Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador
Ecuador: Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth was -1.4 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded -1.4 % change on previous year for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth in 2023.
That represents a change of down 8.1% on the previous year and down 147.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador peaked at 72.01 % change on previous year in 2001 and was at its lowest, -58.1 % change on previous year, in 2000.
That places Ecuador 124th out of 193 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 1.47 % change on previous year | — |
| 1963 | -7.12 % change on previous year | -583.8% |
| 1964 | 1.13 % change on previous year | -115.9% |
| 1965 | 1.04 % change on previous year | -7.9% |
| 1966 | 0.5047 % change on previous year | -51.5% |
| 1967 | -0.3151 % change on previous year | -162.4% |
| 1968 | -0.4578 % change on previous year | +45.3% |
| 1969 | 1.42 % change on previous year | -410.5% |
| 1970 | 1.16 % change on previous year | -18.4% |
| 1971 | 0.3849 % change on previous year | -66.8% |
| 1972 | 0.1028 % change on previous year | -73.3% |
| 1973 | 1.75 % change on previous year | +1603.7% |
| 1974 | -0.0853 % change on previous year | -104.9% |
| 1975 | -2.98 % change on previous year | +3395.3% |
| 1976 | -29.66 % change on previous year | +894.5% |
| 1977 | 40.42 % change on previous year | -236.3% |
| 1978 | -0.124 % change on previous year | -100.3% |
| 1979 | -2.56 % change on previous year | +1962.0% |
| 1980 | 0.6238 % change on previous year | -124.4% |
| 1981 | 1.96 % change on previous year | +214.0% |
| 1982 | -19.9 % change on previous year | -1115.8% |
| 1983 | -3.59 % change on previous year | -82.0% |
| 1984 | 33.65 % change on previous year | -1037.2% |
| 1985 | 5.91 % change on previous year | -82.4% |
| 1986 | 9.43 % change on previous year | +59.4% |
| 1987 | 22.98 % change on previous year | +143.8% |
| 1988 | 2.54 % change on previous year | -89.0% |
| 1989 | 0.3828 % change on previous year | -84.9% |
| 1990 | 0.1358 % change on previous year | -64.5% |
| 1991 | 6.33 % change on previous year | +4562.7% |
| 1992 | 3.62 % change on previous year | -42.9% |
| 1993 | -21.7 % change on previous year | -699.9% |
| 1994 | -2.82 % change on previous year | -87.0% |
| 1995 | -19.56 % change on previous year | +593.2% |
| 1996 | 1.34 % change on previous year | -106.9% |
| 1997 | 0.5116 % change on previous year | -61.9% |
| 1998 | -30.78 % change on previous year | -6117.0% |
| 1999 | 28.28 % change on previous year | -191.9% |
| 2000 | -58.1 % change on previous year | -305.5% |
| 2001 | 72.01 % change on previous year | -223.9% |
| 2002 | -49.5 % change on previous year | -168.7% |
| 2003 | -37.04 % change on previous year | -25.2% |
| 2004 | 35.04 % change on previous year | -194.6% |
| 2005 | 25.11 % change on previous year | -28.3% |
| 2006 | -10.26 % change on previous year | -140.8% |
| 2007 | -8.68 % change on previous year | -15.3% |
| 2008 | -18.22 % change on previous year | +109.9% |
| 2009 | 14.57 % change on previous year | -179.9% |
| 2010 | 63.27 % change on previous year | +334.3% |
| 2011 | -20.48 % change on previous year | -132.4% |
| 2012 | -7.06 % change on previous year | -65.5% |
| 2013 | 2.93 % change on previous year | -141.5% |
| 2014 | -14.6 % change on previous year | -598.1% |
| 2015 | -12.27 % change on previous year | -15.9% |
| 2016 | -7.45 % change on previous year | -39.3% |
| 2017 | -5.42 % change on previous year | -27.2% |
| 2018 | 0.7603 % change on previous year | -114.0% |
| 2019 | 5.69 % change on previous year | +647.9% |
| 2020 | 2.45 % change on previous year | -57.0% |
| 2021 | 2.78 % change on previous year | +13.5% |
| 2022 | -1.29 % change on previous year | -146.6% |
| 2023 | -1.4 % change on previous year | +8.1% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1998 | -6117.0% | 0.5116 % change on previous year | -30.78 % change on previous year |
| 1991 | +4562.7% | 0.1358 % change on previous year | 6.33 % change on previous year |
| 1975 | -3395.3% | -0.0853 % change on previous year | -2.98 % change on previous year |
| 1979 | -1962.0% | -0.124 % change on previous year | -2.56 % change on previous year |
| 1973 | +1603.7% | 0.1028 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | -0.2901 % change on previous year | -7.12 % change on previous year | 1.47 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1970s | 0.8404 % change on previous year | -29.66 % change on previous year | 40.42 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.4 % change on previous year | -19.9 % change on previous year | 33.65 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -3.46 % change on previous year | -30.78 % change on previous year | 28.28 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | -3.51 % change on previous year | -58.1 % change on previous year | 72.01 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.5376 % change on previous year | -20.48 % change on previous year | 63.27 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.6329 % change on previous year | -1.4 % change on previous year | 2.78 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 121 Belize -1.23 % change on previous year compare
- 122 Sweden -1.25 % change on previous year compare
- 123 Brazil -1.39 % change on previous year compare
- 125 Lebanon -1.4 % change on previous year compare
- 126 Mexico -1.41 % change on previous year compare
- 127 Comoros -1.42 % change on previous year compare
More climate change data for Ecuador
- Nutrient nitrogen N (total) — Synthetic fertilizers (Agricultural) 218.44 million kg (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) 19,195 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 4,758 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 14,437 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 17.95 kt (2050)
- Emissions from livestock — Emissions 515.62 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) 3,911 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O 1,488 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions (CO2eq) from CH4 2,423 kt (2050)
- Emissions from crops — Emissions 5.62 kt (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador?
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth in Ecuador was -1.4 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 72.01 % change on previous year in 2001.
- What is the lowest meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was -58.1 % change on previous year in 2000.
- How does Ecuador rank for meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth?
- Ecuador ranks 124th out of 193 countries with data for 2023.
- Is meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — emissions intensity, annual growth rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 147.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity, annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 62 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Meat of sheep, fresh or chilled — Emissions intensity. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.