Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden
Sweden: Co2 intensity, annual growth rate was -8.2 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
-8.2 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 11,759.6%
World rank
134th
of 164 countries
All-time high
243.68 % change on previous year
in 1946
All-time low
-64.79 % change on previous year
in 1945
Years of data
183
1840–2022
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden, 1840–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Sweden recorded -8.2 % change on previous year for co2 intensity, annual growth rate in 2022.
That represents a change of down 11,759.6% on the previous year and down 80.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden peaked at 243.68 % change on previous year in 1946 and was at its lowest, -64.79 % change on previous year, in 1945.
Sweden ranks 134th of 164 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1840 | -10.34 % change on previous year | — |
| 1841 | 0.1682 % change on previous year | -101.6% |
| 1842 | 107.66 % change on previous year | +63921.7% |
| 1843 | -29.5 % change on previous year | -127.4% |
| 1844 | 60.04 % change on previous year | -303.5% |
| 1845 | -14.21 % change on previous year | -123.7% |
| 1846 | -6 % change on previous year | -57.8% |
| 1847 | -3.15 % change on previous year | -47.5% |
| 1848 | 69.38 % change on previous year | -2303.0% |
| 1849 | 32.93 % change on previous year | -52.5% |
| 1850 | -0.0848 % change on previous year | -100.3% |
| 1851 | 8.19 % change on previous year | -9759.9% |
| 1852 | 1.41 % change on previous year | -82.8% |
| 1853 | 3.03 % change on previous year | +114.8% |
| 1854 | 45.41 % change on previous year | +1400.4% |
| 1855 | -12.85 % change on previous year | -128.3% |
| 1856 | 51.28 % change on previous year | -498.9% |
| 1857 | 24.29 % change on previous year | -52.6% |
| 1858 | -17.86 % change on previous year | -173.5% |
| 1859 | 40.24 % change on previous year | -325.3% |
| 1860 | -3.89 % change on previous year | -109.7% |
| 1861 | 31.82 % change on previous year | -918.2% |
| 1862 | 3.67 % change on previous year | -88.5% |
| 1863 | -5.38 % change on previous year | -246.9% |
| 1864 | 2.07 % change on previous year | -138.4% |
| 1865 | 1.27 % change on previous year | -38.3% |
| 1866 | 3.63 % change on previous year | +184.6% |
| 1867 | -9.15 % change on previous year | -352.1% |
| 1868 | 30.41 % change on previous year | -432.5% |
| 1869 | -17.3 % change on previous year | -156.9% |
| 1870 | 9.38 % change on previous year | -154.2% |
| 1871 | 2.68 % change on previous year | -71.4% |
| 1872 | 16.18 % change on previous year | +504.6% |
| 1873 | -0.716 % change on previous year | -104.4% |
| 1874 | 2.79 % change on previous year | -489.4% |
| 1875 | 24.78 % change on previous year | +788.8% |
| 1876 | -0.6074 % change on previous year | -102.5% |
| 1877 | 7.05 % change on previous year | -1260.4% |
| 1878 | -13.06 % change on previous year | -285.2% |
| 1879 | -4.73 % change on previous year | -63.7% |
| 1880 | 30.42 % change on previous year | -742.7% |
| 1881 | -6.06 % change on previous year | -119.9% |
| 1882 | 18.6 % change on previous year | -406.8% |
| 1883 | -5.25 % change on previous year | -128.2% |
| 1884 | 11.97 % change on previous year | -328.1% |
| 1885 | 5.01 % change on previous year | -58.1% |
| 1886 | -3.71 % change on previous year | -174.1% |
| 1887 | 3.91 % change on previous year | -205.3% |
| 1888 | 9.53 % change on previous year | +143.8% |
| 1889 | 14.52 % change on previous year | +52.3% |
| 1890 | -2.79 % change on previous year | -119.2% |
| 1891 | 0.9295 % change on previous year | -133.3% |
| 1892 | 0.497 % change on previous year | -46.5% |
| 1893 | -2.02 % change on previous year | -506.2% |
| 1894 | 10.31 % change on previous year | -610.9% |
| 1895 | -4.56 % change on previous year | -144.2% |
| 1896 | -0.1497 % change on previous year | -96.7% |
| 1897 | 6.19 % change on previous year | -4235.6% |
| 1898 | 1.92 % change on previous year | -69.1% |
| 1899 | 21.07 % change on previous year | +999.4% |
| 1900 | -0.6851 % change on previous year | -103.3% |
| 1901 | -10.1 % change on previous year | +1374.6% |
| 1902 | 5.47 % change on previous year | -154.1% |
| 1903 | 3.9 % change on previous year | -28.7% |
| 1904 | 2.94 % change on previous year | -24.6% |
| 1905 | -0.8186 % change on previous year | -127.9% |
| 1906 | 2.18 % change on previous year | -366.0% |
| 1907 | 5.22 % change on previous year | +139.5% |
| 1908 | 10.15 % change on previous year | +94.7% |
| 1909 | -9.2 % change on previous year | -190.6% |
| 1910 | 0.8164 % change on previous year | -108.9% |
| 1911 | -5.58 % change on previous year | -784.0% |
| 1912 | 6.06 % change on previous year | -208.5% |
| 1913 | 5.13 % change on previous year | -15.4% |
| 1914 | -8.63 % change on previous year | -268.4% |
| 1915 | -3.25 % change on previous year | -62.4% |
| 1916 | -0.7161 % change on previous year | -78.0% |
| 1917 | -54.22 % change on previous year | +7471.3% |
| 1918 | 26.62 % change on previous year | -149.1% |
| 1919 | -5.77 % change on previous year | -121.7% |
| 1920 | 26.16 % change on previous year | -553.7% |
| 1921 | -39.23 % change on previous year | -250.0% |
