Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Canada
Canada: Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP in Canada, 1990–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in ha per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2024, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Canada stood at 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The figure is down 88.1% on the previous year and down 77.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Canada peaked at 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998 and was at its lowest, 0 ha per US$ of GDP, in 2008.
Canada ranks 24th of 183 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Canada, year by year
| Year | ha per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1990 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1991 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -2.7% |
| 1992 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2.6% |
| 1994 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -0.2% |
| 1995 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -4.3% |
| 1996 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +122.3% |
| 1997 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1998 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +460.9% |
| 1999 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -64.6% |
| 2000 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -67.8% |
| 2001 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -99.4% |
| 2002 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +2170.6% |
| 2003 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -45.0% |
| 2004 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +196.7% |
| 2005 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -61.9% |
| 2006 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -89.6% |
| 2007 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +602.4% |
| 2008 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -94.8% |
| 2009 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +945.6% |
| 2010 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +81.5% |
| 2011 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -53.1% |
| 2012 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +91.8% |
| 2013 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +184.7% |
| 2014 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +93.4% |
| 2015 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -78.3% |
| 2016 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -87.6% |
| 2017 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +354.6% |
| 2018 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -41.0% |
| 2019 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -72.6% |
| 2020 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +80.0% |
| 2021 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +24.2% |
| 2022 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +234.3% |
| 2023 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | +1184.6% |
| 2024 | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | -88.1% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP (unit GDP) in Canada changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 | +2170.6% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2023 | +1184.6% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
| 2009 | +945.6% | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 5 |
Countries ranked near Canada
More climate change data for Canada
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 2.27 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 44,359 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 9,631 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 34,728 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 36.34 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1,240 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,229 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 16,823 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 406.39 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 63.48 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Canada?
- Closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp in Canada was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Canada?
- The highest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 1998.
- What is the lowest closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp recorded in Canada?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 ha per US$ of GDP in 2008.
- How does Canada rank for closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 24th out of 183 countries with data for 2024.
- Is closed and open shrubland — burned area, per unit of gdp rising or falling in Canada?
- Over the last ten years it is down 77.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Canada data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Closed and open shrubland — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.