Co2 land use per capita in Sao Tome and Principe
Sao Tome and Principe: Co2 land use per capita was 0.5237 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
0.5237
Change on year
up 0.6%
World rank
57th
of 192 countries
All-time high
4.93
in 1859
All-time low
-4.23
in 1963
Years of data
175
1850–2024
Co2 land use per capita in Sao Tome and Principe, 1850–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Sao Tome and Principe recorded 0.5237 for co2 land use per capita in 2024.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.6% on the previous year and up 103.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 land use per capita in Sao Tome and Principe peaked at 4.93 in 1859 and was at its lowest, -4.23, in 1963.
That places Sao Tome and Principe 57th out of 192 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 land use per capita in Sao Tome and Principe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1850 | 3.43 | — |
| 1851 | 4.6 | +34.1% |
| 1852 | 3.59 | -21.9% |
| 1853 | 2.92 | -18.8% |
| 1854 | 2.68 | -8.1% |
| 1855 | 2.94 | +9.4% |
| 1856 | 2.08 | -29.2% |
| 1857 | 4.7 | +126.0% |
| 1858 | 2.82 | -39.9% |
| 1859 | 4.93 | +74.7% |
| 1860 | 2.73 | -44.7% |
| 1861 | 3.67 | +34.7% |
| 1862 | 3.45 | -6.1% |
| 1863 | 3.35 | -3.0% |
| 1864 | 2.9 | -13.3% |
| 1865 | 4.12 | +41.9% |
| 1866 | 3.51 | -14.8% |
| 1867 | 3.32 | -5.3% |
| 1868 | 3.57 | +7.5% |
| 1869 | 3.21 | -10.0% |
| 1870 | 4.36 | +35.5% |
| 1871 | 3.98 | -8.7% |
| 1872 | 3.47 | -12.7% |
| 1873 | 3.19 | -8.1% |
| 1874 | 2.58 | -19.1% |
| 1875 | 3.16 | +22.3% |
| 1876 | 4.01 | +27.0% |
| 1877 | 3.12 | -22.2% |
| 1878 | 2.66 | -14.5% |
| 1879 | 3.3 | +23.8% |
| 1880 | 3.37 | +2.3% |
| 1881 | 3.09 | -8.3% |
| 1882 | 2.62 | -15.4% |
| 1883 | 1.65 | -36.8% |
| 1884 | 3.12 | +88.9% |
| 1885 | 3.61 | +15.4% |
| 1886 | 3.88 | +7.5% |
| 1887 | 2.74 | -29.3% |
| 1888 | 4.16 | +51.6% |
| 1889 | 3.18 | -23.5% |
| 1890 | 2.44 | -23.2% |
| 1891 | 3.27 | +34.0% |
| 1892 | 3.02 | -7.7% |
| 1893 | 3.22 | +6.5% |
| 1894 | 2.67 | -17.0% |
| 1895 | 2.19 | -18.2% |
| 1896 | 2.75 | +26.0% |
| 1897 | 3.34 | +21.4% |
| 1898 | 3.45 | +3.1% |
| 1899 | 2.55 | -26.0% |
| 1900 | 2.8 | +9.6% |
| 1901 | 2.28 | -18.5% |
| 1902 | 2.35 | +3.0% |
| 1903 | 1.97 | -16.0% |
| 1904 | 1.73 | -12.1% |
| 1905 | 2.36 | +36.3% |
| 1906 | 3.56 | +50.8% |
| 1907 | 2.16 | -39.2% |
| 1908 | 0.8594 | -60.3% |
| 1909 | 1.56 | +81.4% |
| 1910 | 1.86 | +19.4% |
| 1911 | 2.26 | +21.1% |
| 1912 | 1.97 | -12.8% |
| 1913 | 2.36 | +19.8% |
| 1914 | 1.52 | -35.6% |
| 1915 | 1.97 | +29.7% |
| 1916 | 1.16 | -41.3% |
| 1917 | 1.79 | +54.9% |
| 1918 | 2.08 | +16.0% |
| 1919 | 1.83 | -11.7% |
| 1920 | 2.03 | +10.5% |
| 1921 | 1.74 | -14.2% |
| 1922 | 0.4542 | -73.9% |
| 1923 | 1.34 | +195.4% |
| 1924 | 1.36 | +1.5% |
| 1925 | 2.41 | +76.8% |
| 1926 | 1.62 | -32.8% |
| 1927 | 1.8 | +11.1% |
| 1928 | 2.14 | +19.1% |
| 1929 | 2.08 | -2.9% |
| 1930 | 1.22 | -41.2% |
| 1931 | 1.08 | -11.5% |
| 1932 | 0.9712 | -10.3% |
| 1933 | 1.19 | +22.7% |
| 1934 | 0.4658 | -60.9% |
| 1935 | 0.784 | +68.3% |
| 1936 | 1.55 | +97.2% |
| 1937 | 0.9412 | -39.1% |
| 1938 | 0.1584 | -83.2% |
| 1939 | 1.17 | +638.3% |
| 1940 | -0.0113 | -101.0% |
| 1941 | -0.1364 | +1111.3% |
| 1942 | -0.1324 | -2.9% |
| 1943 | -0.5605 | +323.3% |
| 1944 | -0.1646 | -70.6% |
| 1945 | -1.75 | +961.6% |
| 1946 | -0.4724 | -73.0% |
| 1947 | -0.7344 | +55.5% |
| 1948 | -1.21 | +64.2% |
| 1949 | -0.9373 | -22.3% |
| 1950 | -1.72 | +83.5% |
| 1951 | -2.48 | +44.0% |
| 1952 | -2.71 | +9.4% |
| 1953 | -1.69 | -37.5% |
| 1954 | -1.63 | -3.6% |
| 1955 | -1.42 | -13.0% |
| 1956 | -1.43 | +0.7% |
| 1957 | -1.44 | +0.7% |
| 1958 | -1.89 | +31.0% |
| 1959 | -4.23 | +124.2% |
| 1960 | -4.04 | -4.4% |
| 1961 | -4.06 | +0.5% |
| 1962 | -4.18 | +3.0% |
| 1963 | -4.23 | +1.2% |
| 1964 | -2.62 | -38.1% |
| 1965 | -3.26 | +24.3% |
| 1966 | -3.25 | -0.2% |
| 1967 | -2.96 | -9.1% |
| 1968 | -2.86 | -3.3% |
| 1969 | -3.08 | +7.8% |
| 1970 | -1.58 | -48.8% |
| 1971 | -2.1 | +33.2% |
| 1972 | -2.03 | -3.5% |
| 1973 | -1.97 | -2.8% |
| 1974 | -1.97 | -0.1% |
| 1975 | -1.86 | -5.8% |
| 1976 | -1.56 | -16.0% |
