Co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Co2 land use per capita was -0.3788 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
-0.3788
Change on year
up 6.2%
World rank
172nd
of 194 countries
All-time high
25.69
in 1959
All-time low
-7.8
in 1939
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan stood at -0.3788.
The figure is up 6.2% on the previous year and down 81.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan peaked at 25.69 in 1959 and was at its lowest, -7.8, in 1939.
Kazakhstan ranks 172nd of 194 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 7.73 | — |
| 1851 | 7.7 | -0.4% |
| 1852 | 7.67 | -0.3% |
| 1853 | 7.63 | -0.6% |
| 1854 | 7.61 | -0.2% |
| 1855 | 7.56 | -0.7% |
| 1856 | 7.51 | -0.7% |
| 1857 | 7.46 | -0.7% |
| 1858 | 7.41 | -0.7% |
| 1859 | 7.35 | -0.8% |
| 1860 | 7.29 | -0.8% |
| 1861 | 7.31 | +0.3% |
| 1862 | 7.29 | -0.4% |
| 1863 | 7.25 | -0.4% |
| 1864 | 7.24 | -0.2% |
| 1865 | 7.2 | -0.5% |
| 1866 | 7.13 | -1.0% |
| 1867 | 7.09 | -0.6% |
| 1868 | 7.05 | -0.5% |
| 1869 | 6.98 | -1.0% |
| 1870 | 7.03 | +0.8% |
| 1871 | 6.99 | -0.6% |
| 1872 | 6.97 | -0.4% |
| 1873 | 6.95 | -0.3% |
| 1874 | 6.92 | -0.4% |
| 1875 | 6.89 | -0.5% |
| 1876 | 6.85 | -0.6% |
| 1877 | 6.82 | -0.5% |
| 1878 | 6.78 | -0.6% |
| 1879 | 6.72 | -0.8% |
| 1880 | 6.73 | +0.1% |
| 1881 | 6.72 | -0.2% |
| 1882 | 6.7 | -0.3% |
| 1883 | 6.65 | -0.8% |
| 1884 | 6.61 | -0.5% |
| 1885 | 6.57 | -0.6% |
| 1886 | 6.52 | -0.8% |
| 1887 | 6.45 | -1.0% |
| 1888 | 6.42 | -0.4% |
| 1889 | 6.39 | -0.5% |
| 1890 | 6.36 | -0.5% |
| 1891 | 6.36 | +0.1% |
| 1892 | 6.35 | -0.2% |
| 1893 | 6.32 | -0.4% |
| 1894 | 6.32 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | 6.29 | -0.5% |
| 1896 | 6.27 | -0.3% |
| 1897 | 6.24 | -0.5% |
| 1898 | 6.2 | -0.7% |
| 1899 | 6.17 | -0.5% |
| 1900 | 6.29 | +2.0% |
| 1901 | 6.31 | +0.3% |
| 1902 | 6.3 | -0.2% |
| 1903 | 6.3 | -0.1% |
| 1904 | 6.3 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | 6.28 | -0.2% |
| 1906 | 6.27 | -0.1% |
| 1907 | 6.24 | -0.4% |
| 1908 | 6.24 | -0.1% |
| 1909 | 6.22 | -0.3% |
| 1910 | 5.92 | -4.7% |
| 1911 | 5.8 | -2.0% |
| 1912 | 5.67 | -2.2% |
| 1913 | 5.58 | -1.7% |
| 1914 | 5.49 | -1.6% |
| 1915 | 5.41 | -1.5% |
| 1916 | 5.32 | -1.6% |
| 1917 | 5.23 | -1.6% |
| 1918 | 5.16 | -1.4% |
| 1919 | 5.08 | -1.5% |
| 1920 | 5.22 | +2.7% |
| 1921 | 5.25 | +0.7% |
| 1922 | 5.24 | -0.2% |
| 1923 | 5.23 | -0.2% |
| 1924 | 5.24 | +0.1% |
| 1925 | 5.19 | -0.9% |
| 1926 | 5.16 | -0.6% |
| 1927 | 5.11 | -0.9% |
| 1928 | 5.09 | -0.5% |
| 1929 | 5.04 | -1.0% |
| 1930 | 2.63 | -47.9% |
| 1931 | 0.7342 | -72.0% |
| 1932 | -0.8518 | -216.0% |
| 1933 | -2.25 | +163.6% |
| 1934 | -3.44 | +53.1% |
| 1935 | -4.53 | +31.7% |
| 1936 | -5.48 | +21.1% |
| 1937 | -6.34 | +15.6% |
| 1938 | -7.1 | +12.1% |
| 1939 | -7.8 | +9.8% |
| 1940 | -2.94 | -62.3% |
| 1941 | 0.2481 | -108.4% |
| 1942 | 2.67 | +977.5% |
| 1943 | 4.65 | +73.9% |
| 1944 | 6.31 | +35.8% |
| 1945 | 7.71 | +22.2% |
| 1946 | 8.91 | +15.5% |
| 1947 | 9.95 | +11.6% |
| 1948 | 10.85 | +9.0% |
| 1949 | 11.55 | +6.5% |
| 1950 | 14.84 | +28.4% |
| 1951 | 17.09 | +15.2% |
| 1952 | 18.81 | +10.0% |
| 1953 | 20.32 | +8.0% |
| 1954 | 21.55 | +6.1% |
| 1955 | 22.66 | +5.2% |
| 1956 | 23.54 | +3.9% |
| 1957 | 24.38 | +3.6% |
| 1958 | 25.03 | +2.7% |
| 1959 | 25.69 | +2.6% |
| 1960 | 19.82 | -22.9% |
| 1961 | 16.94 | -14.5% |
| 1962 | 13.49 | -20.4% |
