Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Latvia
Latvia: Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Latvia, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.
Analysis
Latvia recorded 0 kt per square kilometre for crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in 2023.
That represents a change of down 14.1% on the previous year and up 36.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Latvia peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 1995.
Latvia ranks 32nd of 163 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 32 years of available data.
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Latvia, year by year
| Year | kt per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 kt per square kilometre | — |
| 1993 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 1994 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -24.4% |
| 1995 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -19.6% |
| 1996 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +28.5% |
| 1997 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1998 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.7% |
| 1999 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2000 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 2001 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2002 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2003 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2004 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2005 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2006 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2007 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +24.2% |
| 2008 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +9.9% |
| 2009 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2010 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2011 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 2012 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +43.3% |
| 2013 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -7.0% |
| 2014 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2015 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 2016 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2017 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2018 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2019 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +49.1% |
| 2020 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +9.7% |
| 2021 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2022 | 0 kt per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 2023 | 0 kt per square kilometre | -14.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 0 kt per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 29 Luxembourg 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 30 Malawi 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 31 Togo 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 33 Paraguay 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 34 Azerbaijan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
- 35 El Salvador 0 kt per square kilometre compare
More climate change data for Latvia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 43.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Latvia?
- Crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Latvia was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 1995.
- How does Latvia rank for crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
- Latvia ranks 32nd out of 163 countries with data for 2023.
- Is crop residues — direct emissions (n2o), per square kilometre rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 36.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Crop Residues — Direct emissions Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Crop Residues — Direct emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.