Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia
Serbia: Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled was 6.24 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia, 1885–2024
Source: Statizoid (derived).
Analysis
In 2024, co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia stood at 6.24.
That represents a change of down 1.5% on the previous year and up 20.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia peaked at 7.37 in 1988 and was at its lowest, 0.0068, in 1885.
That places Serbia 47th out of 213 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1885 | 0.0068 | — |
| 1890 | 0.0192 | +183.3% |
| 1891 | 0.0221 | +15.3% |
| 1892 | 0.0242 | +9.3% |
| 1893 | 0.0424 | +75.2% |
| 1894 | 0.0799 | +88.5% |
| 1895 | 0.0789 | -1.3% |
| 1896 | 0.0868 | +10.0% |
| 1897 | 0.0667 | -23.2% |
| 1898 | 0.0999 | +49.7% |
| 1899 | 0.115 | +15.2% |
| 1900 | 0.1537 | +33.6% |
| 1901 | 0.1655 | +7.7% |
| 1902 | 0.153 | -7.6% |
| 1903 | 0.1637 | +7.0% |
| 1904 | 0.1722 | +5.1% |
| 1905 | 0.1843 | +7.0% |
| 1906 | 0.2174 | +18.0% |
| 1907 | 0.2182 | +0.4% |
| 1908 | 0.2316 | +6.1% |
| 1909 | 0.2344 | +1.2% |
| 1910 | 0.2282 | -2.6% |
| 1911 | 0.243 | +6.5% |
| 1912 | 0.2445 | +0.6% |
| 1913 | 0.6587 | +169.4% |
| 1919 | 0.4193 | -36.3% |
| 1920 | 0.5451 | +30.0% |
| 1921 | 0.5684 | +4.3% |
| 1922 | 0.8089 | +42.3% |
| 1923 | 0.8641 | +6.8% |
| 1924 | 0.8676 | +0.4% |
| 1925 | 0.9327 | +7.5% |
| 1926 | 0.8894 | -4.6% |
| 1927 | 0.9843 | +10.7% |
| 1928 | 1.1 | +11.5% |
| 1929 | 1.17 | +6.6% |
| 1930 | 1.08 | -7.8% |
| 1931 | 0.9779 | -9.3% |
| 1932 | 0.8728 | -10.7% |
| 1933 | 0.791 | -9.4% |
| 1934 | 0.8063 | +1.9% |
| 1935 | 0.8267 | +2.5% |
| 1936 | 0.7982 | -3.5% |
| 1937 | 0.8707 | +9.1% |
| 1938 | 0.8079 | -7.2% |
| 1939 | 0.83 | +2.7% |
| 1940 | 0.9333 | +12.4% |
| 1941 | 0.6326 | -32.2% |
| 1942 | 0.3319 | -47.5% |
| 1943 | 0.0313 | -90.6% |
| 1944 | 0.0076 | -75.6% |
| 1945 | 0.4251 | +5470.1% |
| 1946 | 0.8234 | +93.7% |
| 1947 | 1.12 | +36.4% |
| 1948 | 1.24 | +10.4% |
| 1949 | 1.39 | +12.1% |
| 1950 | 1.31 | -5.6% |
| 1951 | 1.23 | -6.3% |
| 1952 | 1.22 | -0.5% |
| 1953 | 1.2 | -1.7% |
| 1954 | 1.42 | +17.9% |
| 1955 | 1.6 | +13.1% |
| 1956 | 1.81 | +13.0% |
| 1957 | 1.94 | +7.4% |
| 1958 | 1.89 | -2.5% |
| 1959 | 2.15 | +13.6% |
| 1960 | 2.33 | +8.1% |
| 1961 | 2.41 | +3.8% |
| 1962 | 2.45 | +1.6% |
| 1963 | 2.7 | +10.2% |
| 1964 | 3.03 | +12.2% |
| 1965 | 3.09 | +2.0% |
| 1966 | 3.04 | -1.8% |
| 1967 | 3.04 | +0.2% |
| 1968 | 3.23 | +6.1% |
| 1969 | 3.32 | +2.9% |
| 1970 | 4.31 | +29.7% |
| 1971 | 4.61 | +7.0% |
| 1972 | 4.29 | -6.9% |
| 1973 | 5.09 | +18.6% |
| 1974 | 5.08 | -0.2% |
| 1975 | 5.27 | +3.6% |
| 1976 | 5.4 | +2.5% |
| 1977 | 5.21 | -3.4% |
| 1978 | 5.79 | +11.0% |
| 1979 | 6.26 | +8.1% |
| 1980 | 6.12 | -2.2% |
| 1981 | 6.64 | +8.4% |
| 1982 | 6.08 | -8.4% |
| 1983 | 6.53 | +7.5% |
| 1984 | 6.88 | +5.3% |
| 1985 | 7.01 | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 7.32 | +4.4% |
| 1987 | 7.14 | -2.4% |
| 1988 | 7.37 | +3.2% |
| 1989 | 7.35 | -0.3% |
| 1990 | 7.31 | -0.5% |
| 1991 | 5.16 | -29.4% |
| 1992 | 5.55 | +7.6% |
| 1993 | 4.84 | -12.8% |
| 1994 | 4.72 | -2.6% |
| 1995 | 4.99 | +5.8% |
| 1996 | 5.85 | +17.3% |
| 1997 | 6.3 | +7.7% |
| 1998 | 6.66 | +5.6% |
| 1999 | 4.61 | -30.7% |
| 2000 | 5.15 | +11.7% |
| 2001 | 5.56 | +8.0% |
| 2002 | 5.97 | +7.4% |
| 2003 | 6.41 | +7.3% |
| 2004 | 7 | +9.2% |
| 2005 | 6.64 | -5.1% |
| 2006 | 7.15 | +7.7% |
