Co2 income level in Norway
Norway: Co2 income level was 37.18 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
37.18 million
Change on year
down 4.3%
World rank
65th
of 215 countries
All-time high
45.66 million
in 2010
All-time low
0
in 1750
Years of data
275
1750–2024
Co2 income level in Norway, 1750–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 income level in Norway is 37.18 million, measured in 2024.
That represents a change of down 4.3% on the previous year and down 17.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Norway peaked at 45.66 million in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1750.
Norway ranks 65th of 215 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Norway, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1750 | 0 | — |
| 1751 | 0 | — |
| 1752 | 0 | — |
| 1753 | 0 | — |
| 1754 | 0 | — |
| 1755 | 0 | — |
| 1756 | 0 | — |
| 1757 | 0 | — |
| 1758 | 0 | — |
| 1759 | 0 | — |
| 1760 | 0 | — |
| 1761 | 0 | — |
| 1762 | 0 | — |
| 1763 | 0 | — |
| 1764 | 0 | — |
| 1765 | 0 | — |
| 1766 | 0 | — |
| 1767 | 0 | — |
| 1768 | 0 | — |
| 1769 | 0 | — |
| 1770 | 0 | — |
| 1771 | 0 | — |
| 1772 | 0 | — |
| 1773 | 0 | — |
| 1774 | 0 | — |
| 1775 | 0 | — |
| 1776 | 0 | — |
| 1777 | 0 | — |
| 1778 | 0 | — |
| 1779 | 0 | — |
| 1780 | 0 | — |
| 1781 | 0 | — |
| 1782 | 0 | — |
| 1783 | 0 | — |
| 1784 | 0 | — |
| 1785 | 0 | — |
| 1786 | 0 | — |
| 1787 | 0 | — |
| 1788 | 0 | — |
| 1789 | 0 | — |
| 1790 | 0 | — |
| 1791 | 0 | — |
| 1792 | 0 | — |
| 1793 | 0 | — |
| 1794 | 0 | — |
| 1795 | 0 | — |
| 1796 | 0 | — |
| 1797 | 0 | — |
| 1798 | 0 | — |
| 1799 | 0 | — |
| 1800 | 0 | — |
| 1801 | 0 | — |
| 1802 | 0 | — |
| 1803 | 0 | — |
| 1804 | 0 | — |
| 1805 | 0 | — |
| 1806 | 0 | — |
| 1807 | 0 | — |
| 1808 | 0 | — |
| 1809 | 0 | — |
| 1810 | 0 | — |
| 1811 | 0 | — |
| 1812 | 0 | — |
| 1813 | 0 | — |
| 1814 | 0 | — |
| 1815 | 0 | — |
| 1816 | 0 | — |
| 1817 | 0 | — |
| 1818 | 0 | — |
| 1819 | 0 | — |
| 1820 | 0 | — |
| 1821 | 0 | — |
| 1822 | 0 | — |
| 1823 | 0 | — |
| 1824 | 0 | — |
| 1825 | 0 | — |
| 1826 | 0 | — |
| 1827 | 0 | — |
| 1828 | 0 | — |
| 1829 | 10,992 | — |
| 1830 | 7,328 | -33.3% |
| 1831 | 3,664 | -50.0% |
| 1832 | 0 | -100.0% |
| 1833 | 0 | — |
| 1834 | 0 | — |
| 1835 | 14,656 | — |
| 1836 | 18,320 | +25.0% |
| 1837 | 25,648 | +40.0% |
| 1838 | 51,296 | +100.0% |
| 1839 | 40,304 | -21.4% |
| 1840 | 43,968 | +9.1% |
| 1841 | 58,624 | +33.3% |
| 1842 | 73,280 | +25.0% |
| 1843 | 62,288 | -15.0% |
| 1844 | 65,952 | +5.9% |
| 1845 | 98,928 | +50.0% |
| 1846 | 98,928 | +0.0% |
| 1847 | 102,592 | +3.7% |
| 1848 | 131,904 | +28.6% |
| 1849 | 106,256 | -19.4% |
| 1850 | 139,232 | +31.0% |
| 1851 | 150,224 | +7.9% |
| 1852 | 150,224 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 164,880 | +9.8% |
| 1854 | 234,496 | +42.2% |
| 1855 | 256,480 | +9.4% |
| 1856 | 304,112 | +18.6% |
| 1857 | 304,112 | +0.0% |
| 1858 | 267,472 | -12.0% |
| 1859 | 326,096 | +21.9% |
| 1860 | 333,424 | +2.2% |
| 1861 | 428,688 | +28.6% |
| 1862 | 370,064 | -13.7% |
| 1863 | 362,736 | -2.0% |
| 1864 | 479,984 | +32.3% |
| 1865 | 472,656 | -1.5% |
| 1866 | 520,288 | +10.1% |
| 1867 | 619,216 | +19.0% |
| 1868 | 633,872 | +2.4% |
| 1869 | 553,264 | -12.7% |
| 1870 | 630,208 | +13.9% |
| 1871 | 611,888 | -2.9% |
| 1872 | 655,856 | +7.2% |
| 1873 | 659,520 | +0.6% |
| 1874 | 817,072 | +23.9% |
| 1875 | 1.03 million | +25.6% |
| 1876 | 905,008 | -11.8% |
| 1877 | 1.22 million | +34.8% |
| 1878 | 1.09 million | -10.8% |
| 1879 | 1.14 million | +5.1% |
| 1880 | 1.25 million | +9.3% |
| 1881 | 1.29 million | +3.5% |
| 1882 | 1.41 million | +9.3% |
| 1883 | 1.52 million | +7.8% |
| 1884 | 1.56 million | +2.4% |
| 1885 | 1.78 million | +14.3% |
| 1886 | 1.74 million | -2.3% |
| 1887 | 1.68 million | -3.6% |
| 1888 | 1.95 million | +15.7% |
| 1889 | 2.22 million | +14.1% |
| 1890 | 2.08 million | -6.4% |
| 1891 | 2.41 million | +16.2% |
| 1892 | 2.47 million | +2.1% |
| 1893 | 2.46 million | -0.1% |
| 1894 | 2.91 million | +18.0% |
| 1895 | 3.06 million | +5.3% |
