Co2 income level in Sweden
Sweden: Co2 income level was 38.10 million in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
38.10 million
Change on year
up 3.8%
World rank
64th
of 215 countries
All-time high
92.29 million
in 1970
All-time low
32,976
in 1834
Years of data
187
1834–2024
Co2 income level in Sweden, 1834–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 income level in Sweden stood at 38.10 million.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.8% on the previous year and down 12.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 income level in Sweden peaked at 92.29 million in 1970 and was at its lowest, 32,976, in 1834.
That places Sweden 64th out of 215 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 income level in Sweden, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1834 | 32,976 | — |
| 1839 | 43,968 | +33.3% |
| 1840 | 40,304 | -8.3% |
| 1841 | 40,304 | +0.0% |
| 1842 | 80,608 | +100.0% |
| 1843 | 58,624 | -27.3% |
| 1844 | 98,928 | +68.8% |
| 1845 | 87,936 | -11.1% |
| 1846 | 80,608 | -8.3% |
| 1847 | 80,608 | +0.0% |
| 1848 | 139,232 | +72.7% |
| 1849 | 194,192 | +39.5% |
| 1850 | 201,520 | +3.8% |
| 1851 | 216,176 | +7.3% |
| 1852 | 216,176 | +0.0% |
| 1853 | 227,168 | +5.1% |
| 1854 | 337,088 | +48.4% |
| 1855 | 315,104 | -6.5% |
| 1856 | 476,320 | +51.2% |
| 1857 | 611,888 | +28.5% |
| 1858 | 512,960 | -16.2% |
| 1859 | 754,784 | +47.1% |
| 1860 | 751,120 | -0.5% |
| 1861 | 967,296 | +28.8% |
| 1862 | 985,616 | +1.9% |
| 1863 | 985,616 | +0.0% |
| 1864 | 1.04 million | +5.2% |
| 1865 | 1.08 million | +4.2% |
| 1866 | 1.11 million | +3.1% |
| 1867 | 1.04 million | -6.9% |
| 1868 | 1.22 million | +18.0% |
| 1869 | 1.09 million | -11.1% |
| 1870 | 1.34 million | +23.2% |
| 1871 | 1.43 million | +6.8% |
| 1872 | 1.71 million | +19.4% |
| 1873 | 1.74 million | +1.5% |
| 1874 | 1.87 million | +7.8% |
| 1875 | 2.28 million | +21.5% |
| 1876 | 2.43 million | +6.8% |
| 1877 | 2.57 million | +5.9% |
| 1878 | 2.18 million | -15.2% |
| 1879 | 2.21 million | +1.5% |
| 1880 | 2.83 million | +27.8% |
| 1881 | 2.75 million | -2.7% |
| 1882 | 3.15 million | +14.4% |
| 1883 | 3.22 million | +2.2% |
| 1884 | 3.55 million | +10.4% |
| 1885 | 3.83 million | +7.8% |
| 1886 | 3.75 million | -2.0% |
| 1887 | 3.80 million | +1.4% |
| 1888 | 4.25 million | +11.7% |
| 1889 | 4.96 million | +16.7% |
| 1890 | 4.95 million | -0.2% |
| 1891 | 5.28 million | +6.7% |
| 1892 | 5.25 million | -0.6% |
| 1893 | 5.28 million | +0.6% |
| 1894 | 5.89 million | +11.6% |
| 1895 | 5.95 million | +1.1% |
| 1896 | 6.16 million | +3.4% |
| 1897 | 6.86 million | +11.4% |
| 1898 | 7.30 million | +6.5% |
| 1899 | 9.13 million | +25.2% |
| 1900 | 9.17 million | +0.4% |
| 1901 | 8.52 million | -7.1% |
| 1902 | 8.93 million | +4.7% |
| 1903 | 9.80 million | +9.9% |
| 1904 | 10.33 million | +5.3% |
| 1905 | 10.16 million | -1.6% |
| 1906 | 11.29 million | +11.1% |
| 1907 | 12.77 million | +13.1% |
| 1908 | 13.76 million | +7.7% |
| 1909 | 12.67 million | -7.9% |
| 1910 | 13.12 million | +3.5% |
| 1911 | 12.79 million | -2.5% |
| 1912 | 14.19 million | +10.9% |
| 1913 | 15.95 million | +12.4% |
| 1914 | 14.99 million | -6.1% |
| 1915 | 15.10 million | +0.8% |
| 1916 | 15.93 million | +5.5% |
| 1917 | 6.90 million | -56.7% |
| 1918 | 8.12 million | +17.6% |
| 1919 | 7.80 million | -3.9% |
| 1920 | 10.54 million | +35.2% |
| 1921 | 6.13 million | -41.8% |
| 1922 | 10.13 million | +65.1% |
