IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
0 kt per square kilometre
Change on year
up 3.8%
World rank
99th
of 186 countries
All-time high
0 kt per square kilometre
in 1997
All-time low
0 kt per square kilometre
in 2001
Years of data
63
1961–2023

IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961–2023

00000196119922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in kt per square kilometre.

Analysis

Costa Rica recorded 0 kt per square kilometre for ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 3.8% on the previous year and up 19.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Costa Rica peaked at 0 kt per square kilometre in 1997 and was at its lowest, 0 kt per square kilometre, in 2001.

Costa Rica ranks 99th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica, 1961 to 2023.
Year kt per square kilometre Change
1961 0 kt per square kilometre
1962 0 kt per square kilometre +8.8%
1963 0 kt per square kilometre +8.6%
1964 0 kt per square kilometre +7.9%
1965 0 kt per square kilometre +7.3%
1966 0 kt per square kilometre +7.6%
1967 0 kt per square kilometre +7.0%
1968 0 kt per square kilometre +6.6%
1969 0 kt per square kilometre +6.8%
1970 0 kt per square kilometre +6.9%
1971 0 kt per square kilometre +7.6%
1972 0 kt per square kilometre +9.5%
1973 0 kt per square kilometre -4.1%
1974 0 kt per square kilometre +37.8%
1975 0 kt per square kilometre +9.0%
1976 0 kt per square kilometre -1.3%
1977 0 kt per square kilometre +0.3%
1978 0 kt per square kilometre +10.3%
1979 0 kt per square kilometre +5.5%
1980 0 kt per square kilometre -1.1%
1981 0 kt per square kilometre -4.7%
1982 0 kt per square kilometre -8.8%
1983 0 kt per square kilometre -11.6%
1984 0 kt per square kilometre +8.0%
1985 0 kt per square kilometre -4.4%
1986 0 kt per square kilometre -5.6%
1987 0 kt per square kilometre -60.4%
1988 0 kt per square kilometre +86.8%
1989 0 kt per square kilometre +39.4%
1990 0 kt per square kilometre +40.2%
1991 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
1992 0 kt per square kilometre +44.2%
1993 0 kt per square kilometre +12.9%
1994 0 kt per square kilometre +2.9%
1995 0 kt per square kilometre -20.8%
1996 0 kt per square kilometre +45.6%
1997 0 kt per square kilometre +49.9%
1998 0 kt per square kilometre -22.9%
1999 0 kt per square kilometre -11.5%
2000 0 kt per square kilometre -74.1%
2001 0 kt per square kilometre -95.5%
2002 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2003 0 kt per square kilometre +11.1%
2004 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2005 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2006 0 kt per square kilometre +35.0%
2007 0 kt per square kilometre +6.7%
2008 0 kt per square kilometre -30.6%
2009 0 kt per square kilometre +26.0%
2010 0 kt per square kilometre +7.1%
2011 0 kt per square kilometre +0.7%
2012 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2013 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2014 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2015 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2016 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2017 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2018 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2019 0 kt per square kilometre +0.0%
2020 0 kt per square kilometre +2.9%
2021 0 kt per square kilometre +7.9%
2022 0 kt per square kilometre +4.0%
2023 0 kt per square kilometre +3.8%

Biggest year-on-year movements

Years where IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.

YearChange FromTo
2001 -95.5% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
1988 +86.8% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
2000 -74.1% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
1987 -60.4% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
1997 +49.9% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre
1996 +45.6% 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 9
1970s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
1980s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
1990s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
2000s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
2010s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 10
2020s 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre 4

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 96 Indonesia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  2. 97 Maldives 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  3. 98 Estonia 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  4. 100 Uzbekistan 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  5. 101 Morocco 0 kt per square kilometre compare
  6. 102 Kazakhstan 0 kt per square kilometre compare

See the full ranking of 187 places →

More climate change data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Costa Rica?
Ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre in Costa Rica was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 1997.
What is the lowest ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was 0 kt per square kilometre in 2001.
How does Costa Rica rank for ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 99th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
Is ippu — emissions (n2o), per square kilometre rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 19.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/ippu-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/ippu-emissions-n2o-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/">IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

IPPU — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

IPPU — Emissions (N2O) ÷ Land area (sq. km)

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
IPPU — Emissions (N2O), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
187 places, 10,734 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

IPPU — Emissions (N2O) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.