Global warming land in Eswatini
Eswatini: Global warming land was 0.0001 in 2024. ◆ Volatile
Global warming land in Eswatini, 1851–2024
Source: Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2024, global warming land in Eswatini stood at 0.0001. That is the highest value across all 174 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.2% on the previous year and up 2.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, global warming land in Eswatini peaked at 0.0001 in 2024 and was at its lowest, 0, in 1851.
Eswatini ranks 143rd of 201 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Global warming land in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1851 | 0 | — |
| 1852 | 0 | +102.6% |
| 1853 | 0 | +51.5% |
| 1854 | 0 | +34.8% |
| 1855 | 0 | +26.4% |
| 1856 | 0 | +21.3% |
| 1857 | 0 | +17.8% |
| 1858 | 0 | +15.5% |
| 1859 | 0 | +13.7% |
| 1860 | 0 | +13.0% |
| 1861 | 0 | +11.8% |
| 1862 | 0 | +10.5% |
| 1863 | 0 | +9.9% |
| 1864 | 0 | +9.0% |
| 1865 | 0 | +8.3% |
| 1866 | 0 | +7.7% |
| 1867 | 0 | +7.3% |
| 1868 | 0 | +6.8% |
| 1869 | 0 | +6.4% |
| 1870 | 0 | +6.8% |
| 1871 | 0 | +6.8% |
| 1872 | 0 | +6.7% |
| 1873 | 0 | +6.3% |
| 1874 | 0 | +6.0% |
| 1875 | 0 | +5.9% |
| 1876 | 0 | +5.7% |
| 1877 | 0 | +5.4% |
| 1878 | 0 | +5.1% |
| 1879 | 0 | +5.0% |
| 1880 | 0 | +4.5% |
| 1881 | 0 | +4.2% |
| 1882 | 0 | +4.1% |
| 1883 | 0 | +3.9% |
| 1884 | 0 | +3.8% |
| 1885 | 0 | +3.7% |
| 1886 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1887 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1888 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1889 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1890 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1891 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1892 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1893 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1894 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1895 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1896 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1897 | 0 | +3.1% |
| 1898 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1899 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1900 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1901 | 0 | +3.8% |
| 1902 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1903 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1904 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1905 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1906 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1907 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1908 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1909 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1910 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1911 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1912 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1913 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1914 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1915 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1916 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1917 | 0 | +3.1% |
| 1918 | 0 | +3.0% |
| 1919 | 0 | +2.9% |
| 1920 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1921 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1922 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1923 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1924 | 0 | +3.5% |
| 1925 | 0 | +3.4% |
| 1926 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1927 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1928 | 0 | +3.3% |
| 1929 | 0 | +3.2% |
| 1930 | 0 | +2.3% |
| 1931 | 0 | +1.9% |
| 1932 | 0 | +1.7% |
| 1933 | 0 | +1.6% |
| 1934 | 0 | +1.5% |
| 1935 | 0 | +1.4% |
| 1936 | 0 | +1.4% |
| 1937 | 0 | +1.4% |
| 1938 | 0 | +1.3% |
| 1939 | 0 | +1.4% |
| 1940 | 0 | +3.6% |
| 1941 | 0 | +4.5% |
| 1942 | 0 | +5.1% |
| 1943 | 0 | +5.4% |
| 1944 | 0 | +5.6% |
| 1945 | 0 | +5.6% |
| 1946 | 0 | +5.7% |
| 1947 | 0 | +5.7% |
| 1948 | 0 | +5.5% |
| 1949 | 0 | +5.5% |
| 1950 | 0 | +4.6% |
| 1951 | 0 | +4.3% |
| 1952 | 0 | +4.1% |
| 1953 | 0 | +3.9% |
| 1954 | 0 | +3.9% |
| 1955 | 0 | +3.8% |
| 1956 | 0.0001 | +3.7% |
| 1957 | 0.0001 | +3.6% |
| 1958 | 0.0001 | +3.5% |
| 1959 | 0.0001 | +3.8% |
| 1960 | 0.0001 | +2.9% |
| 1961 | 0.0001 | +2.9% |
| 1962 | 0.0001 | +2.3% |
| 1963 | 0.0001 | +2.1% |
| 1964 | 0.0001 | +2.2% |
| 1965 | 0.0001 | +2.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 | +1.9% |
| 1967 | 0.0001 | +1.7% |
| 1968 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1969 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1970 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1971 | 0.0001 | +2.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0001 | +1.8% |
| 1973 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1974 | 0.0001 | +1.5% |
| 1975 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0001 | +1.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0001 | +2.2% |
| 1978 | 0.0001 | +1.6% |
| 1979 | 0.0001 | +1.2% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 1981 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 | +1.8% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 | +0.9% |
| 1985 | 0.0001 | +1.2% |
| 1986 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 | +1.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 | +1.5% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 | +1.2% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 | +1.1% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 | +1.0% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 | +0.9% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1996 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 1998 | 0.0001 | +0.4% |
| 1999 | 0.0001 | +0.3% |
| 2000 | 0.0001 | +0.5% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2002 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2005 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2011 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2012 | 0.0001 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0001 | +0.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0001 | +0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2019 | 0.0001 | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
| 2021 | 0.0001 | +0.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0001 | +0.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0001 | +0.3% |
| 2024 | 0.0001 | +0.2% |
Eswatini compared with similar countries
- Eswatini's 0.0001 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 0.0011, 9% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Eswatini's 0.0001 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 0.0011, 9% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Global warming land in Eswatini changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1852 | +102.6% | 0 | 0 |
| 1853 | +51.5% | 0 | 0 |
| 1854 | +34.8% | 0 | 0 |
| 1855 | +26.4% | 0 | 0 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 1960s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 1970s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 0.0001 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More climate change data for Eswatini
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 10.39 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 1,459 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 469.92 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 988.9 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 1.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 35.32 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 77.58 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 66.81 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 10.77 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 0.2521 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is global warming land in Eswatini?
- Global warming land in Eswatini was 0.0001 in 2024, according to Our World in Data.
- What is the highest global warming land recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0001 in 2024.
- What is the lowest global warming land recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 in 1851.
- How does Eswatini rank for global warming land?
- Eswatini ranks 143rd out of 201 countries with data for 2024.
- Is global warming land rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Our World in Data, published as part of Global warming land. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 174 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).