Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Turkmenistan
Turkmenistan: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Turkmenistan, 1992–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Turkmenistan stood at 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of up 269.1% on the previous year and down 89.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Turkmenistan peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places Turkmenistan 20th out of 183 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Turkmenistan, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +0.7% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +24.1% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.2% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +315.7% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -32.1% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +19.2% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +10.1% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -43.0% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -91.4% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -72.9% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +222.7% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +171.4% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -87.8% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -33.5% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -60.4% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +80.6% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -50.5% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +46.7% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +61.8% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +17.8% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +125.1% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -91.9% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +55.2% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +212.1% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -48.8% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +589.2% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +54.9% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -85.5% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -70.1% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -70.1% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +269.1% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Turkmenistan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | +589.2% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Turkmenistan
More climate change data for Turkmenistan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 401.02 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 10,722 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,821 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 7,901 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 10.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 282.16 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,665 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,374 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 291.28 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 8.96 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Turkmenistan?
- Closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Turkmenistan was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1996.
- What is the lowest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Turkmenistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Turkmenistan rank for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Turkmenistan ranks 20th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Turkmenistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 89.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Turkmenistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 33 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.