Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay
Uruguay: Co2 intensity, annual growth rate was -8.66 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2022)
-8.66 % change on previous year
Change on year
down 154.8%
World rank
137th
of 164 countries
All-time high
406.97 % change on previous year
in 1950
All-time low
-45.22 % change on previous year
in 1946
Years of data
152
1871–2022
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay, 1871–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay stood at -8.66 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 154.8% on the previous year and down 206.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay peaked at 406.97 % change on previous year in 1950 and was at its lowest, -45.22 % change on previous year, in 1946.
That places Uruguay 137th out of 164 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1871 | -24.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1872 | 12.27 % change on previous year | -150.8% |
| 1873 | -25.45 % change on previous year | -307.4% |
| 1874 | 91.03 % change on previous year | -457.6% |
| 1875 | -23.08 % change on previous year | -125.4% |
| 1876 | -8.91 % change on previous year | -61.4% |
| 1877 | 16.36 % change on previous year | -283.7% |
| 1878 | -15.76 % change on previous year | -196.3% |
| 1879 | 2.01 % change on previous year | -112.8% |
| 1880 | 4.57 % change on previous year | +127.2% |
| 1881 | 27.64 % change on previous year | +504.7% |
| 1882 | -28.76 % change on previous year | -204.1% |
| 1883 | 5.15 % change on previous year | -117.9% |
| 1884 | 21.95 % change on previous year | +325.9% |
| 1885 | 2.22 % change on previous year | -89.9% |
| 1886 | -35.79 % change on previous year | -1711.7% |
| 1887 | 69.61 % change on previous year | -294.5% |
| 1888 | -11.7 % change on previous year | -116.8% |
| 1889 | 76.7 % change on previous year | -755.3% |
| 1890 | -37.48 % change on previous year | -148.9% |
| 1891 | -20.22 % change on previous year | -46.1% |
| 1892 | -17.73 % change on previous year | -12.3% |
| 1893 | 11.04 % change on previous year | -162.3% |
| 1894 | 16.41 % change on previous year | +48.6% |
| 1895 | -2.4 % change on previous year | -114.6% |
| 1896 | 0.127 % change on previous year | -105.3% |
| 1897 | -20.87 % change on previous year | -16530.2% |
| 1898 | 70.1 % change on previous year | -435.9% |
| 1899 | -4.64 % change on previous year | -106.6% |
| 1900 | 30.32 % change on previous year | -753.0% |
| 1901 | -4.11 % change on previous year | -113.5% |
| 1902 | 21.61 % change on previous year | -626.2% |
| 1903 | -14.42 % change on previous year | -166.7% |
| 1904 | -31.86 % change on previous year | +120.9% |
| 1905 | 2.66 % change on previous year | -108.3% |
| 1906 | 58.37 % change on previous year | +2096.9% |
| 1907 | 20.71 % change on previous year | -64.5% |
| 1908 | 6.2 % change on previous year | -70.1% |
| 1909 | -3.89 % change on previous year | -162.8% |
| 1910 | -0.2029 % change on previous year | -94.8% |
| 1911 | -6.42 % change on previous year | +3066.4% |
| 1912 | -20.83 % change on previous year | +224.2% |
| 1913 | -5.77 % change on previous year | -72.3% |
| 1914 | -4.02 % change on previous year | -30.2% |
| 1915 | -21.09 % change on previous year | +424.2% |
| 1916 | -33.04 % change on previous year | +56.7% |
| 1917 | -17.59 % change on previous year | -46.8% |
| 1918 | 28 % change on previous year | -259.2% |
| 1919 | -13.83 % change on previous year | -149.4% |
| 1920 | 18.47 % change on previous year | -233.6% |
| 1921 | -18.57 % change on previous year | -200.5% |
| 1922 | 41.09 % change on previous year | -321.3% |
| 1923 | -20.33 % change on previous year | -149.5% |
| 1924 | 5.5 % change on previous year | -127.1% |
| 1925 | -28.77 % change on previous year | -623.1% |
| 1926 | -17.14 % change on previous year | -40.4% |
| 1927 | -20.46 % change on previous year | +19.4% |
| 1928 | -20.97 % change on previous year | +2.5% |
| 1929 | 38.63 % change on previous year | -284.2% |
| 1930 | -29.22 % change on previous year | -175.6% |
| 1931 | 41.44 % change on previous year | -241.8% |
| 1932 | -8.91 % change on previous year | -121.5% |
| 1933 | 15.91 % change on previous year | -278.6% |
| 1934 | -19.29 % change on previous year | -221.2% |
| 1935 | 8.23 % change on previous year | -142.6% |
| 1936 | 5.42 % change on previous year | -34.1% |
| 1937 | -15.1 % change on previous year | -378.5% |
| 1938 | -15.48 % change on previous year | +2.5% |
| 1939 | 15.64 % change on previous year | -201.0% |
| 1940 | 17.65 % change on previous year | +12.8% |
