90 million | 12.44 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More climate change data for Zimbabwe
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 178.46 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,716 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,805 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11,912 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 21.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 425.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,483 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 137.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.08 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe?
- Annual co2 including land use in Zimbabwe was 11.95 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest annual co2 including land use recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 79.21 million in 1999.
- What is the lowest annual co2 including land use recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.00 million in 1903.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for annual co2 including land use?
- Zimbabwe ranks 120th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is annual co2 including land use rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 23.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Annual co2 including land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).