| 2007 | 6.97 | -2.5% |
| 2008 | 6.94 | -0.4% |
| 2009 | 6.18 | -10.9% |
| 2010 | 6.18 | -0.1% |
| 2011 | 6.65 | +7.6% |
| 2012 | 5.97 | -10.1% |
| 2013 | 6.13 | +2.5% |
| 2014 | 5.17 | -15.7% |
| 2015 | 6.12 | +18.4% |
| 2016 | 6.34 | +3.7% |
| 2017 | 6.46 | +1.8% |
| 2018 | 6.34 | -1.9% |
| 2019 | 6.38 | +0.7% |
| 2020 | 6.57 | +2.9% |
| 2021 | 6.42 | -2.2% |
| 2022 | 6.55 | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 6.33 | -3.2% |
| 2024 | 6.24 | -1.5% |
Serbia compared with similar countries
- Serbia's 6.24 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 3.04, 2.1× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Serbia's 6.24 is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 5.13, 1.2× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1945 | +5470.1% | 0.0076 | 0.4251 |
| 1890 | +183.3% | 0.0068 | 0.0192 |
| 1913 | +169.4% | 0.2445 | 0.6587 |
| 1943 | -90.6% | 0.3319 | 0.0313 |
| 1946 | +93.7% | 0.4251 | 0.8234 |
| 1894 | +88.5% | 0.0424 | 0.0799 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0.0068 | 0.0068 | 0.0068 | 1 |
| 1890s | 0.0635 | 0.0192 | 0.115 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.1894 | 0.153 | 0.2344 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.3587 | 0.2282 | 0.6587 | 5 |
| 1920s | 0.8727 | 0.5451 | 1.17 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.8659 | 0.791 | 1.08 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.6936 | 0.0076 | 1.39 | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.58 | 1.2 | 2.15 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.87 | 2.33 | 3.32 | 10 |
| 1970s | 5.13 | 4.29 | 6.26 | 10 |
| 1980s | 6.84 | 6.08 | 7.37 | 10 |
| 1990s | 5.6 | 4.61 | 7.31 | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.4 | 5.15 | 7.15 | 10 |
| 2010s | 6.17 | 5.17 | 6.65 | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.42 | 6.24 | 6.57 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
More climate change data for Serbia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 405.98 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 5,818 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,261 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 4,557 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 4.76 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 162.74 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,874 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,767 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 107.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 10.44 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia?
- Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled in Serbia was 6.24 in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 7.37 in 1988.
- What is the lowest co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0068 in 1885.
- How does Serbia rank for co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled?
- Serbia ranks 47th out of 213 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 20.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 emissions vs gdp, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 131 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- CO₂ emissions per capita vs. GDP per capita Global Carbon Budget (2025); Population based on various sources (2024) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Co2 emissions vs gdp with 80 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.