Cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe
Zimbabwe: Cumulative co2 including land was 2.93 billion in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2024)
2.93 billion
Change on year
up 0.4%
World rank
81st
of 194 countries
All-time high
2.93 billion
in 2024
All-time low
3.00 million
in 1903
Years of data
122
1903–2024
Cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe, 1903–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
Zimbabwe recorded 2.93 billion for cumulative co2 including land in 2024. That is the highest value across all 122 years on record.
The figure is up 0.4% on the previous year and up 4.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe peaked at 2.93 billion in 2024 and was at its lowest, 3.00 million, in 1903.
That places Zimbabwe 81st out of 194 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1903 | 3.00 million | — |
| 1904 | 6.15 million | +105.3% |
| 1905 | 9.46 million | +53.9% |
| 1906 | 12.86 million | +35.8% |
| 1907 | 16.32 million | +26.9% |
| 1908 | 19.95 million | +22.3% |
| 1909 | 23.64 million | +18.5% |
| 1910 | 27.68 million | +17.1% |
| 1911 | 31.95 million | +15.4% |
| 1912 | 36.37 million | +13.9% |
| 1913 | 40.91 million | +12.5% |
| 1914 | 45.79 million | +11.9% |
| 1915 | 50.85 million | +11.1% |
| 1916 | 56.14 million | +10.4% |
| 1917 | 61.70 million | +9.9% |
| 1918 | 67.06 million | +8.7% |
| 1919 | 72.50 million | +8.1% |
| 1920 | 79.15 million | +9.2% |
| 1921 | 86.47 million | +9.2% |
| 1922 | 94.08 million | +8.8% |
| 1923 | 102.19 million | +8.6% |
| 1924 | 110.63 million | +8.3% |
| 1925 | 119.47 million | +8.0% |
| 1926 | 128.94 million | +7.9% |
| 1927 | 138.56 million | +7.5% |
| 1928 | 148.78 million | +7.4% |
| 1929 | 158.88 million | +6.8% |
| 1930 | 169.39 million | +6.6% |
| 1931 | 179.37 million | +5.9% |
| 1932 | 189.24 million | +5.5% |
| 1933 | 199.30 million | +5.3% |
| 1934 | 209.77 million | +5.3% |
| 1935 | 220.59 million | +5.2% |
| 1936 | 231.47 million | +4.9% |
| 1937 | 243.36 million | +5.1% |
| 1938 | 255.34 million | +4.9% |
| 1939 | 267.42 million | +4.7% |
| 1940 | 282.22 million | +5.5% |
| 1941 | 298.91 million | +5.9% |
| 1942 | 316.83 million | +6.0% |
| 1943 | 335.80 million | +6.0% |
| 1944 | 355.39 million | +5.8% |
| 1945 | 374.93 million | +5.5% |
| 1946 | 394.48 million | +5.2% |
| 1947 | 413.96 million | +4.9% |
| 1948 | 434.07 million | +4.9% |
| 1949 | 455.01 million | +4.8% |
| 1950 | 473.80 million | +4.1% |
| 1951 | 493.82 million | +4.2% |
| 1952 | 514.27 million | +4.1% |
| 1953 | 535.33 million | +4.1% |
| 1954 | 557.59 million | +4.2% |
| 1955 | 580.59 million | +4.1% |
| 1956 | 604.50 million | +4.1% |
| 1957 | 629.23 million | +4.1% |
| 1958 | 653.93 million | +3.9% |
| 1959 | 679.39 million | +3.9% |
| 1960 | 705.60 million | +3.9% |
| 1961 | 728.93 million | +3.3% |
| 1962 | 753.13 million | +3.3% |
| 1963 | 775.13 million | +2.9% |
| 1964 | 796.13 million | +2.7% |
| 1965 | 812.54 million | +2.1% |
| 1966 | 833.50 million | +2.6% |
| 1967 | 852.05 million | +2.2% |
| 1968 | 876.35 million | +2.9% |
| 1969 | 901.91 million | +2.9% |
| 1970 | 931.10 million | +3.2% |
| 1971 | 964.02 million | +3.5% |
| 1972 | 994.07 million | +3.1% |
| 1973 | 1.03 billion | +3.3% |
| 1974 | 1.06 billion | +3.0% |
| 1975 | 1.09 billion | +2.6% |
| 1976 | 1.12 billion | +3.0% |
| 1977 | 1.15 billion | +2.5% |
| 1978 | 1.17 billion | +2.3% |
| 1979 | 1.20 billion | +2.4% |
| 1980 | 1.24 billion | +2.9% |
| 1981 | 1.27 billion | +2.8% |
| 1982 | 1.31 billion | +3.3% |
| 1983 | 1.35 billion | +2.9% |
| 1984 | 1.39 billion | +2.5% |
| 1985 | 1.42 billion | +2.7% |
| 1986 | 1.45 billion | +2.0% |
| 1987 | 1.49 billion | +2.4% |
| 1988 | 1.54 billion | +3.7% |
| 1989 | 1.60 billion | +3.7% |
| 1990 | 1.66 billion | +3.4% |
| 1991 | 1.70 billion | +2.4% |
| 1992 | 1.75 billion | +2.9% |
| 1993 | 1.81 billion | +3.9% |
| 1994 | 1.87 billion | +3.4% |
| 1995 | 1.94 billion | +3.6% |
| 1996 | 1.99 billion | +2.6% |
| 1997 | 2.04 billion | +2.5% |
| 1998 | 2.11 billion | +3.2% |
| 1999 | 2.19 billion | +3.8% |
