Global warming fossil in Latvia
Latvia: Global warming fossil was 0.0005 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Global warming fossil in Latvia, 1851–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, global warming fossil in Latvia stood at 0.0005. That is the highest value across all 174 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.7% on the previous year and up 9.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, global warming fossil in Latvia peaked at 0.0005 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1851.
That places Latvia 107th out of 214 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Global warming fossil in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 0 | — |
| 1852 | 0 | +104.2% |
| 1853 | 0 | +53.1% |
| 1854 | 0 | +36.1% |
| 1855 | 0 | +27.7% |
| 1856 | 0 | +22.4% |
| 1857 | 0 | +19.0% |
| 1858 | 0 | +16.7% |
| 1859 | 0 | +9.6% |
| 1860 | 0 | +4.7% |
| 1861 | 0 | +7.5% |
| 1862 | 0 | +9.9% |
| 1863 | 0 | +11.9% |
| 1864 | 0 | +11.2% |
| 1865 | 0 | +10.6% |
| 1866 | 0 | +10.2% |
| 1867 | 0 | +9.7% |
| 1868 | 0 | +9.0% |
| 1869 | 0 | +8.4% |
| 1870 | 0 | +7.9% |
| 1871 | 0 | +7.4% |
| 1872 | 0 | +6.9% |
| 1873 | 0 | +6.5% |
| 1874 | 0 | +6.3% |
| 1875 | 0 | +6.0% |
| 1876 | 0 | +5.8% |
| 1877 | 0 | +5.6% |
| 1878 | 0 | +5.4% |
| 1879 | 0 | +6.3% |
| 1880 | 0 | +7.0% |
| 1881 | 0 | +6.1% |
| 1882 | 0 | +5.3% |
| 1883 | 0 | +4.6% |
| 1884 | 0 | +4.5% |
| 1885 | 0 | +4.3% |
| 1886 | 0 | +4.1% |
| 1887 | 0 | +3.8% |
| 1888 | 0 | +3.7% |
| 1889 | 0 | +3.6% |
| 1890 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1891 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1892 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1893 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1894 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1895 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1896 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1897 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1898 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1899 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1900 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1901 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1902 | 0 | +3.1% |
| 1903 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1904 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1905 | 0 | +2.8% |
| 1906 | 0 | +2.9% |
| 1907 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1908 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1909 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1910 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1911 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1912 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1913 | 0 | +3.7% |
| 1914 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1915 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1916 | 0 | +2.5% |
| 1917 | 0 | +1.6% |
| 1918 | 0 | +0.3% |
| 1919 | 0 | -0.3% |
| 1920 | 0 | -0.1% |
| 1921 | 0 | +0.0% |
| 1922 | 0 | +0.3% |
| 1923 | 0 | +0.5% |
| 1924 | 0 | +0.5% |
| 1925 | 0 | +0.3% |
| 1926 | 0 | +0.5% |
| 1927 | 0 | +0.6% |
| 1928 | 0 | +0.6% |
| 1929 | 0 | +0.6% |
| 1930 | 0 | +1.0% |
| 1931 | 0 | +1.0% |
| 1932 | 0 | +1.0% |
| 1933 | 0 | +1.0% |
| 1934 | 0 | +1.3% |
| 1935 | 0 | +1.5% |
| 1936 | 0 | +2.5% |
| 1937 | 0 | +3.1% |
| 1938 | 0 | +3.6% |
| 1939 | 0 | +4.0% |
| 1940 | 0 | +4.3% |
| 1941 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1942 | 0 | +1.9% |
| 1943 | 0 | +1.8% |
| 1944 | 0 | +2.5% |
| 1945 | 0 | +2.7% |
| 1946 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1947 | 0.0001 | +3.5% |
| 1948 | 0.0001 | +3.6% |
| 1949 | 0.0001 | +3.9% |
| 1950 | 0.0001 | +4.2% |
| 1951 | 0.0001 | +4.4% |
| 1952 | 0.0001 | +4.5% |
| 1953 | 0.0001 | +4.6% |
| 1954 | 0.0001 | +4.8% |
| 1955 | 0.0001 | +5.1% |
| 1956 | 0.0001 | +5.3% |
| 1957 | 0.0001 | +5.5% |
| 1958 | 0.0001 | +5.6% |
| 1959 | 0.0001 | +5.5% |
| 1960 | 0.0001 | +5.4% |
| 1961 | 0.0001 | +5.3% |
| 1962 | 0.0001 | +5.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 | +5.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 | +5.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 | +5.5% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 | +5.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 | +5.4% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 | +5.3% |
| 1969 | 0.0002 | +5.2% |
| 1970 | 0.0002 | +5.2% |
| 1971 | 0.0002 | +5.2% |
| 1972 | 0.0002 | +5.2% |
| 1973 | 0.0002 | +5.1% |
| 1974 | 0.0002 | +5.1% |
| 1975 | 0.0002 | +5.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0002 | +5.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0002 | +4.9% |
| 1978 | 0.0002 | +4.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 | +4.6% |
| 1980 | 0.0003 | +4.6% |
| 1981 | 0.0003 | +4.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0003 | +4.2% |
| 1983 | 0.0003 | +4.1% |
| 1984 | 0.0003 | +4.0% |
| 1985 | 0.0003 | +4.1% |
| 1986 | 0.0003 | +3.6% |
| 1987 | 0.0003 | +2.9% |
| 1988 | 0.0003 | +2.7% |
| 1989 | 0.0004 | +2.5% |
| 1990 | 0.0004 | +2.6% |
| 1991 | 0.0004 | +2.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0004 | +1.8% |
| 1993 | 0.0004 | +1.4% |
| 1994 | 0.0004 | +1.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0004 | +1.0% |
| 1996 | 0.0004 | +1.0% |
| 1997 | 0.0004 | +0.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0004 | +0.9% |
| 1999 | 0.0004 | +0.8% |
| 2000 | 0.0004 | +0.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0004 | +0.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0004 | +0.7% |
| 2003 | 0.0004 | +0.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0004 | +0.8% |
| 2005 | 0.0004 | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 0.0004 | +1.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0004 | +1.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0004 | +0.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0004 | +0.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 0.0004 | +0.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2016 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2017 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0005 | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2020 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0005 | +0.9% |
| 2022 | 0.0005 | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0005 | +0.8% |
| 2024 | 0.0005 | +0.7% |
Latvia compared with similar countries
- Latvia's 0.0005 is below the median for high income countries, which is 0.0012, 44% of the median. (74 countries reporting)
- Latvia's 0.0005 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0.0016, 31% of the median. (52 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Global warming fossil in Latvia changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1852 | +104.2% | 0 | 0 |
| 1853 | +53.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 1854 | +36.1% | 0 | 0 |
| 1855 | +27.7% | 0 | 0 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0002 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 0.0002 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0003 | 0.0003 | 0.0004 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 0.0004 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0005 | 0.0004 | 0.0005 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
More climate change data for Latvia
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 43.09 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,340 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 263.83 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 1,077 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 0.9956 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 38.45 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 342.8 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 336.47 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 6.33 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 1.27 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is global warming fossil in Latvia?
- Global warming fossil in Latvia was 0.0005 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest global warming fossil recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0005 in 2024.
- What is the lowest global warming fossil recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1851.
- How does Latvia rank for global warming fossil?
- Latvia ranks 107th out of 214 countries with data for 2024.
- Is global warming fossil rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Global warming fossil. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 174 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).