| 1896 | 3.13 million | +2.2% |
| 1897 | 3.39 million | +8.3% |
| 1898 | 3.39 million | +0.0% |
| 1899 | 4.05 million | +19.6% |
| 1900 | 4.15 million | +2.6% |
| 1901 | 3.89 million | -6.3% |
| 1902 | 4.24 million | +8.9% |
| 1903 | 4.24 million | -0.1% |
| 1904 | 4.16 million | -1.9% |
| 1905 | 4.15 million | -0.3% |
| 1906 | 4.22 million | +1.9% |
| 1907 | 4.78 million | +13.2% |
| 1908 | 5.72 million | +19.5% |
| 1909 | 5.76 million | +0.8% |
| 1910 | 5.94 million | +3.1% |
| 1911 | 6.08 million | +2.3% |
| 1912 | 6.88 million | +13.1% |
| 1913 | 6.92 million | +0.6% |
| 1914 | 7.71 million | +11.4% |
| 1915 | 8.45 million | +9.6% |
| 1916 | 7.90 million | -6.5% |
| 1917 | 3.50 million | -55.7% |
| 1918 | 4.45 million | +27.4% |
| 1919 | 5.29 million | +18.8% |
| 1920 | 5.30 million | +0.2% |
| 1921 | 3.37 million | -36.4% |
| 1922 | 6.48 million | +92.1% |
| 1923 | 6.79 million | +4.8% |
| 1924 | 7.73 million | +13.8% |
| 1925 | 7.60 million | -1.7% |
| 1926 | 6.36 million | -16.3% |
| 1927 | 8.67 million | +36.3% |
| 1928 | 8.45 million | -2.5% |
| 1929 | 9.52 million | +12.6% |
| 1930 | 8.73 million | -8.3% |
| 1931 | 8.09 million | -7.3% |
| 1932 | 8.64 million | +6.9% |
| 1933 | 9.18 million | +6.2% |
| 1934 | 9.49 million | +3.3% |
| 1935 | 9.78 million | +3.1% |
| 1936 | 10.44 million | +6.7% |
| 1937 | 11.76 million | +12.6% |
| 1938 | 10.48 million | -10.9% |
| 1939 | 12.51 million | +19.4% |
| 1940 | 6.51 million | -48.0% |
| 1941 | 4.81 million | -26.1% |
| 1942 | 4.63 million | -3.9% |
| 1943 | 5.44 million | +17.7% |
| 1944 | 4.88 million | -10.4% |
| 1945 | 4.01 million | -17.8% |
| 1946 | 7.07 million | +76.3% |
| 1947 | 10.63 million | +50.2% |
| 1948 | 10.98 million | +3.3% |
| 1949 | 10.41 million | -5.2% |
| 1950 | 8.43 million | -19.0% |
| 1951 | 9.48 million | +12.4% |
| 1952 | 9.68 million | +2.2% |
| 1953 | 9.78 million | +1.0% |
| 1954 | 9.88 million | +1.0% |
| 1955 | 11.41 million | +15.5% |
| 1956 | 11.95 million | +4.7% |
| 1957 | 11.36 million | -5.0% |
| 1958 | 11.19 million | -1.5% |
| 1959 | 11.81 million | +5.6% |
| 1960 | 13.09 million | +10.8% |
| 1961 | 13.34 million | +1.9% |
| 1962 | 14.06 million | +5.4% |
| 1963 | 14.97 million | +6.4% |
| 1964 | 16.17 million | +8.1% |
| 1965 | 16.39 million | +1.4% |
| 1966 | 19.54 million | +19.2% |
| 1967 | 19.30 million | -1.2% |
| 1968 | 21.11 million | +9.4% |
| 1969 | 22.19 million | +5.1% |
| 1970 | 27.98 million | +26.1% |
| 1971 | 27.17 million | -2.9% |
| 1972 | 29.40 million | +8.2% |
| 1973 | 30.49 million | +3.7% |
| 1974 | 27.69 million | -9.2% |
| 1975 | 30.60 million | +10.5% |
| 1976 | 33.33 million | +8.9% |
| 1977 | 33.31 million | -0.1% |
| 1978 | 32.62 million | -2.1% |
| 1979 | 34.63 million | +6.1% |
| 1980 | 31.78 million | -8.2% |
| 1981 | 31.80 million | +0.1% |
| 1982 | 30.91 million | -2.8% |
| 1983 | 31.95 million | +3.3% |
| 1984 | 33.81 million | +5.8% |
| 1985 | 32.29 million | -4.5% |
| 1986 | 34.79 million | +7.7% |
| 1987 | 33.21 million | -4.5% |
| 1988 | 35.59 million | +7.2% |
| 1989 | 34.15 million | -4.1% |
| 1990 | 35.01 million | +2.5% |
| 1991 | 33.47 million | -4.4% |
| 1992 | 34.40 million | +2.8% |
| 1993 | 35.95 million | +4.5% |
| 1994 | 37.86 million | +5.3% |
| 1995 | 38.47 million | +1.6% |
| 1996 | 41.54 million | +8.0% |
| 1997 | 41.64 million | +0.3% |
| 1998 | 41.84 million | +0.5% |
| 1999 | 42.61 million | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 42.13 million | -1.1% |
| 2001 | 43.52 million | +3.3% |
| 2002 | 42.57 million | -2.2% |
| 2003 | 43.92 million | +3.2% |
| 2004 | 44.26 million | +0.8% |
| 2005 | 43.28 million | -2.2% |
| 2006 | 43.86 million | +1.3% |
| 2007 | 45.60 million | +4.0% |
| 2008 | 44.69 million | -2.0% |
| 2009 | 43.10 million | -3.6% |
| 2010 | 45.66 million | +5.9% |
| 2011 | 44.77 million | -1.9% |
| 2012 | 44.26 million | -1.2% |
| 2013 | 44.54 million | +0.6% |
| 2014 | 44.98 million | +1.0% |
| 2015 | 45.52 million | +1.2% |
| 2016 | 44.71 million | -1.8% |