| 1923 | 12.29 million | +21.4% |
| 1924 | 14.64 million | +19.1% |
| 1925 | 13.12 million | -10.4% |
| 1926 | 12.77 million | -2.7% |
| 1927 | 17.87 million | +40.0% |
| 1928 | 16.24 million | -9.1% |
| 1929 | 19.37 million | +19.2% |
| 1930 | 18.93 million | -2.3% |
| 1931 | 18.94 million | +0.1% |
| 1932 | 18.74 million | -1.1% |
| 1933 | 19.52 million | +4.2% |
| 1934 | 21.73 million | +11.3% |
| 1935 | 22.86 million | +5.2% |
| 1936 | 25.05 million | +9.6% |
| 1937 | 28.94 million | +15.5% |
| 1938 | 26.14 million | -9.7% |
| 1939 | 29.30 million | +12.1% |
| 1940 | 18.47 million | -36.9% |
| 1941 | 15.04 million | -18.6% |
| 1942 | 13.02 million | -13.4% |
| 1943 | 15.84 million | +21.6% |
| 1944 | 12.44 million | -21.4% |
| 1945 | 4.55 million | -63.4% |
| 1946 | 17.38 million | +281.9% |
| 1947 | 25.09 million | +44.4% |
| 1948 | 30.80 million | +22.8% |
| 1949 | 26.83 million | -12.9% |
| 1950 | 28.66 million | +6.8% |
| 1951 | 33.48 million | +16.8% |
| 1952 | 34.56 million | +3.2% |
| 1953 | 32.56 million | -5.8% |
| 1954 | 34.50 million | +6.0% |
| 1955 | 39.11 million | +13.3% |
| 1956 | 43.38 million | +10.9% |
| 1957 | 38.85 million | -10.5% |
| 1958 | 42.07 million | +8.3% |
| 1959 | 42.39 million | +0.8% |
| 1960 | 49.17 million | +16.0% |
| 1961 | 48.80 million | -0.7% |
| 1962 | 51.27 million | +5.1% |
| 1963 | 55.31 million | +7.9% |
| 1964 | 60.37 million | +9.1% |
| 1965 | 62.57 million | +3.6% |
| 1966 | 72.52 million | +15.9% |
| 1967 | 68.93 million | -4.9% |
| 1968 | 77.61 million | +12.6% |
| 1969 | 86.38 million | +11.3% |
| 1970 | 92.29 million | +6.8% |
| 1971 | 84.51 million | -8.4% |
| 1972 | 84.70 million | +0.2% |
| 1973 | 87.29 million | +3.1% |
| 1974 | 79.82 million | -8.6% |
| 1975 | 80.76 million | +1.2% |
| 1976 | 88.24 million | +9.3% |
| 1977 | 85.74 million | -2.8% |
| 1978 | 79.48 million | -7.3% |
| 1979 | 84.87 million | +6.8% |
| 1980 | 71.71 million | -15.5% |
| 1981 | 69.39 million | -3.2% |
| 1982 | 62.26 million | -10.3% |
| 1983 | 58.27 million | -6.4% |
| 1984 | 57.31 million | -1.6% |
| 1985 | 62.36 million | +8.8% |
| 1986 | 62.01 million | -0.6% |
| 1987 | 59.69 million | -3.7% |
| 1988 | 57.43 million | -3.8% |
| 1989 | 55.52 million | -3.3% |
| 1990 | 57.42 million | +3.4% |
| 1991 | 57.66 million | +0.4% |
| 1992 | 57.51 million | -0.3% |
| 1993 | 57.52 million | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 60.00 million | +4.3% |
| 1995 | 59.49 million | -0.9% |
| 1996 | 63.35 million | +6.5% |
| 1997 | 58.36 million | -7.9% |
| 1998 | 58.77 million | +0.7% |
| 1999 | 55.94 million | -4.8% |
| 2000 | 54.89 million | -1.9% |
| 2001 | 55.78 million | +1.6% |
| 2002 | 56.63 million | +1.5% |
| 2003 | 57.22 million | +1.0% |
| 2004 | 56.43 million | -1.4% |
| 2005 | 53.79 million | -4.7% |
| 2006 | 53.65 million | -0.3% |
| 2007 | 52.88 million | -1.4% |
| 2008 | 50.77 million | -4.0% |
| 2009 | 47.14 million | -7.1% |
| 2010 | 53.03 million | +12.5% |
| 2011 | 49.11 million | -7.4% |
| 2012 | 46.61 million | -5.1% |
| 2013 | 45.11 million | -3.2% |
| 2014 | 43.38 million | -3.8% |
| 2015 | 43.31 million | -0.2% |
| 2016 | 43.31 million | -0.0% |
| 2017 | 42.36 million | -2.2% |
| 2018 | 41.86 million | -1.2% |
| 2019 | 40.77 million | -2.6% |
| 2020 | 36.62 million | -10.2% |
| 2021 | 38.57 million | +5.3% |
| 2022 | 36.34 million | -5.8% |
| 2023 | 36.71 million | +1.0% |