| 1922 | 53 % change on previous year | -235.1% |
| 1923 | 17.15 % change on previous year | -67.6% |
| 1924 | 11.06 % change on previous year | -35.5% |
| 1925 | -12.76 % change on previous year | -215.3% |
| 1926 | -7.49 % change on previous year | -41.3% |
| 1927 | 35.22 % change on previous year | -570.1% |
| 1928 | -11.89 % change on previous year | -133.8% |
| 1929 | 12.26 % change on previous year | -203.1% |
| 1930 | -6.57 % change on previous year | -153.6% |
| 1931 | 2.34 % change on previous year | -135.7% |
| 1932 | 2.52 % change on previous year | +7.8% |
| 1933 | 2.07 % change on previous year | -18.1% |
| 1934 | 4.23 % change on previous year | +104.7% |
| 1935 | 0.2559 % change on previous year | -93.9% |
| 1936 | 5.77 % change on previous year | +2153.0% |
| 1937 | 12.45 % change on previous year | +116.0% |
| 1938 | -12.68 % change on previous year | -201.9% |
| 1939 | 4.16 % change on previous year | -132.8% |
| 1940 | -32.13 % change on previous year | -873.0% |
| 1941 | -16.54 % change on previous year | -48.5% |
| 1942 | -14.53 % change on previous year | -12.2% |
| 1943 | 17.08 % change on previous year | -217.6% |
| 1944 | -24.29 % change on previous year | -242.2% |
| 1945 | -64.79 % change on previous year | +166.7% |
| 1946 | 243.68 % change on previous year | -476.1% |
| 1947 | 32.21 % change on previous year | -86.8% |
| 1948 | 19.93 % change on previous year | -38.1% |
| 1949 | -16.38 % change on previous year | -182.2% |
| 1950 | -0.1522 % change on previous year | -99.1% |
| 1951 | 12.39 % change on previous year | -8240.3% |
| 1952 | 1.75 % change on previous year | -85.9% |
| 1953 | -8.35 % change on previous year | -576.7% |
| 1954 | 1.7 % change on previous year | -120.3% |
| 1955 | 10.14 % change on previous year | +497.6% |
| 1956 | 6.87 % change on previous year | -32.2% |
| 1957 | -14.3 % change on previous year | -308.2% |
| 1958 | 7.78 % change on previous year | -154.4% |
| 1959 | -2.23 % change on previous year | -128.6% |
| 1960 | 10.14 % change on previous year | -555.4% |
| 1961 | -6.12 % change on previous year | -160.4% |
| 1962 | 0.8151 % change on previous year | -113.3% |
| 1963 | 2.43 % change on previous year | +198.4% |
| 1964 | 2.17 % change on previous year | -10.9% |
| 1965 | -0.1844 % change on previous year | -108.5% |
| 1966 | 13.54 % change on previous year | -7440.1% |
| 1967 | -8.05 % change on previous year | -159.5% |
| 1968 | 8.65 % change on previous year | -207.5% |
| 1969 | 6 % change on previous year | -30.7% |
| 1970 | 0.3328 % change on previous year | -94.5% |
| 1971 | -9.28 % change on previous year | -2887.6% |
| 1972 | -2.02 % change on previous year | -78.2% |
| 1973 | -0.8859 % change on previous year | -56.1% |
| 1974 | -11.39 % change on previous year | +1185.6% |
| 1975 | -1.34 % change on previous year | -88.2% |
| 1976 | 8.12 % change on previous year | -706.8% |
| 1977 | -1.27 % change on previous year | -115.6% |
| 1978 | -8.9 % change on previous year | +603.0% |
| 1979 | 2.83 % change on previous year | -131.8% |
| 1980 | -16.88 % change on previous year | -695.8% |
| 1981 | -3.23 % change on previous year | -80.9% |
| 1982 | -11.17 % change on previous year | +246.1% |
| 1983 | -8.02 % change on previous year | -28.2% |
| 1984 | -5.4 % change on previous year | -32.6% |
| 1985 | 6.77 % change on previous year | -225.2% |
| 1986 | -2.71 % change on previous year | -140.0% |
| 1987 | -6.57 % change on previous year | +142.7% |
| 1988 | -5.81 % change on previous year | -11.5% |
| 1989 | -5.56 % change on previous year | -4.3% |
| 1990 | 2.12 % change on previous year | -138.2% |
| 1991 | 1.39 % change on previous year | -34.3% |
| 1992 | 0.6607 % change on previous year | -52.6% |
| 1993 | 1.83 % change on previous year | +176.3% |
| 1994 | 0.0085 % change on previous year | -99.5% |
| 1995 | -4.87 % change on previous year | -57752.2% |
| 1996 | 4.52 % change on previous year | -192.7% |
| 1997 | -10.56 % change on previous year | -333.8% |
| 1998 | -3.62 % change on previous year | -65.7% |
| 1999 | -9.31 % change on previous year | +156.7% |
| 2000 | -6.31 % change on previous year | -32.2% |
| 2001 | -0.0083 % change on previous year | -99.9% |
| 2002 | -1.37 % change on previous year | +16454.7% |
| 2003 | -1.73 % change on previous year | +26.1% |
| 2004 | -5.86 % change on previous year | +238.5% |
| 2005 | -8.07 % change on previous year | +37.7% |
| 2006 | -5.01 % change on previous year | -37.9% |
| 2007 | -5.42 % change on previous year | +8.2% |
| 2008 | -4.27 % change on previous year | -21.2% |
| 2009 | -3.16 % change on previous year | -25.9% |
| 2010 | 4.94 % change on previous year | -256.2% |
| 2011 | -6.87 % change on previous year | -239.0% |
| 2012 | -4.54 % change on previous year | -33.8% |
| 2013 | -4.36 % change on previous year | -4.1% |
| 2014 | -6.31 % change on previous year | +44.7% |
| 2015 | -4.46 % change on previous year | -29.2% |
| 2016 | -2.03 % change on previous year | -54.4% |
| 2017 | -4.65 % change on previous year | +128.7% |
| 2018 | -3.07 % change on previous year | -34.0% |
| 2019 | -4.49 % change on previous year | +46.1% |
| 2020 | -8.19 % change on previous year | +82.5% |
| 2021 | -0.0691 % change on previous year | -99.2% |