| 2017 | 44.20 million | -1.1% |
| 2018 | 44.47 million | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 42.87 million | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 41.27 million | -3.7% |
| 2021 | 41.06 million | -0.5% |
| 2022 | 40.83 million | -0.5% |
| 2023 | 38.87 million | -4.8% |
| 2024 | 37.18 million | -4.3% |
Norway compared with similar countries
- Norway's 37.18 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 30.70 million, 1.2× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Norway's 37.18 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.69 million, 1.1× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Norway changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1832 | -100.0% | 3,664 | 0 |
| 1838 | +100.0% | 25,648 | 51,296 |
| 1922 | +92.1% | 3.37 million | 6.48 million |
| 1946 | +76.3% | 4.01 million | 7.07 million |
| 1917 | -55.7% | 7.90 million | 3.50 million |
| 1831 | -50.0% | 7,328 | 3,664 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1750s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1760s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1770s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1820s | 1,099 | 0 | 10,992 | 10 |
| 1830s | 16,122 | 0 | 51,296 | 10 |
| 1840s | 84,272 | 43,968 | 131,904 | 10 |
| 1850s | 229,733 | 139,232 | 326,096 | 10 |
| 1860s | 477,419 | 333,424 | 633,872 | 10 |
| 1870s | 875,696 | 611,888 | 1.22 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 1.64 million | 1.25 million | 2.22 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.93 million | 2.08 million | 4.05 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 4.53 million | 3.89 million | 5.76 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 6.31 million | 3.50 million | 8.45 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 7.03 million | 3.37 million | 9.52 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 9.91 million | 8.09 million | 12.51 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 6.94 million | 4.01 million | 10.98 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 10.50 million | 8.43 million | 11.95 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 17.02 million | 13.09 million | 22.19 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 30.72 million | 27.17 million | 34.63 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 33.03 million | 30.91 million | 35.59 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 38.28 million | 33.47 million | 42.61 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 43.69 million | 42.13 million | 45.60 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.60 million | 42.87 million | 45.66 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 39.84 million | 37.18 million | 41.27 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Norway
More climate change data for Norway
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 147.21 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,074 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 927.05 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,147 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 112.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 904.43 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 902.03 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2.4 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 3.4 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Norway?
- Co2 income level in Norway was 37.18 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Norway?
- The highest recorded value was 45.66 million in 2010.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Norway?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1750.
- How does Norway rank for co2 income level?
- Norway ranks 65th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Norway?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Norway data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 275 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).