Co2 land use per capita in Belarus
Belarus: Co2 land use per capita was -0.3888 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-0.3888
Change on year
down 21.9%
World rank
173rd
of 194 countries
All-time high
12.65
in 1850
All-time low
-0.3888
in 2024
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Belarus, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
The most recent figure for co2 land use per capita in Belarus is -0.3888, measured in 2024. That is the lowest value across all 175 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 21.9% on the previous year and down 243.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Belarus peaked at 12.65 in 1850 and was at its lowest, -0.3888, in 2024.
Belarus ranks 173rd of 194 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 12.65 | — |
| 1851 | 12.43 | -1.7% |
| 1852 | 12.23 | -1.6% |
| 1853 | 12.03 | -1.6% |
| 1854 | 12.07 | +0.3% |
| 1855 | 11.86 | -1.8% |
| 1856 | 11.87 | +0.1% |
| 1857 | 11.68 | -1.6% |
| 1858 | 11.56 | -1.1% |
| 1859 | 11.56 | +0.0% |
| 1860 | 11.45 | -0.9% |
| 1861 | 11.37 | -0.8% |
| 1862 | 11.35 | -0.1% |
| 1863 | 11.18 | -1.5% |
| 1864 | 11.1 | -0.7% |
| 1865 | 11.03 | -0.6% |
| 1866 | 10.93 | -0.9% |
| 1867 | 10.87 | -0.6% |
| 1868 | 10.76 | -1.0% |
| 1869 | 10.73 | -0.3% |
| 1870 | 10.78 | +0.5% |
| 1871 | 10.69 | -0.8% |
| 1872 | 10.49 | -1.8% |
| 1873 | 10.37 | -1.1% |
| 1874 | 10.32 | -0.5% |
| 1875 | 10.22 | -1.0% |
| 1876 | 10.14 | -0.8% |
| 1877 | 10.06 | -0.7% |
| 1878 | 10.06 | -0.0% |
| 1879 | 9.99 | -0.6% |
| 1880 | 9.87 | -1.2% |
| 1881 | 9.76 | -1.2% |
| 1882 | 9.76 | +0.0% |
| 1883 | 9.7 | -0.6% |
| 1884 | 9.61 | -0.9% |
| 1885 | 9.45 | -1.7% |
| 1886 | 9.43 | -0.2% |
| 1887 | 9.38 | -0.6% |
| 1888 | 9.29 | -1.0% |
| 1889 | 9.26 | -0.3% |
| 1890 | 9.21 | -0.5% |
| 1891 | 8.95 | -2.8% |
| 1892 | 8.94 | -0.1% |
| 1893 | 8.81 | -1.4% |
| 1894 | 8.77 | -0.5% |
| 1895 | 8.68 | -1.1% |
| 1896 | 8.6 | -0.9% |
| 1897 | 8.49 | -1.2% |
| 1898 | 8.44 | -0.6% |
| 1899 | 8.35 | -1.1% |
| 1900 | 8.46 | +1.4% |
| 1901 | 8.47 | +0.1% |
| 1902 | 8.36 | -1.3% |
| 1903 | 8.18 | -2.1% |
| 1904 | 8.16 | -0.3% |
| 1905 | 8.12 | -0.5% |
| 1906 | 8 | -1.5% |
| 1907 | 7.98 | -0.3% |
| 1908 | 7.93 | -0.6% |
| 1909 | 7.91 | -0.2% |
| 1910 | 7.49 | -5.3% |
| 1911 | 7.35 | -1.8% |
| 1912 | 7.22 | -1.7% |
| 1913 | 7.14 | -1.1% |
| 1914 | 7.08 | -0.9% |
| 1915 | 6.98 | -1.4% |
| 1916 | 6.85 | -1.9% |
| 1917 | 6.82 | -0.4% |
| 1918 | 6.75 | -1.0% |
| 1919 | 6.6 | -2.2% |
| 1920 | 6.72 | +1.8% |
| 1921 | 6.59 | -2.0% |
| 1922 | 6.55 | -0.5% |
| 1923 | 6.44 | -1.8% |
| 1924 | 6.39 | -0.7% |
| 1925 | 6.38 | -0.2% |
| 1926 | 6.32 | -0.9% |
| 1927 | 6.28 | -0.7% |
| 1928 | 6.23 | -0.8% |
| 1929 | 6.2 | -0.6% |
| 1930 | 6.24 | +0.6% |
| 1931 | 6.17 | -1.1% |
| 1932 | 6.16 | -0.0% |
| 1933 | 6.08 | -1.4% |
| 1934 | 6.09 | +0.3% |
| 1935 | 5.99 | -1.8% |
| 1936 | 6.09 | +1.7% |
| 1937 | 5.96 | -2.1% |
| 1938 | 5.97 | +0.2% |
| 1939 | 5.95 | -0.3% |
| 1940 | 5.53 | -7.2% |
| 1941 | 5.36 | -3.0% |
| 1942 | 5.27 | -1.7% |
| 1943 | 5.24 | -0.6% |
| 1944 | 5.11 | -2.3% |
| 1945 | 4.97 | -2.9% |
| 1946 | 4.92 | -1.0% |
| 1947 | 4.8 | -2.4% |
| 1948 | 4.69 | -2.2% |
| 1949 | 4.62 | -1.5% |
| 1950 | 4.14 | -10.5% |
| 1951 | 3.7 | -10.6% |
| 1952 | 3.53 | -4.6% |
| 1953 | 3.36 | -4.8% |
| 1954 | 3.46 | +3.1% |
| 1955 | 3.66 | +5.6% |
| 1956 | 3.86 | +5.4% |
| 1957 | 4.01 | +3.9% |
| 1958 | 4.02 | +0.3% |
| 1959 | 4.08 | +1.4% |
| 1960 | 3.39 | -17.0% |
| 1961 | 3.56 | +5.2% |
| 1962 | 2.92 | -18.0% |
| 1963 | 2.71 | -7.2% |
| 1964 | 2.78 | +2.7% |
| 1965 | 2.33 | -16.4% |
| 1966 | 2.43 | +4.2% |
| 1967 | 2.28 | -6.2% |
| 1968 | 2.61 | +14.8% |
| 1969 | 2.23 | -14.4% |
| 1970 | 2.17 | -2.8% |
| 1971 | 2.3 | +5.9% |
| 1972 | 2.37 | +3.0% |
| 1973 | 2.51 | +5.8% |
| 1974 | 2.12 | -15.5% |
| 1975 | 2.35 | +10.9% |
| 1976 | 2.33 | -0.8% |
| 1977 | 2 | -14.4% |
| 1978 | 1.91 | -4.2% |
| 1979 | 2.04 | +6.8% |
| 1980 | 2.03 | -0.4% |
| 1981 | 2.27 | +11.5% |
| 1982 | 2.12 | -6.7% |
| 1983 | 1.92 | -9.3% |