| 2024 | 38.10 million | +3.8% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's 38.10 million is above the median for high income countries, which is 30.70 million, 1.2× the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Sweden's 38.10 million is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 32.69 million, 1.2× the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 income level in Sweden changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1946 | +281.9% | 4.55 million | 17.38 million |
| 1842 | +100.0% | 40,304 | 80,608 |
| 1848 | +72.7% | 80,608 | 139,232 |
| 1844 | +68.8% | 58,624 | 98,928 |
| 1945 | -63.4% | 12.44 million | 4.55 million |
| 1922 | +65.1% | 6.13 million | 10.13 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 38,472 | 32,976 | 43,968 | 2 |
| 1840s | 90,134 | 40,304 | 194,192 | 10 |
| 1850s | 386,918 | 201,520 | 754,784 | 10 |
| 1860s | 1.03 million | 751,120 | 1.22 million | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.98 million | 1.34 million | 2.57 million | 10 |
| 1880s | 3.61 million | 2.75 million | 4.96 million | 10 |
| 1890s | 6.20 million | 4.95 million | 9.13 million | 10 |
| 1900s | 10.74 million | 8.52 million | 13.76 million | 10 |
| 1910s | 12.49 million | 6.90 million | 15.95 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 13.31 million | 6.13 million | 19.37 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 23.02 million | 18.74 million | 29.30 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 17.95 million | 4.55 million | 30.80 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 36.96 million | 28.66 million | 43.38 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 63.29 million | 48.80 million | 86.38 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 84.77 million | 79.48 million | 92.29 million | 10 |
| 1980s | 61.59 million | 55.52 million | 71.71 million | 10 |
| 1990s | 58.60 million | 55.94 million | 63.35 million | 10 |
| 2000s | 53.92 million | 47.14 million | 57.22 million | 10 |
| 2010s | 44.88 million | 40.77 million | 53.03 million | 10 |
| 2020s | 37.27 million | 36.34 million | 38.57 million | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
More climate change data for Sweden
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 160.40 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,738 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 983.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,754 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 134.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,196 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,185 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.86 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.47 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 income level in Sweden?
- Co2 income level in Sweden was 38.10 million in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 income level recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 92.29 million in 1970.
- What is the lowest co2 income level recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was 32,976 in 1834.
- How does Sweden rank for co2 income level?
- Sweden ranks 64th out of 215 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 income level rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is down 12.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 income level. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 187 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).