Meat of cattle: Production, per unit … cattle unit GDP Production in Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan: Meat of cattle: Production, per unit … cattle unit GDP Production was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per unit in Kazakhstan, 1992–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in t per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit in Kazakhstan stood at 0 t per US$ of GDP. That is the lowest value across all 32 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 10.4% on the previous year and down 5.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit in Kazakhstan peaked at 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0 t per US$ of GDP, in 2023.
That places Kazakhstan 58th out of 166 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of cattle: Production, per unit … cattle unit GDP Production in Kazakhstan, year by year
| Year | t per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1993 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +18.1% |
| 1994 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +6.8% |
| 1995 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.9% |
| 1996 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -19.2% |
| 1997 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -17.4% |
| 1998 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -12.5% |
| 1999 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +29.7% |
| 2000 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -17.9% |
| 2001 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -22.5% |
| 2002 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2003 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.8% |
| 2004 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.5% |
| 2005 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.2% |
| 2006 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.8% |
| 2007 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 2008 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -18.5% |
| 2009 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +14.6% |
| 2010 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -20.0% |
| 2011 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -25.8% |
| 2012 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -11.9% |
| 2013 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -9.8% |
| 2014 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +13.0% |
| 2015 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +23.4% |
| 2016 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +38.8% |
| 2017 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -13.9% |
| 2018 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -1.4% |
| 2019 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -24.0% |
| 2020 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 2021 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.2% |
| 2022 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -15.3% |
| 2023 | 0 t per US$ of GDP | -10.4% |
Kazakhstan compared with similar countries
- Kazakhstan's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 2.6× the median. (49 countries reporting)
- Kazakhstan's 0 t per US$ of GDP is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 0 t per US$ of GDP, 4.0× the median. (44 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Kazakhstan
More climate change data for Kazakhstan
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 52.07 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 21,403 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 5,230 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 16,173 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 19.73 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 577.6 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 2,395 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,596 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 798.63 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 6.02 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit in Kazakhstan?
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit in Kazakhstan was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The highest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 1994.
- What is the lowest meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit recorded in Kazakhstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 t per US$ of GDP in 2023.
- How does Kazakhstan rank for meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit?
- Kazakhstan ranks 58th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — production, per unit rising or falling in Kazakhstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Kazakhstan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 32 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Meat of cattle with the bone, fresh or chilled — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.