| 1941 | -22.97 % change on previous year | -230.1% |
| 1942 | -22.91 % change on previous year | -0.3% |
| 1943 | 47.76 % change on previous year | -308.5% |
| 1944 | -23.76 % change on previous year | -149.8% |
| 1945 | 18.02 % change on previous year | -175.8% |
| 1946 | -45.22 % change on previous year | -351.0% |
| 1947 | -16.04 % change on previous year | -64.5% |
| 1948 | 4.11 % change on previous year | -125.6% |
| 1949 | -11.53 % change on previous year | -380.4% |
| 1950 | 406.97 % change on previous year | -3630.3% |
| 1951 | -4.1 % change on previous year | -101.0% |
| 1952 | 21.81 % change on previous year | -632.4% |
| 1953 | 0.4045 % change on previous year | -98.1% |
| 1954 | 2 % change on previous year | +393.8% |
| 1955 | 4.5 % change on previous year | +125.3% |
| 1956 | 0.455 % change on previous year | -89.9% |
| 1957 | 9.23 % change on previous year | +1927.5% |
| 1958 | -7.14 % change on previous year | -177.4% |
| 1959 | 13.72 % change on previous year | -292.2% |
| 1960 | -5.51 % change on previous year | -140.2% |
| 1961 | -6.99 % change on previous year | +26.7% |
| 1962 | -0.8681 % change on previous year | -87.6% |
| 1963 | 6.99 % change on previous year | -905.6% |
| 1964 | 3.6 % change on previous year | -48.6% |
| 1965 | 19.84 % change on previous year | +451.3% |
| 1966 | -5.59 % change on previous year | -128.2% |
| 1967 | -5.78 % change on previous year | +3.3% |
| 1968 | -1.66 % change on previous year | -71.2% |
| 1969 | 7.87 % change on previous year | -572.8% |
| 1970 | -1.85 % change on previous year | -123.5% |
| 1971 | 2.3 % change on previous year | -224.5% |
| 1972 | 8.45 % change on previous year | +266.6% |
| 1973 | -8.02 % change on previous year | -195.0% |
| 1974 | -5.23 % change on previous year | -34.8% |
| 1975 | 0.0768 % change on previous year | -101.5% |
| 1976 | -5.05 % change on previous year | -6673.1% |
| 1977 | -5.82 % change on previous year | +15.2% |
| 1978 | -4.7 % change on previous year | -19.2% |
| 1979 | 3.41 % change on previous year | -172.5% |
| 1980 | -12.65 % change on previous year | -470.9% |
| 1981 | -6.15 % change on previous year | -51.4% |
| 1982 | -3.35 % change on previous year | -45.4% |
| 1983 | -16.74 % change on previous year | +399.0% |
| 1984 | -8.7 % change on previous year | -48.0% |
| 1985 | -5.63 % change on previous year | -35.2% |
| 1986 | -11.43 % change on previous year | +103.0% |
| 1987 | 3.99 % change on previous year | -134.9% |
| 1988 | 34.87 % change on previous year | +775.0% |
| 1989 | 0.3125 % change on previous year | -99.1% |
| 1990 | -18.79 % change on previous year | -6114.6% |
| 1991 | 10.56 % change on previous year | -156.2% |
| 1992 | 5.48 % change on previous year | -48.1% |
| 1993 | -15.74 % change on previous year | -387.1% |
| 1994 | -15.11 % change on previous year | -4.0% |
| 1995 | 14.86 % change on previous year | -198.3% |
| 1996 | 12.76 % change on previous year | -14.1% |
| 1997 | -2.87 % change on previous year | -122.5% |
| 1998 | -1.99 % change on previous year | -30.7% |
| 1999 | 21.42 % change on previous year | -1176.7% |
| 2000 | -19.6 % change on previous year | -191.5% |
| 2001 | -0.3419 % change on previous year | -98.3% |
| 2002 | -1.2 % change on previous year | +252.4% |
| 2003 | -1.32 % change on previous year | +9.3% |
| 2004 | 17.27 % change on previous year | -1410.5% |
| 2005 | -3.74 % change on previous year | -121.7% |
| 2006 | 10.95 % change on previous year | -392.9% |
| 2007 | -14.9 % change on previous year | -236.1% |
| 2008 | 29.3 % change on previous year | -296.6% |
| 2009 | -4.75 % change on previous year | -116.2% |
| 2010 | -27.18 % change on previous year | +472.4% |
| 2011 | 15.69 % change on previous year | -157.7% |
| 2012 | 8.12 % change on previous year | -48.3% |
| 2013 | -16.8 % change on previous year | -306.9% |
| 2014 | -13.57 % change on previous year | -19.2% |
| 2015 | 0.4392 % change on previous year | -103.2% |
| 2016 | -4.84 % change on previous year | -1201.9% |
| 2017 | -7.18 % change on previous year | +48.3% |
| 2018 | 6.31 % change on previous year | -187.9% |
| 2019 | -2.8 % change on previous year | -144.4% |
| 2020 | 7.65 % change on previous year | -372.7% |
| 2021 | 15.78 % change on previous year | +106.3% |
| 2022 | -8.66 % change on previous year | -154.8% |
Uruguay compared with similar countries
- Uruguay's -8.66 % change on previous year is below the median for high income countries, which is -4.8 % change on previous year, 1.8× the median. (54 countries reporting)