| 1963 | 10.97 | -18.7% |
| 1964 | 9.18 | -16.3% |
| 1965 | 7.21 | -21.5% |
| 1966 | 6.15 | -14.6% |
| 1967 | 5.19 | -15.5% |
| 1968 | 4.68 | -9.9% |
| 1969 | 3.92 | -16.3% |
| 1970 | 3.51 | -10.5% |
| 1971 | 2.98 | -14.8% |
| 1972 | 2.5 | -16.1% |
| 1973 | 2.5 | -0.1% |
| 1974 | 1.97 | -21.3% |
| 1975 | 1.76 | -10.5% |
| 1976 | 1.56 | -11.4% |
| 1977 | 1.2 | -23.3% |
| 1978 | 0.8953 | -25.3% |
| 1979 | 0.8458 | -5.5% |
| 1980 | 0.9322 | +10.2% |
| 1981 | 0.8084 | -13.3% |
| 1982 | 0.744 | -8.0% |
| 1983 | 0.569 | -23.5% |
| 1984 | 0.5534 | -2.7% |
| 1985 | 0.5107 | -7.7% |
| 1986 | 0.4807 | -5.9% |
| 1987 | 0.2776 | -42.3% |
| 1988 | -0.0471 | -117.0% |
| 1989 | -0.2192 | +365.7% |
| 1990 | -0.1774 | -19.1% |
| 1991 | 0.091 | -151.3% |
| 1992 | -0.0441 | -148.5% |
| 1993 | -0.5803 | +1214.6% |
| 1994 | -0.3406 | -41.3% |
| 1995 | -2.85 | +736.1% |
| 1996 | -2.73 | -4.0% |
| 1997 | -2.91 | +6.5% |
| 1998 | -2.35 | -19.2% |
| 1999 | -4.87 | +107.0% |
| 2000 | -5.26 | +8.0% |
| 2001 | -6.02 | +14.4% |
| 2002 | -5.12 | -14.9% |
| 2003 | -4.18 | -18.4% |
| 2004 | -3.66 | -12.4% |
| 2005 | -3.27 | -10.8% |
| 2006 | -2.99 | -8.4% |
| 2007 | -2.97 | -0.7% |
| 2008 | -2.44 | -17.9% |
| 2009 | -2.16 | -11.5% |
| 2010 | -0.6854 | -68.3% |
| 2011 | -0.7162 | +4.5% |
| 2012 | -0.7904 | +10.4% |
| 2013 | -0.9339 | +18.2% |
| 2014 | -0.2089 | -77.6% |
| 2015 | -0.6752 | +223.2% |
| 2016 | -0.6967 | +3.2% |
| 2017 | -0.547 | -21.5% |
| 2018 | -0.8434 | +54.2% |
| 2019 | -0.4322 | -48.8% |
| 2020 | -0.3084 | -28.6% |
| 2021 | -0.4598 | +49.1% |
| 2022 | -0.4293 | -6.6% |
| 2023 | -0.4039 | -5.9% |
| 2024 | -0.3788 | -6.2% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's -0.3788 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0027. (58 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's -0.3788 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is -0.0731, 5.2× the median. (50 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | -1214.6% | -0.0441 | -0.5803 |
| 1942 | +977.5% | 0.2481 | 2.67 |
| 1995 | -736.1% | -0.3406 | -2.85 |
| 1989 | -365.7% | -0.0471 | -0.2192 |
| 2015 | -223.2% | -0.2089 | -0.6752 |
| 1932 | -216.0% | 0.7342 | -0.8518 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 7.56 | 7.35 | 7.73 | 10 |
| 1860s | 7.18 | 6.98 | 7.31 | 10 |
| 1870s | 6.89 | 6.72 | 7.03 | 10 |
| 1880s | 6.58 | 6.39 | 6.73 | 10 |
| 1890s | 6.29 | 6.17 | 6.36 | 10 |
| 1900s | 6.27 | 6.22 | 6.31 | 10 |
| 1910s | 5.47 | 5.08 | 5.92 | 10 |
| 1920s | 5.18 | 5.04 | 5.25 | 10 |
| 1930s | -3.44 | -7.8 | 2.63 | 10 |
| 1940s | 5.99 | -2.94 | 11.55 | 10 |
| 1950s | 21.39 | 14.84 | 25.69 | 10 |
| 1960s | 9.75 | 3.92 | 19.82 | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.97 | 0.8458 | 3.51 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.461 | -0.2192 | 0.9322 | 10 |
| 1990s | -1.68 | -4.87 | 0.091 | 10 |
| 2000s | -3.81 | -6.02 | -2.16 | 10 |
| 2010s | -0.6529 | -0.9339 | -0.2089 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.396 | -0.4598 | -0.3084 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan?
- Co2 land use per capita in Kazakhstan was -0.3788 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 25.69 in 1959.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was -7.8 in 1939.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 172nd out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 81.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).