Co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea
Equatorial Guinea: Co2 land use per capita was 0.7255 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
0.7255
Change on year
down 0.9%
World rank
56th
of 194 countries
All-time high
24.95
in 1888
All-time low
-45.32
in 1939
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea stood at 0.7255.
The figure is down 0.9% on the previous year and up 1,156.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea peaked at 24.95 in 1888 and was at its lowest, -45.32, in 1939.
That places Equatorial Guinea 56th out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 6.16 | — |
| 1851 | 4.8 | -22.0% |
| 1852 | 2.59 | -46.2% |
| 1853 | -0.6879 | -126.6% |
| 1854 | -0.5933 | -13.8% |
| 1855 | -0.6718 | +13.2% |
| 1856 | -2.69 | +300.3% |
| 1857 | 3.19 | -218.6% |
| 1858 | -1.67 | -152.2% |
| 1859 | 1.29 | -177.3% |
| 1860 | -0.0083 | -100.6% |
| 1861 | 2.56 | -31130.9% |
| 1862 | 2.95 | +15.2% |
| 1863 | 2.99 | +1.4% |
| 1864 | 3.65 | +22.0% |
| 1865 | 5.32 | +45.6% |
| 1866 | 3.8 | -28.5% |
| 1867 | 4.76 | +25.2% |
| 1868 | 3.85 | -19.1% |
| 1869 | 5.05 | +31.0% |
| 1870 | 10.49 | +107.9% |
| 1871 | 7.3 | -30.4% |
| 1872 | 8.65 | +18.5% |
| 1873 | 8.47 | -2.1% |
| 1874 | 7.73 | -8.7% |
| 1875 | 8.93 | +15.5% |
| 1876 | 11.56 | +29.5% |
| 1877 | 12.23 | +5.8% |
| 1878 | 18.15 | +48.4% |
| 1879 | 12.54 | -30.9% |
| 1880 | 16.73 | +33.4% |
| 1881 | 10.46 | -37.5% |
| 1882 | 11.59 | +10.9% |
| 1883 | 6.96 | -39.9% |
| 1884 | 9.86 | +41.6% |
| 1885 | 9.29 | -5.8% |
| 1886 | 11.56 | +24.4% |
| 1887 | 5.94 | -48.6% |
| 1888 | 24.95 | +320.2% |
| 1889 | 11.67 | -53.2% |
| 1890 | 5.33 | -54.4% |
| 1891 | 3.13 | -41.2% |
| 1892 | 0.8722 | -72.1% |
| 1893 | -0.1276 | -114.6% |
| 1894 | -1.55 | +1116.6% |
| 1895 | -1.25 | -19.2% |
| 1896 | -6.26 | +399.0% |
| 1897 | -3.28 | -47.5% |
| 1898 | -2.26 | -31.2% |
| 1899 | -3.86 | +71.0% |
| 1900 | -3.77 | -2.4% |
| 1901 | -8.01 | +112.5% |
| 1902 | -7.09 | -11.4% |
| 1903 | -13.32 | +87.7% |
| 1904 | -8.79 | -34.0% |
| 1905 | -10.59 | +20.6% |
| 1906 | -8.15 | -23.1% |
| 1907 | -11.63 | +42.8% |
| 1908 | -15.06 | +29.5% |
| 1909 | -13.84 | -8.1% |
| 1910 | -10.51 | -24.1% |
| 1911 | -14.17 | +34.9% |
| 1912 | -5.83 | -58.8% |
| 1913 | -10.76 | +84.5% |
| 1914 | -13.32 | +23.7% |
| 1915 | -17.06 | +28.1% |
| 1916 | -11.99 | -29.7% |
| 1917 | -14.25 | +18.8% |
| 1918 | -10.54 | -26.0% |
| 1919 | -12.26 | +16.4% |
| 1920 | -4.92 | -59.9% |
| 1921 | 0.5112 | -110.4% |
| 1922 | -1.01 | -298.3% |
| 1923 | 3.74 | -468.6% |
| 1924 | 4.16 | +11.4% |
| 1925 | 10.16 | +144.1% |
| 1926 | 10.41 | +2.4% |
| 1927 | 10.95 | +5.2% |
| 1928 | 14.42 | +31.8% |
| 1929 | 13.47 | -6.6% |
| 1930 | -0.4041 | -103.0% |
| 1931 | -12.51 | +2995.4% |
| 1932 | -11.32 | -9.5% |
| 1933 | -18.96 | +67.5% |
| 1934 | -34.17 | +80.2% |
| 1935 | -31.45 | -7.9% |
| 1936 | -33.93 | +7.9% |
| 1937 | -37.69 | +11.1% |
| 1938 | -44.64 | +18.4% |
| 1939 | -45.32 | +1.5% |
| 1940 | -41.72 | -7.9% |
| 1941 | -38.67 | -7.3% |
| 1942 | -34.95 | -9.6% |
| 1943 | -26.23 | -25.0% |
| 1944 | -21.78 | -16.9% |
| 1945 | -22.52 | +3.4% |
| 1946 | -17.21 | -23.6% |
| 1947 | -13.61 | -20.9% |
| 1948 | -15.72 | +15.5% |
| 1949 | -14.59 | -7.2% |
| 1950 | -9.65 | -33.9% |
| 1951 | -7.92 | -17.9% |
| 1952 | -7.74 | -2.3% |
| 1953 | -1.01 | -86.9% |
| 1954 | -6.39 | +532.4% |
| 1955 | -4.6 | -28.0% |
| 1956 | -2.39 | -48.1% |
| 1957 | -5.09 | +113.2% |
| 1958 | 0.3172 | -106.2% |
| 1959 | -7.42 | -2440.8% |
| 1960 | -1.86 | -74.9% |
| 1961 | -1.67 | -10.2% |
| 1962 | -7.04 | +321.1% |
| 1963 | -7.17 | +1.9% |
| 1964 | -1.04 | -85.5% |
| 1965 | -2.9 | +179.2% |
| 1966 | -1.93 | -33.3% |
| 1967 | -6.11 | +215.9% |
| 1968 | -2.8 | -54.2% |
| 1969 | -3.47 | +24.1% |
| 1970 | -2.43 | -30.0% |
| 1971 | -3.95 | +62.6% |
| 1972 | -4.21 | +6.5% |
| 1973 | -4.56 | +8.4% |
| 1974 | -4.81 | +5.6% |
| 1975 | -5.08 | +5.5% |
| 1976 | -4.89 | -3.6% |
| 1977 | -6.8 | +39.0% |
| 1978 | -6.64 | -2.4% |
