Manure applied to Soils — Emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica

Costa Rica: Manure applied to Soils — Emissions, annual growth rate was 15.66 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
15.66 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 250.3%
World rank
2nd
of 195 countries
All-time high
20.05 % change on previous year
in 2011
All-time low
-12.94 % change on previous year
in 2010
Years of data
62
1962–2023

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica, 1962–2023

-1001020196219922023

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

In 2023, manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica stood at 15.66 % change on previous year.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 250.3% on the previous year and up 111.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica peaked at 20.05 % change on previous year in 2011 and was at its lowest, -12.94 % change on previous year, in 2010.

Costa Rica ranks 2nd of 195 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica, year by year

Annual values for Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate in Costa Rica, 1962 to 2023.
Year % change on previous year Change
1962 -1.26 % change on previous year
1963 10.5 % change on previous year -934.3%
1964 6.1 % change on previous year -41.9%
1965 -0.7246 % change on previous year -111.9%
1966 3.13 % change on previous year -531.7%
1967 8.44 % change on previous year +169.9%
1968 5.83 % change on previous year -31.0%
1969 9.12 % change on previous year +56.5%
1970 3.67 % change on previous year -59.7%
1971 4.6 % change on previous year +25.1%
1972 5.88 % change on previous year +28.0%
1973 0.3165 % change on previous year -94.6%
1974 1.61 % change on previous year +409.5%
1975 4 % change on previous year +148.2%
1976 4.51 % change on previous year +12.7%
1977 4.6 % change on previous year +2.0%
1978 2.52 % change on previous year -45.3%
1979 2.1 % change on previous year -16.6%
1980 1.16 % change on previous year -44.8%
1981 1.43 % change on previous year +23.6%
1982 -8.31 % change on previous year -679.7%
1983 7.95 % change on previous year -195.7%
1984 -2.37 % change on previous year -129.8%
1985 1.58 % change on previous year -166.6%
1986 -2.24 % change on previous year -242.2%
1987 0.8831 % change on previous year -139.3%
1988 11.76 % change on previous year +1231.6%
1989 1.46 % change on previous year -87.6%
1990 5.4 % change on previous year +269.6%
1991 5.22 % change on previous year -3.3%
1992 3.36 % change on previous year -35.6%
1993 7.3 % change on previous year +116.8%
1994 2.07 % change on previous year -71.6%
1995 2.95 % change on previous year +42.5%
1996 -0.7963 % change on previous year -127.0%
1997 6.46 % change on previous year -911.5%
1998 9.52 % change on previous year +47.3%
1999 -0.5852 % change on previous year -106.1%
2000 1.9 % change on previous year -425.4%
2001 2.58 % change on previous year +35.6%
2002 4.11 % change on previous year +59.1%
2003 2.72 % change on previous year -33.8%
2004 1.25 % change on previous year -53.9%
2005 0.4436 % change on previous year -64.6%
2006 6.7 % change on previous year +1410.5%
2007 9.63 % change on previous year +43.8%
2008 -0.6118 % change on previous year -106.4%
2009 1.58 % change on previous year -359.0%
2010 -12.94 % change on previous year -916.8%
2011 20.05 % change on previous year -254.9%
2012 0.4071 % change on previous year -98.0%
2013 7.42 % change on previous year +1722.9%
2014 1.21 % change on previous year -83.7%
2015 1.86 % change on previous year +53.8%
2016 1.11 % change on previous year -40.5%
2017 -0.1975 % change on previous year -117.8%
2018 -0.7146 % change on previous year +261.8%
2019 2.67 % change on previous year -473.4%
2020 -1.32 % change on previous year -149.3%
2021 -0.7322 % change on previous year -44.3%
2022 -10.42 % change on previous year +1322.4%
2023 15.66 % change on previous year -250.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1960s 5.14 % change on previous year -1.26 % change on previous year 10.5 % change on previous year 8
1970s 3.38 % change on previous year 0.3165 % change on previous year 5.88 % change on previous year 10
1980s 1.33 % change on previous year -8.31 % change on previous year 11.76 % change on previous year 10
1990s 4.09 % change on previous year -0.7963 % change on previous year 9.52 % change on previous year 10
2000s 3.03 % change on previous year -0.6118 % change on previous year 9.63 % change on previous year 10
2010s 2.09 % change on previous year -12.94 % change on previous year 20.05 % change on previous year 10
2020s 0.7984 % change on previous year -10.42 % change on previous year 15.66 % change on previous year 4

Countries ranked near Costa Rica

  1. 1 Martinique 84.21 % change on previous year compare
  2. 3 Singapore 15.24 % change on previous year compare
  3. 4 Germany 13.81 % change on previous year compare
  4. 5 Fiji 12.98 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 247 places →

More climate change data for Costa Rica

All data for Costa Rica →

Frequently asked questions

What is manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica?
Manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica was 15.66 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate recorded in Costa Rica?
The highest recorded value was 20.05 % change on previous year in 2011.
What is the lowest manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate recorded in Costa Rica?
The lowest recorded value was -12.94 % change on previous year in 2010.
How does Costa Rica rank for manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 2nd out of 195 countries with data for 2023.
Is manure applied to soils — emissions, annual growth rate rising or falling in Costa Rica?
Over the last ten years it is up 111.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Manure applied to Soils — Emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/stat/manure-applied-to-soils-emissions-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/">Manure applied to Soils — Emissions, annual growth rate in Costa Rica</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
247 places, 13,953 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Manure applied to Soils — Emissions (N2O). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.