- Uruguay's -8.66 % change on previous year is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 0.0853 % change on previous year. (25 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1897 | -16530.2% | 0.127 % change on previous year | -20.87 % change on previous year |
| 1976 | -6673.1% | 0.0768 % change on previous year | -5.05 % change on previous year |
| 1990 | -6114.6% | 0.3125 % change on previous year | -18.79 % change on previous year |
| 1950 | +3630.3% | -11.53 % change on previous year | 406.97 % change on previous year |
| 1911 | -3066.4% | -0.2029 % change on previous year | -6.42 % change on previous year |
| 1906 | +2096.9% | 2.66 % change on previous year | 58.37 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 2.7 % change on previous year | -25.45 % change on previous year | 91.03 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1880s | 13.16 % change on previous year | -35.79 % change on previous year | 76.7 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.566 % change on previous year | -37.48 % change on previous year | 70.1 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1900s | 8.56 % change on previous year | -31.86 % change on previous year | 58.37 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1910s | -9.48 % change on previous year | -33.04 % change on previous year | 28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1920s | -2.26 % change on previous year | -28.77 % change on previous year | 41.09 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1930s | -0.1358 % change on previous year | -29.22 % change on previous year | 41.44 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1940s | -5.49 % change on previous year | -45.22 % change on previous year | 47.76 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1950s | 44.79 % change on previous year | -7.14 % change on previous year | 406.97 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1960s | 1.19 % change on previous year | -6.99 % change on previous year | 19.84 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.64 % change on previous year | -8.02 % change on previous year | 8.45 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | -2.55 % change on previous year | -16.74 % change on previous year | 34.87 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.06 % change on previous year | -18.79 % change on previous year | 21.42 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.17 % change on previous year | -19.6 % change on previous year | 29.3 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -4.18 % change on previous year | -27.18 % change on previous year | 15.69 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.93 % change on previous year | -8.66 % change on previous year | 15.78 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 134 Sweden -8.2 % change on previous year compare
- 135 Mali -8.44 % change on previous year compare
- 136 Uzbekistan -8.48 % change on previous year compare
- 138 Ireland -8.72 % change on previous year compare
- 139 Namibia -8.88 % change on previous year compare
- 140 Guatemala -9.01 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Uruguay
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 282.29 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 30,988 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 6,806 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 24,182 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 25.68 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 863.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,857 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,098 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,759 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 7.92 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay?
- Co2 intensity, annual growth rate in Uruguay was -8.66 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 406.97 % change on previous year in 1950.
- What is the lowest co2 intensity, annual growth rate recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was -45.22 % change on previous year in 1946.
- How does Uruguay rank for co2 intensity, annual growth rate?
- Uruguay ranks 137th out of 164 countries with data for 2022.
- Is co2 intensity, annual growth rate rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 206.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Co2 intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 152 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Co2 intensity Our World in Data
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Co2 intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.