Co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil
Brazil: Co2 fossil plus land use was 2.08 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil, 1856–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 2.08 billion for co2 fossil plus land use in 2024.
The figure is down 0.2% on the previous year and up 11.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil peaked at 3.34 billion in 2003 and was at its lowest, 35.22 million, in 1856.
That places Brazil 5th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1856 | 35.22 million | — |
| 1857 | 35.48 million | +0.7% |
| 1858 | 35.43 million | -0.1% |
| 1859 | 36.09 million | +1.9% |
| 1860 | 36.33 million | +0.7% |
| 1861 | 36.95 million | +1.7% |
| 1862 | 36.70 million | -0.7% |
| 1863 | 37.12 million | +1.1% |
| 1864 | 37.25 million | +0.4% |
| 1865 | 37.65 million | +1.1% |
| 1866 | 38.11 million | +1.2% |
| 1867 | 38.26 million | +0.4% |
| 1868 | 38.66 million | +1.1% |
| 1869 | 38.53 million | -0.3% |
| 1870 | 46.48 million | +20.6% |
| 1871 | 49.31 million | +6.1% |
| 1872 | 50.98 million | +3.4% |
| 1873 | 52.19 million | +2.4% |
| 1874 | 52.93 million | +1.4% |
| 1875 | 53.36 million | +0.8% |
| 1876 | 53.66 million | +0.6% |
| 1877 | 54.24 million | +1.1% |
| 1878 | 54.63 million | +0.7% |
| 1879 | 54.86 million | +0.4% |
| 1880 | 80.29 million | +46.3% |
| 1881 | 91.71 million | +14.2% |
| 1882 | 98.51 million | +7.4% |
| 1883 | 103.36 million | +4.9% |
| 1884 | 106.41 million | +3.0% |
| 1885 | 109.41 million | +2.8% |
| 1886 | 111.55 million | +2.0% |
| 1887 | 113.81 million | +2.0% |
| 1888 | 114.77 million | +0.8% |
| 1889 | 117.18 million | +2.1% |
| 1890 | 116.90 million | -0.2% |
| 1891 | 116.98 million | +0.1% |
| 1892 | 117.16 million | +0.2% |
| 1893 | 117.63 million | +0.4% |
| 1894 | 118.20 million | +0.5% |
| 1895 | 119.04 million | +0.7% |
| 1896 | 119.86 million | +0.7% |
| 1897 | 121.25 million | +1.2% |
| 1898 | 121.44 million | +0.2% |
| 1899 | 122.59 million | +1.0% |
| 1900 | 150.37 million | +22.7% |
| 1901 | 162.58 million | +8.1% |
| 1902 | 170.01 million | +4.6% |
| 1903 | 175.32 million | +3.1% |
| 1904 | 179.07 million | +2.1% |
| 1905 | 182.79 million | +2.1% |
| 1906 | 185.89 million | +1.7% |
| 1907 | 188.80 million | +1.6% |
| 1908 | 191.93 million | +1.7% |
| 1909 | 193.35 million | +0.7% |
| 1910 | 247.47 million | +28.0% |
| 1911 | 273.07 million | +10.3% |
| 1912 | 288.15 million | +5.5% |
| 1913 | 298.99 million | +3.8% |
| 1914 | 305.22 million | +2.1% |
| 1915 | 310.96 million | +1.9% |
| 1916 | 315.36 million | +1.4% |
| 1917 | 319.96 million | +1.5% |
| 1918 | 325.00 million | +1.6% |
| 1919 | 328.76 million | +1.2% |
| 1920 | 366.46 million | +11.5% |
| 1921 | 381.72 million | +4.2% |
| 1922 | 394.13 million | +3.3% |
| 1923 | 401.33 million | +1.8% |
| 1924 | 407.63 million | +1.6% |
| 1925 | 412.42 million | +1.2% |
| 1926 | 416.00 million | +0.9% |
| 1927 | 420.88 million | +1.2% |
| 1928 | 423.26 million | +0.6% |
| 1929 | 428.82 million | +1.3% |
| 1930 | 315.49 million | -26.4% |
| 1931 | 266.60 million | -15.5% |
| 1932 | 240.22 million | -9.9% |
| 1933 | 220.52 million | -8.2% |
| 1934 | 206.93 million | -6.2% |
| 1935 | 198.33 million | -4.2% |
| 1936 | 191.69 million | -3.3% |
| 1937 | 184.15 million | -3.9% |
| 1938 | 178.51 million | -3.1% |
| 1939 | 173.03 million | -3.1% |
| 1940 | 305.33 million | +76.5% |
| 1941 | 359.60 million | +17.8% |
| 1942 | 389.48 million | +8.3% |
| 1943 | 411.57 million | +5.7% |
| 1944 | 426.63 million | +3.7% |
| 1945 | 437.78 million | +2.6% |
| 1946 | 449.19 million | +2.6% |
| 1947 | 458.47 million | +2.1% |
| 1948 | 464.50 million | +1.3% |
| 1949 | 476.09 million | +2.5% |
| 1950 | 634.10 million | +33.2% |
| 1951 | 705.36 million | +11.2% |
| 1952 | 752.49 million | +6.7% |
| 1953 | 783.28 million | +4.1% |
| 1954 | 817.34 million | +4.3% |
| 1955 | 847.56 million | +3.7% |
| 1956 | 873.69 million | +3.1% |
| 1957 | 895.70 million | +2.5% |
| 1958 | 931.28 million | +4.0% |
| 1959 | 960.20 million | +3.1% |
| 1960 | 1.02 billion | +5.9% |
| 1961 | 1.06 billion | +4.2% |
| 1962 | 1.09 billion | +3.2% |
| 1963 | 1.12 billion | +2.7% |
| 1964 | 1.14 billion | +1.8% |
| 1965 | 1.16 billion | +1.3% |
| 1966 | 1.18 billion | +1.8% |
| 1967 | 1.20 billion | +1.5% |
| 1968 | 1.22 billion | +1.9% |
| 1969 | 1.24 billion | +1.3% |
| 1970 | 1.23 billion | -0.5% |
| 1971 | 1.24 billion | +1.1% |
| 1972 | 1.26 billion | +1.1% |
| 1973 | 1.29 billion | +2.3% |
| 1974 | 1.31 billion | +2.2% |
| 1975 | 1.34 billion | +2.4% |
| 1976 | 1.37 billion | +2.2% |
| 1977 | 1.41 billion | +2.4% |
| 1978 | 1.45 billion | +3.4% |
| 1979 | 1.50 billion | +2.9% |
| 1980 | 1.54 billion | +3.1% |
| 1981 | 1.56 billion | +1.2% |
| 1982 | 1.58 billion | +1.4% |
| 1983 | 1.59 billion | +0.6% |
| 1984 | 1.60 billion | +0.3% |
| 1985 | 1.86 billion | +16.7% |
| 1986 | 1.90 billion | +2.1% |
| 1987 | 1.83 billion | -3.9% |