| 1977 | -1.86 | +19.1% |
| 1978 | -1.71 | -8.2% |
| 1979 | -1.72 | +0.5% |
| 1980 | -1.38 | -19.8% |
| 1981 | -2.06 | +49.6% |
| 1982 | -0.9299 | -54.8% |
| 1983 | -2.29 | +146.3% |
| 1984 | -1.36 | -40.8% |
| 1985 | -1.74 | +28.4% |
| 1986 | -1.79 | +2.7% |
| 1987 | -0.6634 | -62.9% |
| 1988 | -1.33 | +99.9% |
| 1989 | -1.7 | +28.2% |
| 1990 | -0.5422 | -68.1% |
| 1991 | -0.9522 | +75.6% |
| 1992 | -0.9577 | +0.6% |
| 1993 | -0.1485 | -84.5% |
| 1994 | -1.08 | +625.4% |
| 1995 | -1.09 | +1.1% |
| 1996 | -1.09 | -0.3% |
| 1997 | 1.96 | -280.7% |
| 1998 | 3.24 | +65.3% |
| 1999 | 1.56 | -51.9% |
| 2000 | 0.9888 | -36.5% |
| 2001 | 0.2728 | -72.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0398 | -85.4% |
| 2003 | 0.8413 | +2012.0% |
| 2004 | -0.1628 | -119.4% |
| 2005 | -0.2849 | +75.0% |
| 2006 | -0.3802 | +33.5% |
| 2007 | -0.4456 | +17.2% |
| 2008 | -0.3632 | -18.5% |
| 2009 | -0.4373 | +20.4% |
| 2010 | 1.18 | -370.8% |
| 2011 | 0.7091 | -40.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0677 | -90.5% |
| 2013 | 1.13 | +1567.7% |
| 2014 | 0.2579 | -77.2% |
| 2015 | 2.04 | +689.9% |
| 2016 | 1.29 | -36.7% |
| 2017 | 1.2 | -7.2% |
| 2018 | 0.4971 | -58.4% |
| 2019 | 0.3434 | -30.9% |
| 2020 | 0.8007 | +133.2% |
| 2021 | 0.3567 | -55.5% |
| 2022 | 0.505 | +41.6% |
| 2023 | 0.5205 | +3.1% |
| 2024 | 0.5237 | +0.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 3.47 | 2.08 | 4.93 | 10 |
| 1860s | 3.38 | 2.73 | 4.12 | 10 |
| 1870s | 3.38 | 2.58 | 4.36 | 10 |
| 1880s | 3.14 | 1.65 | 4.16 | 10 |
| 1890s | 2.89 | 2.19 | 3.45 | 10 |
| 1900s | 2.16 | 0.8594 | 3.56 | 10 |
| 1910s | 1.88 | 1.16 | 2.36 | 10 |
| 1920s | 1.7 | 0.4542 | 2.41 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.9534 | 0.1584 | 1.55 | 10 |
| 1940s | -0.6102 | -1.75 | -0.0113 | 10 |
| 1950s | -2.06 | -4.23 | -1.42 | 10 |
| 1960s | -3.46 | -4.23 | -2.62 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.84 | -2.1 | -1.56 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.52 | -2.29 | -0.6634 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.091 | -1.09 | 3.24 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0069 | -0.4456 | 0.9888 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.871 | 0.0677 | 2.04 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.5413 | 0.3567 | 0.8007 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Sao Tome and Principe
More climate change data for Sao Tome and Principe
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 23.37 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 15.5 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 7.87 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.0585 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.2811 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 0.5528 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 0.424 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 0.1288 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0016 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.0046 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 land use per capita in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Co2 land use per capita in Sao Tome and Principe was 0.5237 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 land use per capita recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The highest recorded value was 4.93 in 1859.
- What is the lowest co2 land use per capita recorded in Sao Tome and Principe?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.23 in 1963.
- How does Sao Tome and Principe rank for co2 land use per capita?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 57th out of 192 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 land use per capita rising or falling in Sao Tome and Principe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 103.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sao Tome and Principe data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 land use per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 175 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).