| 1979 | -6.28 | -5.3% |
| 1980 | -4.22 | -32.9% |
| 1981 | -7.24 | +71.6% |
| 1982 | -3.78 | -47.8% |
| 1983 | -3.96 | +4.9% |
| 1984 | -4.99 | +25.9% |
| 1985 | -2.53 | -49.3% |
| 1986 | -2.95 | +16.5% |
| 1987 | -5 | +69.6% |
| 1988 | -1.93 | -61.4% |
| 1989 | 0.1838 | -109.5% |
| 1990 | -2.23 | -1314.5% |
| 1991 | -1.48 | -33.7% |
| 1992 | -3.15 | +112.6% |
| 1993 | -1.34 | -57.6% |
| 1994 | -1.55 | +15.7% |
| 1995 | -1.78 | +15.2% |
| 1996 | 2.15 | -220.8% |
| 1997 | -0.2607 | -112.1% |
| 1998 | 1.66 | -736.2% |
| 1999 | 1.42 | -14.5% |
| 2000 | 0.6924 | -51.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0894 | -87.1% |
| 2002 | 1.56 | +1646.0% |
| 2003 | 0.5602 | -64.1% |
| 2004 | 0.977 | +74.4% |
| 2005 | 0.6236 | -36.2% |
| 2006 | 0.4288 | -31.2% |
| 2007 | 0.9186 | +114.2% |
| 2008 | 0.7824 | -14.8% |
| 2009 | 2.01 | +156.4% |
| 2010 | -0.3324 | -116.6% |
| 2011 | 0.272 | -181.8% |
| 2012 | -0.5275 | -294.0% |
| 2013 | 0.7368 | -239.7% |
| 2014 | -0.0687 | -109.3% |
| 2015 | 0.8017 | -1267.2% |
| 2016 | 0.4661 | -41.9% |
| 2017 | 1.22 | +162.7% |
| 2018 | 0.6661 | -45.6% |
| 2019 | 0.8301 | +24.6% |
| 2020 | 1.29 | +55.0% |
| 2021 | 1.01 | -21.5% |
| 2022 | 1.21 | +19.9% |
| 2023 | 0.7324 | -39.5% |
| 2024 | 0.7255 | -0.9% |
Equatorial Guinea compared with similar countries
- Equatorial Guinea's 0.7255 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0027, 266.5× the median. (58 countries reporting)
- Equatorial Guinea's 0.7255 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.7654, 95% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1861 | +31130.9% | -0.0083 | 2.56 |
| 1931 | -2995.4% | -0.4041 | -12.51 |
| 1959 | -2440.8% | 0.3172 | -7.42 |
| 2002 | +1646.0% | 0.0894 | 1.56 |
| 1990 | -1314.5% | 0.1838 | -2.23 |
| 2015 | +1267.2% | -0.0687 | 0.8017 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 1.17 | -2.69 | 6.16 | 10 |
| 1860s | 3.49 | -0.0083 | 5.32 | 10 |
| 1870s | 10.61 | 7.3 | 18.15 | 10 |
| 1880s | 11.9 | 5.94 | 24.95 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.9267 | -6.26 | 5.33 | 10 |
| 1900s | -10.02 | -15.06 | -3.77 | 10 |
| 1910s | -12.07 | -17.06 | -5.83 | 10 |
| 1920s | 6.19 | -4.92 | 14.42 | 10 |
| 1930s | -27.04 | -45.32 | -0.4041 | 10 |
| 1940s | -24.7 | -41.72 | -13.61 | 10 |
| 1950s | -5.19 | -9.65 | 0.3172 | 10 |
| 1960s | -3.6 | -7.17 | -1.04 | 10 |
| 1970s | -4.97 | -6.8 | -2.43 | 10 |
| 1980s | -3.64 | -7.24 | 0.1838 | 10 |
| 1990s | -0.6557 | -3.15 | 2.15 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.8639 | 0.0894 | 2.01 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.4069 | -0.5275 | 1.22 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.9933 | 0.7255 | 1.29 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Equatorial Guinea
More climate change data for Equatorial Guinea
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 300,667 kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 25.27 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 10.65 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.0402 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.5221 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1.67 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0063 kt (2050)
- Synthetic Fertilizers — Emissions (CO2eq) 1.67 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea?
- Co2 land use per capita in Equatorial Guinea was 0.7255 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The highest recorded value was 24.95 in 1888.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Equatorial Guinea?
- The lowest recorded value was -45.32 in 1939.
- How does Equatorial Guinea rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 56th out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Equatorial Guinea?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,156.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Equatorial Guinea data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).