| 2022 | -8.2 % change on previous year | +11759.6% |
Sweden compared with similar countries
- Sweden's -8.2 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -4.8 % change on previous year, 1.7× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Sweden's -8.2 % change on previous year is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -5.31 % change on previous year, 1.5× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1842 | +63921.7% | 0.1682 % change on previous year | 107.66 % change on previous year |
| 1995 | -57752.2% | 0.0085 % change on previous year | -4.87 % change on previous year |
| 2002 | -16454.7% | -0.0083 % change on previous year | -1.37 % change on previous year |
| 2022 | -11759.6% | -0.0691 % change on previous year | -8.2 % change on previous year |
| 1851 | +9759.9% | -0.0848 % change on previous year | 8.19 % change on previous year |
| 1951 | +8240.3% | -0.1522 % change on previous year | 12.39 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 20.7 % change on previous year | -29.5 % change on previous year | 107.66 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1850s | 14.3 % change on previous year | -17.86 % change on previous year | 51.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1860s | 3.71 % change on previous year | -17.3 % change on previous year | 31.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1870s | 4.37 % change on previous year | -13.06 % change on previous year | 24.78 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1880s | 7.89 % change on previous year | -6.06 % change on previous year | 30.42 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | 3.14 % change on previous year | -4.56 % change on previous year | 21.07 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.9042 % change on previous year | -10.1 % change on previous year | 10.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -3.96 % change on previous year | -54.22 % change on previous year | 26.62 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | 8.35 % change on previous year | -39.23 % change on previous year | 53 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | 1.45 % change on previous year | -12.68 % change on previous year | 12.45 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | 14.42 % change on previous year | -64.79 % change on previous year | 243.68 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 1.56 % change on previous year | -14.3 % change on previous year | 12.39 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.94 % change on previous year | -8.05 % change on previous year | 13.54 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -2.38 % change on previous year | -11.39 % change on previous year | 8.12 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -5.86 % change on previous year | -16.88 % change on previous year | 6.77 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.78 % change on previous year | -10.56 % change on previous year | 4.52 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -4.12 % change on previous year | -8.07 % change on previous year | -0.0083 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -3.58 % change on previous year | -6.87 % change on previous year | 4.94 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | -5.48 % change on previous year | -8.2 % change on previous year | -0.0691 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Sweden
- 131 Lithuania -8.14 % change on previous year compare
- 132 Paraguay -8.17 % change on previous year compare
- 133 Argentina -8.19 % change on previous year compare
- 135 Mali -8.44 % change on previous year compare
- 136 Uzbekistan -8.48 % change on previous year compare
- 137 Uruguay -8.66 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Sweden
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 160.40 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,738 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 983.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 3,754 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.71 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 134.07 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,196 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,185 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.86 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 4.47 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden?
- Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Sweden was -8.2 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Sweden?
- The highest recorded value was 243.68 % change on previous year in 1946.
- What is the lowest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Sweden?
- The lowest recorded value was -64.79 % change on previous year in 1945.
- How does Sweden rank for co2 intensity, annual growth rate?
- Sweden ranks 134th out of 164 countries with data for 2022.
- Is co2 intensity, annual growth rate rising or falling in Sweden?
- Over the last ten years it is down 80.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sweden data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 183 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Co2 intensity Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.