Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Argentina
Argentina: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Argentina, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Argentina recorded 0 ha per US$ of GDP for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in 2024.
The figure is down 46.3% on the previous year and down 56.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Argentina peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2000 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2011.
Argentina ranks 17th of 183 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Argentina, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.5% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -17.1% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -3.4% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -8.0% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +117.3% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.3% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +22.3% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.3% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +111.2% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -61.0% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +69.0% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -86.8% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +24.0% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -49.5% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -61.4% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +6.5% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +262.4% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -80.1% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -53.0% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +24.5% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +26.0% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +69.5% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +17.1% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +239.4% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.1% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -51.7% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +14.1% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -64.2% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +78.8% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -25.9% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -46.3% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Argentina changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | +262.4% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2016 | +239.4% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Argentina
More climate change data for Argentina
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 1.78 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 145,843 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 31,455 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 114,387 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 118.7 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4,085 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,692 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 18,286 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,406 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 69 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Argentina?
- Closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Argentina was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Argentina?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2000.
- What is the lowest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Argentina?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2011.
- How does Argentina rank for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Argentina ranks 17th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Argentina?
- Over the last ten years it is down 56.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Argentina data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.