Co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Co2 per capita marimekko was 1.71 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
1.71
Change on year
up 2.9%
World rank
139th
of 213 countries
All-time high
1.81
in 2007
All-time low
0
in 1870
Years of data
155
1870–2024
Co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica, 1870–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica stood at 1.71.
That represents a change of up 2.9% on the previous year and up 5.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica peaked at 1.81 in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1870.
That places Costa Rica 139th out of 213 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1870 | 0 | — |
| 1871 | 0.0001 | +160.4% |
| 1872 | 0.0001 | -2.6% |
| 1873 | 0.0001 | +179.1% |
| 1874 | 0.0004 | +170.1% |
| 1875 | 0.0002 | -60.6% |
| 1876 | 0.0002 | +15.7% |
| 1877 | 0.0005 | +188.1% |
| 1878 | 0.0031 | +476.1% |
| 1879 | 0.0051 | +68.2% |
| 1880 | 0.0029 | -43.5% |
| 1881 | 0.0005 | -83.3% |
| 1882 | 0.0004 | -16.2% |
| 1883 | 0.0033 | +710.5% |
| 1884 | 0.0082 | +149.6% |
| 1885 | 0.0052 | -36.7% |
| 1886 | 0.0111 | +113.6% |
| 1887 | 0.007 | -37.3% |
| 1888 | 0.0026 | -63.0% |
| 1889 | 0.0223 | +764.4% |
| 1890 | 0.0637 | +185.6% |
| 1891 | 0.0466 | -26.8% |
| 1892 | 0.1335 | +186.3% |
| 1893 | 0.1035 | -22.5% |
| 1894 | 0.1065 | +2.9% |
| 1895 | 0.0823 | -22.7% |
| 1896 | 0.0914 | +11.0% |
| 1897 | 0.0789 | -13.7% |
| 1898 | 0.108 | +37.0% |
| 1899 | 0.0954 | -11.7% |
| 1900 | 0.0956 | +0.3% |
| 1901 | 0.0985 | +3.0% |
| 1902 | 0.0671 | -31.8% |
| 1903 | 0.1132 | +68.6% |
| 1904 | 0.1009 | -10.8% |
| 1905 | 0.0694 | -31.2% |
| 1906 | 0.213 | +206.8% |
| 1907 | 0.1692 | -20.6% |
| 1908 | 0.2393 | +41.5% |
| 1909 | 0.1351 | -43.6% |
| 1910 | 0.2508 | +85.7% |
| 1911 | 0.2783 | +11.0% |
| 1912 | 0.2774 | -0.3% |
| 1913 | 0.2731 | -1.6% |
| 1914 | 0.2364 | -13.4% |
| 1915 | 0.1684 | -28.8% |
| 1916 | 0.1336 | -20.7% |
| 1917 | 0.0604 | -54.8% |
| 1918 | 0.0094 | -84.4% |
| 1919 | 0.0679 | +621.0% |
| 1920 | 0.0783 | +15.3% |
| 1921 | 0.0183 | -76.6% |
| 1922 | 0.0124 | -32.2% |
| 1923 | 0.0166 | +33.7% |
| 1924 | 0.0185 | +11.1% |
| 1925 | 0.0061 | -66.8% |
| 1926 | 0.003 | -50.9% |
| 1927 | 0.003 | -1.7% |
| 1928 | 0.0385 | +1202.2% |
| 1929 | 0.0377 | -2.1% |
| 1930 | 0.0206 | -45.3% |
| 1931 | 0.0104 | -49.5% |
| 1932 | 0.0121 | +16.1% |
| 1933 | 0.0007 | -94.6% |
| 1934 | 0.0006 | -2.1% |
| 1935 | 0.0126 | +1861.5% |
| 1936 | 0.0012 | -90.2% |
| 1937 | 0.0127 | +925.7% |
| 1938 | 0.0012 | -90.7% |
| 1939 | 0.0006 | -51.4% |
| 1940 | 0.0056 | +876.1% |
| 1941 | 0.0005 | -90.3% |
| 1942 | 0.0011 | +94.6% |
| 1943 | 0.001 | -10.1% |
| 1944 | 0.0079 | +730.7% |
| 1945 | 0.0005 | -94.0% |
| 1946 | 0.0005 | -3.3% |
| 1947 | 0.0004 | -3.3% |
| 1948 | 0.0086 | +1838.1% |
| 1949 | 0.0004 | -95.2% |
| 1950 | 0.3088 | +73952.3% |
| 1951 | 0.3258 | +5.5% |
| 1952 | 0.3916 | +20.2% |
| 1953 | 0.421 | +7.5% |
| 1954 | 0.3822 | -9.2% |
| 1955 | 0.3156 | -17.4% |
| 1956 | 0.4228 | +34.0% |
| 1957 | 0.3891 | -8.0% |
| 1958 | 0.363 | -6.7% |
| 1959 | 0.3009 | -17.1% |
| 1960 | 0.3699 | +22.9% |
| 1961 | 0.3563 | -3.7% |
| 1962 | 0.3845 | +7.9% |
| 1963 | 0.4056 | +5.5% |
| 1964 | 0.4394 | +8.3% |
| 1965 | 0.5333 | +21.4% |
| 1966 | 0.6059 | +13.6% |
| 1967 | 0.518 | -14.5% |
| 1968 | 0.5957 | +15.0% |
| 1969 | 0.6406 | +7.5% |
| 1970 | 0.679 | +6.0% |
| 1971 | 0.8086 | +19.1% |
| 1972 | 0.9087 | +12.4% |
| 1973 | 1.03 | +13.1% |
| 1974 | 0.9335 | -9.2% |
| 1975 | 0.9728 | +4.2% |
| 1976 | 0.9692 | -0.4% |
| 1977 | 1.18 | +22.0% |
| 1978 | 1.29 | +8.7% |
| 1979 | 1.19 | -7.1% |
| 1980 | 1.02 | -14.3% |
| 1981 | 0.9098 | -11.1% |
| 1982 | 0.8196 | -9.9% |
| 1983 | 0.8044 | -1.9% |
| 1984 | 0.7419 | -7.8% |
| 1985 | 0.8171 | +10.1% |
| 1986 | 0.914 | +11.9% |
| 1987 | 0.9406 | +2.9% |
| 1988 | 0.978 | +4.0% |
| 1989 | 0.9625 | -1.6% |
| 1990 | 0.9319 | -3.2% |
| 1991 | 1.03 | +10.0% |
| 1992 | 1.14 | +11.0% |