| 1984 | 2.05 | +6.6% |
| 1985 | 1.96 | -4.1% |
| 1986 | 1.78 | -9.2% |
| 1987 | 1.71 | -4.0% |
| 1988 | 1.61 | -5.9% |
| 1989 | 1.56 | -2.8% |
| 1990 | 1.53 | -2.5% |
| 1991 | 0.7208 | -52.8% |
| 1992 | 0.8417 | +16.8% |
| 1993 | 1.1 | +30.1% |
| 1994 | 1.95 | +78.0% |
| 1995 | 1.31 | -32.8% |
| 1996 | 1.12 | -14.6% |
| 1997 | 1.1 | -2.1% |
| 1998 | 1.47 | +34.2% |
| 1999 | 1.53 | +4.1% |
| 2000 | 0.3144 | -79.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0764 | -75.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0738 | -3.3% |
| 2003 | 0.0913 | +23.8% |
| 2004 | 0.2583 | +182.7% |
| 2005 | 0.4015 | +55.5% |
| 2006 | 0.2095 | -47.8% |
| 2007 | 0.4719 | +125.2% |
| 2008 | 0.5761 | +22.1% |
| 2009 | 0.4675 | -18.8% |
| 2010 | 0.4429 | -5.3% |
| 2011 | 0.278 | -37.2% |
| 2012 | 0.2741 | -1.4% |
| 2013 | 0.388 | +41.5% |
| 2014 | 0.2714 | -30.0% |
| 2015 | 0.344 | +26.7% |
| 2016 | 0.4039 | +17.4% |
| 2017 | 0.3461 | -14.3% |
| 2018 | 0.2156 | -37.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0205 | -90.5% |
| 2020 | -0.1082 | -627.5% |
| 2021 | -0.1845 | +70.5% |
| 2022 | -0.3161 | +71.4% |
| 2023 | -0.319 | +0.9% |
| 2024 | -0.3888 | +21.9% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's -0.3888 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0027. (58 countries reporting)
- Belarus's -0.3888 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.0731, 5.3× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 land use per capita in Belarus changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | -627.5% | 0.0205 | -0.1082 |
| 2004 | +182.7% | 0.0913 | 0.2583 |
| 2007 | +125.2% | 0.2095 | 0.4719 |
| 2019 | -90.5% | 0.2156 | 0.0205 |
| 1994 | +78.0% | 1.1 | 1.95 |
| 2000 | -79.5% | 1.53 | 0.3144 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 11.99 | 11.56 | 12.65 | 10 |
| 1860s | 11.08 | 10.73 | 11.45 | 10 |
| 1870s | 10.31 | 9.99 | 10.78 | 10 |
| 1880s | 9.55 | 9.26 | 9.87 | 10 |
| 1890s | 8.72 | 8.35 | 9.21 | 10 |
| 1900s | 8.16 | 7.91 | 8.47 | 10 |
| 1910s | 7.03 | 6.6 | 7.49 | 10 |
| 1920s | 6.41 | 6.2 | 6.72 | 10 |
| 1930s | 6.07 | 5.95 | 6.24 | 10 |
| 1940s | 5.05 | 4.62 | 5.53 | 10 |
| 1950s | 3.78 | 3.36 | 4.14 | 10 |
| 1960s | 2.72 | 2.23 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 1970s | 2.21 | 1.91 | 2.51 | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.9 | 1.56 | 2.27 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.27 | 0.7208 | 1.95 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2941 | 0.0738 | 0.5761 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2984 | 0.0205 | 0.4429 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.2633 | -0.3888 | -0.1082 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 170 Haiti -0.3604 compare
- 171 Liechtenstein -0.3609 compare
- 172 Kazakhstan -0.3788 compare
- 174 Czechia -0.5292 compare
- 175 Saint Lucia -0.5365 compare
- 176 Cyprus -0.6656 compare
More climate change data for Belarus
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 644.33 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 12,124 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 2,377 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 9,748 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 8.97 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 348.13 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 4,092 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,078 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.36 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 15.39 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Belarus?
- Co2 land use per capita in Belarus was -0.3888 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 12.65 in 1850.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.3888 in 2024.
- How does Belarus rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Belarus ranks 173rd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is down 243.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).