| 2000 | 2.24 billion | +2.6% |
| 2001 | 2.30 billion | +2.4% |
| 2002 | 2.35 billion | +2.2% |
| 2003 | 2.41 billion | +2.5% |
| 2004 | 2.46 billion | +2.2% |
| 2005 | 2.52 billion | +2.4% |
| 2006 | 2.57 billion | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 2.62 billion | +2.2% |
| 2008 | 2.66 billion | +1.4% |
| 2009 | 2.69 billion | +1.2% |
| 2010 | 2.74 billion | +1.6% |
| 2011 | 2.77 billion | +1.1% |
| 2012 | 2.79 billion | +0.7% |
| 2013 | 2.80 billion | +0.4% |
| 2014 | 2.81 billion | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 2.83 billion | +0.6% |
| 2016 | 2.84 billion | +0.4% |
| 2017 | 2.85 billion | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 2.86 billion | +0.4% |
| 2019 | 2.88 billion | +0.6% |
| 2020 | 2.89 billion | +0.3% |
| 2021 | 2.90 billion | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 2.91 billion | +0.4% |
| 2023 | 2.92 billion | +0.4% |
| 2024 | 2.93 billion | +0.4% |
Zimbabwe compared with similar countries
- Zimbabwe's 2.93 billion is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 1.88 billion, 1.6× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Zimbabwe's 2.93 billion is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 1.26 billion, 2.3× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1904 | +105.3% | 3.00 million | 6.15 million |
| 1905 | +53.9% | 6.15 million | 9.46 million |
| 1906 | +35.8% | 9.46 million | 12.86 million |
| 1907 | +26.9% | 12.86 million | 16.32 million |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 13.05 million | 3.00 million | 23.64 million | 7 |
| 1910s | 49.10 million | 27.68 million | 72.50 million | 10 |
| 1920s | 116.71 million | 79.15 million | 158.88 million | 10 |
| 1930s | 216.53 million | 169.39 million | 267.42 million | 10 |
| 1940s | 366.16 million | 282.22 million | 455.01 million | 10 |
| 1950s | 572.24 million | 473.80 million | 679.39 million | 10 |
| 1960s | 803.53 million | 705.60 million | 901.91 million | 10 |
| 1970s | 1.07 billion | 931.10 million | 1.20 billion | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.41 billion | 1.24 billion | 1.60 billion | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.91 billion | 1.66 billion | 2.19 billion | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.48 billion | 2.24 billion | 2.69 billion | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.81 billion | 2.74 billion | 2.88 billion | 10 |
| 2020s | 2.91 billion | 2.89 billion | 2.93 billion | 5 |
Countries ranked near Zimbabwe
More climate change data for Zimbabwe
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 178.46 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 17,716 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,805 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 11,912 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 21.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 425.42 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,483 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,345 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 137.94 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.08 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe?
- Cumulative co2 including land in Zimbabwe was 2.93 billion in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest cumulative co2 including land recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The highest recorded value was 2.93 billion in 2024.
- What is the lowest cumulative co2 including land recorded in Zimbabwe?
- The lowest recorded value was 3.00 million in 1903.
- How does Zimbabwe rank for cumulative co2 including land?
- Zimbabwe ranks 81st out of 194 countries with data for 2024.
- Is cumulative co2 including land rising or falling in Zimbabwe?
- Over the last ten years it is up 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Zimbabwe data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Cumulative co2 including land. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 122 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).