| 1993 | 1.15 | +1.3% |
| 1994 | 1.5 | +30.4% |
| 1995 | 1.35 | -9.9% |
| 1996 | 1.29 | -4.7% |
| 1997 | 1.32 | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 1.38 | +4.1% |
| 1999 | 1.4 | +1.7% |
| 2000 | 1.36 | -2.8% |
| 2001 | 1.41 | +3.2% |
| 2002 | 1.52 | +8.4% |
| 2003 | 1.58 | +3.8% |
| 2004 | 1.62 | +2.2% |
| 2005 | 1.56 | -3.4% |
| 2006 | 1.61 | +3.3% |
| 2007 | 1.81 | +11.8% |
| 2008 | 1.79 | -1.0% |
| 2009 | 1.71 | -4.3% |
| 2010 | 1.64 | -4.2% |
| 2011 | 1.58 | -3.6% |
| 2012 | 1.55 | -2.0% |
| 2013 | 1.61 | +3.9% |
| 2014 | 1.62 | +0.5% |
| 2015 | 1.53 | -5.5% |
| 2016 | 1.61 | +5.4% |
| 2017 | 1.63 | +1.1% |
| 2018 | 1.61 | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 1.53 | -4.7% |
| 2020 | 1.34 | -12.4% |
| 2021 | 1.51 | +12.9% |
| 2022 | 1.58 | +4.0% |
| 2023 | 1.66 | +5.3% |
| 2024 | 1.71 | +2.9% |
Costa Rica compared with similar countries
- Costa Rica's 1.71 is below the median for high income countries, which is 6.14, 28% of the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Costa Rica's 1.71 is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 2.93, 58% of the median. (38 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1950 | +73952.3% | 0.0004 | 0.3088 |
| 1935 | +1861.5% | 0.0006 | 0.0126 |
| 1948 | +1838.1% | 0.0004 | 0.0086 |
| 1928 | +1202.2% | 0.003 | 0.0385 |
| 1937 | +925.7% | 0.0012 | 0.0127 |
| 1940 | +876.1% | 0.0006 | 0.0056 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0.001 | 0 | 0.0051 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0.0064 | 0.0004 | 0.0223 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0.091 | 0.0466 | 0.1335 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0.1301 | 0.0671 | 0.2393 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0.1756 | 0.0094 | 0.2783 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.0232 | 0.003 | 0.0783 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.0073 | 0.0006 | 0.0206 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0.0027 | 0.0004 | 0.0086 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.3621 | 0.3009 | 0.4228 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.4849 | 0.3563 | 0.6406 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.9963 | 0.679 | 1.29 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8912 | 0.7419 | 1.02 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.25 | 0.9319 | 1.5 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.6 | 1.36 | 1.81 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.59 | 1.53 | 1.64 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.56 | 1.34 | 1.71 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
More climate change data for Costa Rica
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 108.28 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,751 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 942.79 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,808 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 3.56 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 100.29 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 688.78 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 623.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 65.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 2.35 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica?
- Co2 per capita marimekko in Costa Rica was 1.71 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest co2 per capita marimekko recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 1.81 in 2007.
- What is the lowest co2 per capita marimekko recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1870.
- How does Costa Rica rank for co2 per capita marimekko?
- Costa Rica ranks 139th out of 213 countries with data for 2024.
- Is co2 per capita marimekko rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Co2 per capita marimekko. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 155 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).