| 1988 | 1.79 billion | -2.4% |
| 1989 | 1.71 billion | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 1.76 billion | +2.9% |
| 1991 | 1.78 billion | +1.4% |
| 1992 | 1.86 billion | +4.2% |
| 1993 | 1.81 billion | -2.4% |
| 1994 | 2.21 billion | +22.0% |
| 1995 | 2.16 billion | -2.5% |
| 1996 | 2.09 billion | -3.2% |
| 1997 | 2.21 billion | +5.8% |
| 1998 | 2.46 billion | +11.3% |
| 1999 | 2.50 billion | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 2.29 billion | -8.5% |
| 2001 | 2.20 billion | -4.0% |
| 2002 | 2.35 billion | +6.9% |
| 2003 | 3.34 billion | +42.3% |
| 2004 | 2.68 billion | -19.7% |
| 2005 | 2.40 billion | -10.7% |
| 2006 | 2.16 billion | -10.1% |
| 2007 | 2.03 billion | -6.0% |
| 2008 | 1.85 billion | -8.9% |
| 2009 | 1.62 billion | -12.2% |
| 2010 | 1.55 billion | -4.2% |
| 2011 | 1.52 billion | -2.1% |
| 2012 | 1.70 billion | +11.6% |
| 2013 | 1.81 billion | +6.6% |
| 2014 | 1.87 billion | +3.7% |
| 2015 | 1.87 billion | -0.1% |
| 2016 | 1.75 billion | -6.4% |
| 2017 | 1.62 billion | -7.6% |
| 2018 | 1.64 billion | +1.2% |
| 2019 | 1.71 billion | +4.6% |
| 2020 | 1.82 billion | +6.0% |
| 2021 | 2.05 billion | +12.7% |
| 2022 | 2.13 billion | +4.1% |
| 2023 | 2.09 billion | -2.2% |
| 2024 | 2.08 billion | -0.2% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 2.08 billion is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 24.44 million, 85.2× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 2.08 billion is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 14.67 million, 142.0× the median. (33 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1940 | +76.5% | 173.03 million | 305.33 million |
| 1880 | +46.3% | 54.86 million | 80.29 million |
| 2003 | +42.3% | 2.35 billion | 3.34 billion |
| 1950 | +33.2% | 476.09 million | 634.10 million |
| 1930 | -26.4% | 428.82 million | 315.49 million |
| 1910 | +28.0% | 193.35 million | 247.47 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 35.55 million | 35.22 million | 36.09 million | 4 |
| 1860s | 37.56 million | 36.33 million | 38.66 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 52.26 million | 46.48 million | 54.86 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 104.70 million | 80.29 million | 117.18 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 119.11 million | 116.90 million | 122.59 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 178.01 million | 150.37 million | 193.35 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 301.29 million | 247.47 million | 328.76 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 405.26 million | 366.46 million | 428.82 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 217.55 million | 173.03 million | 315.49 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 417.86 million | 305.33 million | 476.09 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 820.10 million | 634.10 million | 960.20 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.14 billion | 1.02 billion | 1.24 billion | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.34 billion | 1.23 billion | 1.50 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.70 billion | 1.54 billion | 1.90 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.08 billion | 1.76 billion | 2.50 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.29 billion | 1.62 billion | 3.34 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.70 billion | 1.52 billion | 1.87 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.03 billion | 1.82 billion | 2.13 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More climate change data for Brazil
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 8.54 billion kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 564,343 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 124,669 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 439,674 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 470.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 15,703 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 67,360 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 60,554 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6,806 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 228.5 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil?
- Co2 fossil plus land use in Brazil was 2.08 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 3.34 billion in 2003.
- What is the lowest co2 fossil plus land use recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 35.22 million in 1856.
- How does Brazil rank for co2 fossil plus land use?
- Brazil ranks 5th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 fossil plus land use rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is up 11.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 fossil plus land use. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 169 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).